Skip to main content
Log in

The neglected ameba: Dientamoeba fragilis

A report of 100 “pure” infections

  • Point Of View
  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. Of 14,000 patients studied over a period of 6 years, 2.4% were infected withD. fragilis. The majority were U. S. citizens who had not traveled out of the country.

2. The 100 cases of “pure” infection withD. fragilis are summarized.

3. Diagnosis was made by direct examination of recently passed loose stools combined with culture.

4. The most frequent presenting symptoms were abdominal pain, diarrhea, flatus, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue.

5. Physical signs, proctoscopic examination, and radiologic study usually were negative.

6. Treatment eliminated the parasite although evaluation of symptomatic relief was often difficult.

7.D. fragilis is considered by many to be nonpathogenic and is often ignored. Such appears unjustified in view of cases reported in the literature and cases reviewed. Specific therapy seems warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jepps, M. W., andDobell, C. Dientamoeba fragilis, n. g. n.w., a new intestinal amoeba from man.Parasitology 10:352, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dobell, C. The Ameba Living in Man. Wm. Wood and Co., New York, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wenyon, C. M., andO'Connor, F. W. Human Intestinal Protozoa in the Near East. London, 1917.

  4. Svensson, R. A survey of human intestinal protozoa in Sweden and Finland (A preliminary report).Parasitology 20: 237, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brug, S. L. Observations on D. fragilis.Ann Trop Med Parasit 30:441, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stabler, R. M. Intestinal protozoa in 106 parasitology students.J Parasit 27:90, 2941.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wenrich, D. H., Stabler, R. M., andArnett, J. H. E. histolytica and other intestinal protozoa in 1060 college freshmen.Amer J Trop Med 15:331, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wenrich, D. H., andArnett, J. H. Results of a protozoological survey of food handlers at a professional school in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Amer J Trop Med 22:102, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hood, M. Diarrhea caused by D. fragilis.J Lab Clin Med 25:914, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sapero, J. J. Clinical studies in non-dysenteric intestinal amebiasis.Amer J Trop Med 19:497, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talis, B., andStein, B. The presence of D. fragilis in the gallbladder.Harefuah 61:125, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tumka, A. F. Two cases of isolation of D. fragilis and the problem of species independence of these amebae.Med Parazet (Moskva)32:9, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gittings, I. C, andWaltz, A. D. D. fragilis.Amer J Dis Child 34:542, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mollari, M, andAnzulovic, N. V. Cultivation and pathogenicity of D. fragilis with a case report.J Trop Med 4:246, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knoll, E. W., andHowell, K. M. Studies on D. fragilis. Its incidence and possible pathogenicity.Amer J Clin Path 15:178, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hakansson, E. G. D. fragilis, a cause of illness. Report of a case.Amer J Trop Med 16:175, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hakansson, E. G. D. fragilis, some further observations.Amer J Trop Med 17:349, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hakansson, E. G. The use of aqueous smears in the study and identification of the amebae of man.Amer J Trop Med 15:439, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wenrich, D. H. Studies on D. fragilis (Protozoa). IV. Further observations with an outline of present day knowledge of this species.J Parasit 30:322, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burrows, R. B., andSwerdlow, M. A. E. vermicularis as a probable vector of D. fragilis.Amer J Trop Med 5:258, 1956.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamy, L. Dientamoeba fragilis, recherche, culture, frequence, interet et caracteres pathogenes.Bull Soc Path Exot 53:505, 1960.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dobell, C. Researches on the intestinal protozoa in monkeys and Man. X. The life history of D. fragilis: Observations, experiments, and speculations.Parasitology 32:417, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Keegan, G., and Marsden, P. D. Personal communication, Oct. 8, 1965.

  24. Kudo, R. Observations on D. fragilis.Amer J Trop Med 6:299, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Swerdlow, M. A., andBurrows, R. B. D. fragilis. An intestinal pathogen.JAMA 158:176, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burrows, R. B. et al. Pathology of Dientameba fragilis infections of the appendix.Amer J Trop Med 3: 1033, 1954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sapero, J. J., andJohnson, C. M. Incidence of E. histolytica and other intestinal parasites in variously exposed groups of the Navy.U S Naval Med Bull 37:279, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rothman, M. M., andLasky, M. Survey of protozoan infection of the staff of a large general hospital.Amer J Med Sci 206:369, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brooke, M. M., Donaldson, A. W., Brown, E. An Amebiasis Survey in a Veterans Administration Hospital, Chamblee, Georgia, with Comparison of Technics.Amer J Trop Med 3: 615, 1954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brooke, M. M., Heeren, R. H., Sawyer, G. M., Stoner, D. Mass Therapy in Attempted Control of Amebiasis in a Mental Institution.Public Health Rep 73:499, 1958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weiner, D., Brooke, M. M., Witkow, A. Investigation of parasitic infections in the central area of Philadelphia.Amer J Trop Med 8:625, 1959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Melvin, D. M., Brooke, M. M. Parasitologic surveys on Indian reservations in Montana, South Dakota, New Mexico, Arizona, and Wisconsin.Amer J Trop Med 11:765, 1962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brooke, M. M., Healy, G. R., Levy, P., Kaiser, R. L., Bunch, W. L. A sample survey of selected areas in and near Little Rock, Arkansas, to assess the prevalence of entamoeba histolytica.Bull World Health Organ 29:813, 1963.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Elsdon-Dew, R. Personal communication, 1964.

  35. Brooke, M. M. Personal communication, 1965.

  36. Brooke, M. M., Gleason, N., Montero-Gei, F. Intestinal parasites in a rural community of Costa Rica.Rev Biol Trop Univ Costa Rica 11:47, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Svensson, R., andLinders, F. J. The chance of detecting infections with intestinal protozoa.Acta Med Scand 81:267, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Svensson, R. Studies on human intestinal protozoa, especially with regard to their demonstrability and the connection between their distribution and hygienic conditions.Acta Med Scand Suppl 70:1, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kean, B.H., Malloch, C.L. The neglected ameba: Dientamoeba fragilis. Digest Dis Sci 11, 735–746 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239427

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239427

Keywords

Navigation