Skip to main content
Log in

Drug abuse, crime costs, and the economic benefits of treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have examined the social consequences and costs of criminal activity. The most popular approach for estimating the costs of crime focuses on easily measurable factors such as incarceration costs, victims' out-of-pocket expenses, medical costs, and lost earnings. However, the intangible losses incurred by victims of crime have rarely been considered. These losses include pain and suffering, as well as loss of the enjoyment of living. Based on recent developments by Cohen and colleagues, we adopt a more comprehensive method for estimating the dollar value of avoided criminal activity, taking into account these intangible losses. We demonstrate the feasibility of this method by estimating the pre- and posttreatment costs of criminal activity for a sample of 2420 drug abusers. The estimated crime-related costs incurred during the period prior to treatment admission and the period after treatment discharge are significantly higher when calculated using the proposed method compared to methods that only consider tangible costs. Furthermore, a simple benefit-cost comparison of criminal activity outcomes indicates that drug abuse treatment has the potential to return net benefits to society through crime reduction. Although the treatment outcomes are not based on an experimental design, this study presents quantitative evidence that including victims' intangible losses can substantially raise the estimated dollar benefits of avoided criminal activity due to drug abuse interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. M. (1992). A sober look at the costs of intoxication.Contemp. Policy Issues 10: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apsler, R. (1991). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of drug abuse treatment services. InEconomic Costs, Cost-Effectiveness, Financing, and Community-Based Drug Treatment, National Institute of Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 113, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, pp. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur D. Little Company (1974).Social Cost of Drug Abuse, Report for the Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention of the Executive Office of the President, Cambridge, MA.

  • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach.J. Polit. Econ. 76: 169- 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyum, D., and Kleiman, M. A. R. (1995). Alcohol and other drugs. In Wilson, J. Q., and Petersilia, J. (eds.),Crime, Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco, pp. 295- 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, A. J., Deutsch, J., Hakim, S., Spiegel, U., and Weinblatt, J. (1991). A Von Thunen model of crime, casinos and property values in New Jersey.Urban Stud. 28(5): 673–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, A. J., Hakim, S., and Spiegel, U. (1993). Endogenous crime victimization, taxes and property values.Soc. Sci. Q. 74(2): 334–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, B. (1993). Teaching about judgments of crime seriousness.Teach. Sociol. 21: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. M., and Williams, T. (1993). Perspectives on the seriousness of crimes.Soc. Sci. Res. 22: 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J., and Chaiken, M. (1982).Varieties of Criminal Behavior, RAND Corp. (R-2814-ICJ), Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T., and Seeley, R. D. (1979). The private costs of crime. In Gray, C. M. (ed.),The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. (1988). Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims.Law Society Rev. 22(3): 537–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., and Miller, T. R. (1995). The cost of mental health care for victims of crime. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. J., Rachal, J. V., Hubbard, R. L., Cavanaugh, E. R., Craddock, S. G., and Kristiansen, P. L. (1982).Criminality in a Drug Treatment Sample: Measurement Issues and Initial Findings, RTI/1901/01-07S, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. J., Hubbard, R. L., Cavanaugh, E. R., and Rachal, J. V. (1983).Criminal Behavior Before and During Drug Treatment: 1979–1981 Admission Cohorts, RTI/1901/01-03S, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. J., Schlenger, W. E., and Jordan, B. K. (1988). Antisocial personality and substance abuse disorders.Bull. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 16: 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condelli, W. S., and Dunteman, G. H. (1993a). Exposure to methadone programs and heroin use.Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 19: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condelli, W. S., and Dunteman, G. H. (1993b). Issues to consider when predicting retention in therapeutic communities.J. Psychoact. Drugs 25: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J., and Graham, D. A. (1977). The demand for insurance and protection: The case of irreplaceable commodities.Q. J. Econ. 91: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B. S., and Rice, D. P. (1976). The economic cost of illness revisited.Soc. Secur. Bull. 39(2): 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruze, A. M., Harwood, H. J., Kristiansen, P., and Collins, J. J. (1981).Economic Costs to Society of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1977, Report prepared for the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Link, B., Travis, L. F., and Wozniak, J. F. (1985). Consensus in crime seriousness: Empirical reality or methodological artifact?Criminology 23(1): 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzon, P. M., and Lillard, L. A. (1983). Settlement out of court: The disposition of medical malpractice claims.J. Legal Stud. 12: 345–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilulio, J. J., and Piehl, A. M. (1991). Does prison pay?Brookings Rev. 4: 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. S. (1981).Measuring the Seriousness of Crime: Methodological Issues and a Cross Cultural Comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everingham, S. S., and Rydell, P. C. (1994).Modeling the Demand for Cocaine, MR-332-ONDCP/A/DPRC, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., Chestnut, L., and Violette, D. (1989). The value of reducing risks to death: A note on new evidence.J. Policy Anal. Manage. 8: 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. (1996). Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it?J. Econ. Perspect. 10(1): 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., and Martin, R. F. (1996). The costs of drug abuse consequences: A summary of research findings.J. Substance Abuse Treat. 13(6): 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., and Mauskopf, J. A. (1992). A quality-of-life method for estimating the value of avoiding morbidity.Am. J. Public Health 82(11): 1553–1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., and Zarkin, G. A. (1992). The effects of drug abuse treatment on legal and illegal earnings.Contemp. Policy Issues 10(2): 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., Rachal, J. V., and Hubbard, R. L. (1991). A conceptual framework for estimating the social cost of drug abuse.J. Health Social Policy 2(3): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., Zarkin, G. A., Hubbard, R. L., and Rachal, J. V. (1993). The effects of time in drug abuse treatment and employment on posttreatment drug use and criminal activity.Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 19(1): 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., Mauskopf, J. A., Teague, J. L., and Roland, J. (1996). Estimating the dollar value of health outcomes from drug abuse interventions.Med. Care 34(9): 890–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M. (1979). The costs of crime: Review and overview. In Gray, C. M. (ed.),The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M., and Joelson, M. R. (1979). Neighborhood crime and the demand for central city housing. In Gray, C. M. (ed.),The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ?Am. Econ. Rev. 81: 635–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, H. J., Napolitano, D. M., Kristiansen, P., and Collins, J. J. (1984).Economic Costs to Society of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1980, Report prepared for the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, H. J., Hubbard, R. L., Collins, J. J., and Rachal, J. V. (1988). The costs of crime and the benefits of drug abuse treatment: A cost-benefit analysis using TOPS data. InCompulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, Research Monograph Series 86, National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heien, D. M., and Pittman, D. J. (1989). The economic costs of alcohol abuse: An assessment of current methods and estimates.J. Stud. Alcohol 50(6): 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, D. A., and Fox, J. A. (1984).Urban Crime Control and Property Values: Estimating Systematic Interactions, Final report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice Grant No. 81IJ-CX-0063, Northeastern University, Center for Urban and Regional Economic Studies, Boston, MA, pp. 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. A., and Kopstein, A. (1984). Health care expenditures for major diseases in 1980.Health Care Financ. Rev. 5 (Summer): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, T. A., and Meiners, M. R. (1979).Guidelines on Cost-of-Illness Studies in the Public Health Service, Public Health Service Taskforce on Cost-of-Illness Studies, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. L., Collins, J. J., Allison, M., Cavanaugh, E. R., and Rachal, J. V. (1982). Validity of self reports of illegal activities and arrests by drug treatment clients.Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Meeting, 1981, American Statistical Association, Washington, DC, pp. 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., and Allison, M. (1984).Reliability and Validity of TOPS Data, RTI/1901/01-15Ss, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., and Ginzburg, H. M. (1989).Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. D., Goldstein, P. J., Preble, E., Schmeidler, J., Lipton, D. S., Spunt, B., and Miller, T. (1985).Taking Care of Business, D. C. Heath/Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. D., III (1979). The costs of victim compensation. In Gray, C. M. (ed.),The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury Verdict Research, Inc. (1994).Personal Injury Valuation Handbooks, Solon, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, J. S., and Pace, N. (1986).Costs and Compensation Paid in Tort Litigation (R-3391-ICJ), RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, D. (1994). Cost of illness approach. In Tolley, G., Kenkel, D., and Fabian, R. (eds.),Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, D. K., Saunders, B. E., and Veronen, L. J. (1987). Criminal victimization: Lifetime prevalence, reporting to police, and psychological impact.Crime Delinq. 