Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects ofd-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined the effects of expectation on the subjective effects and oral self-administration of 15 mgd-amphetamine (AMP) and placebo in 40 volunteers who reported no prior use of stimulants other than caffeine. A balanced placebo design was used to create four groups: told Placebo/got Placebo (P/P), told Placebo/got Stimulant (P/S), told Stimulant/got Placebo (S/P), told Stimulant/got Stimulant (S/S). There were three sessions. On one session (INFO), participants received a capsule containing AMP or placebo and were given information about the contents of the capsule according to the balanced placebo design. On another session (NO INFO), participants received no information about the capsule's contents and were given placebo. On the final session, participants were allowed to choose either the INFO or NO INFO capsule. Participants came to the laboratory to ingest their capsules, and then returned to their normal environments where they completed subjective effects questionnaires every 2 h for 8 h. Expectancies influenced the subjective effects reported during the INFO session, regardless of whether subjects actually received AMP or placebo: subjects who expected a stimulant had higher ratings of “feel drug” and “like drug”. The pharmacological effects of AMP were also evident on the INFO sessions: AMP produced its prototypic subjective effects regardless of subjects' expectancies. Significant interactions between drug and expectancy were obtained on self-report measures of anxiety and arousal: anxiety was higher for groups who received substances that did not match their expectations (P/S and S/P) and arousal increased most in volunteers who expected placebo but received stimulant. Choice of drug was determined primarily by pharmacology: participants who received AMP on the INFO session usually chose that capsule, regardless of information about its identity (P/S: 8/10; S/S: 9/10). In contrast, participants who received placebo on the INFO session chose this capsule at chance levels, regardless of information about its identity (S/P: 3/10; P/P: 6/10). Thus, expectancy influenced some of the subjective effects of AMP and placebo, but the pharmacological effects of the AMP were instrumental in determining whether volunteers would self-administer the drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn). American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer MC, Schippers GM, van der Staak CPF (1993) Alcohol and social anxiety in women and men: pharmacological and expectancy effects. Addict Behav 18: 117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wit H, Chutuape, MD (1993) Increased ethanol choice in social drinkers following ethanol preload. Behav Pharmacol 4: 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L (1983) SCL-90-R manual II. Clinical Psychometric Research, Towson, Md.

  • Fillmore MT, Vogel-Sprott M (1995) Behavioral effects of combining alcohol and caffeine: contribution of drug-related expectancies. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 3: 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore MT, Mulvihill LE, Vogel-Sprott M (1994) The expected drug and its expected effect interact to determine placebo responses to alcohol and caffeine. Psychopharmacology 115: 383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman MS, Brown SA, Christiansen BA (1987) Expectancy theory: thinking about drinking. In: Blane HT, Leonard KE (eds) Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism. Guilford, New York, pp 181–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull JG, Bond CF (1986) Social and behavioral consequences of alcohol consumption and expectancy: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 99: 347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH (1980) Drug preference and mood in humans:d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 71: 275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Kilgore K, Uhlenhuth EH (1983) Assessment of dependence potential of drugs in humans using multiple indices. Psychopharmacology 81: 144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Laberg JC (1986) Alcohol and expectancy: subjective, psychophysiological and behavioral responses to alcohol stimuli in severely, moderately and non-dependent drinkers. Br J Addict 81: 797–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Laberg JC, Löberg T (1989) Expectancy and tolerance: a study of acute alcohol intoxication using the balanced placebo design. J Stud Alcohol 50: 448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyerley SB, Ross S, Krugman AD, Clyde DJ (1964) Drugs and placebos: the effects of instructions upon performance and mood under amphetamine sulphate and chloral hydrate. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 68: 321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyvers MF, Maltzman I (1991a) Selective effects of alcohol on Wisconsin card sorting test performance. Br J Addict 86: 399–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyvers MF, Maltzman I (1991b) The balanced placebo design: effects of alcohol and beverage instructions cannot be independently assessed. Int J Addict 26: 263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt GA, Rohsenow DJ (1980) Cognitive processes in alcohol use: expectancy and the balanced placebo design. Adv Subst Abuse 1: 159–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt GA, Deming B, Reid JB (1973) Loss of control drinking in alcoholics: an experimental analogue. J Abnorm Psychol 3: 233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin CS, Sayette MA (1993) Experimental design in alcohol administration research: limitations and alternatives in manipulation of dosage-set. J Stud Alcohol 54: 750–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin CS, Earleywine M, Finn PR, Young RD (1990) Some boundary conditions for effective use of alcohol placebos. J Stud Alcohol 51: 500–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Sloan JW, Sapira JD, Jasinski DR (1971) Physiological, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 12: 245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1971) Manual for the profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PG, Smith GT, Goldman MS (1990) Emergence of alcohol expectancies in childhood: a possible critical period. J Stud Alcohol 51: 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntaner C, Cascella NG, Kumor KM, Nagoshi C, Herning R, Jaffe J (1989) Placebo responses to cocaine administration in humans: effects of prior administrations and verbal instructions. Psychopharmacology 99: 282–286

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Boyle DJ, Binns AS, Sumner JJ (1994) On the efficacy of alcohol placebos in inducing feelings of intoxication. Psychopharmacology 115: 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveto AH, Hughes JR, Higgins ST, Bickel WK, Pepper SL, Shea PJ, Fenwick JW (1994) Forced-choice versus free-choice procedures: caffeine self-administration in humans. Psychopharmacology 109: 85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Penick SB, Fisher S (1965) Drug-set interaction: psychological and physiological effects of epinephrine under differential expectations. Psychosom Med 27: 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport JL, Buchsbaum MS, Weingartner H, Zahn TP, Ludlow C, Mikkelsen EJ (1980) Dextroamphetamine: its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37: 933–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretch R, Gerber GJ (1973) Drug-induced reinstatement of amphetamine self-administration behaviour in monkeys. Can J Psychol 27: 168–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore SW, Hinson RE (1991) The influence of setting on consumption in the balanced placebo design. Br J Addict 86: 205–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, S.H., Laurent, C.L. & de Wit, H. Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects ofd-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration. Psychopharmacology 125, 371–378 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246020

Key words

Navigation