33: 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaLonde, R. J. (1986). Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data.Am. Econ. Rev. 76(4): 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, R. H. (1988). Measuring welfare changes in settings with imposed quantities.J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 15: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, L. B., and Seskin, E. P. (1977).Air Pollution and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liappas, J. A., Jenner, F. A., and Vicente, B. (1988). Literature on methadone maintenance clinics.Int. J. Addict. 23(9): 927–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, S. A. (1988). Effects of violent crimes on residential property values.Appraisal J. 56: 341- 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J. R. (1992). An attempt at measuring the total monetary penalty from drug convictions: The importance of an individual's reputation.J. Legal Stud. 11: 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, F. S. (1993). Boxed in: Economists and benefits from crime.Int. Rev. Law Econ. 13: 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPheters, L. R. (1979). Measuring the costs of homicide. In Gray, C. M. (ed.).The Cost of Crime, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA pp. 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R. (1990). The plausible range for the value of life: Red herrings among the mackerel.J. Forens. Econ. 3(3): 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., and Rossman, S. B. (1993). Victim costs of violent crime and resulting injuries.Health Affairs 12(4): 186–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., and Wiersema, B. (1995).Crime in the United States: Victim Costs and Consequences, Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, May.

  • Miethe, T. D. (1982). Public consensus on crime seriousness: Normative structure or methodological artifact?Criminology 20: 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1959). Rent as a measure of welfare change.Am. Econ. Rev. 49: 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, A., and Zeckhauser, R. (1975). Introduction. InBenefit-Cost and Policy Analysis Annual, 1974, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, G. (1971). The economics of narcotics addiction: A new interpretation of the facts. InProblems of Drug Dependence, 1971, Proceedings of the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (1994a). Budget Summary. February,National Drug Control Strategy. Reclaiming Our Communities from Drugs and Violence, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (1994b). Budget Summary. February,National Drug Control Strategy Budget Summary, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paringer, L., and Berk, A. (1977).Cost of Illness and Disease, Fiscal Year 1975, Georgetown University, Public Services Laboratory, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L., and Votey, H. L., Jr. (1981). Establishing monetary measures of the seriousness of crime. In Phillips, L., and Votey, H. L., Jr. (eds.),The Economics of Crime Control, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, p. 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care.J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar, A. S., and French, M. T. (1994). Method and calculations for the tangible costs of crime. Working paper, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P., MacCoun, R., and Murphy, P. (1990).Money from Crime: A Study of the Economics of Drug Dealing in Washington, DC, RAND Drug Policy Center, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. P. (1994). Present values of expected future lifetime earnings and housekeeping services according to age and sex, 1990, Unpublished data, School of Nursing, Institute of Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. P., and E. J. Mackenzie and Associates. (1989).Cost of Injury in the United States: A Report to Congress, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, and University Injury Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp. 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. P., Kelman, S., Miller, L. S., and Dunmeyer, S. (1990).The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1985, Report prepared for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, University of California, San Francisco, Institute for Health and Aging, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M. J. (1979). The cost of crime to victims: An empirical analysis.J. Legal Stud. 8: 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, R., and Kind, P. (1978). A scale of valuations for states of illness: Is there a social consensus?Int. J. Epidemiol. 7(4): 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. A. (1978). Prosecutor perceptions of crime seriousness.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 69: 232- 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, P. C., and Everingham, S. S. (1994).Controlling Cocaine: Supply vs. Demand Programs, MR-331-ONDCP/A/DPRC, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrager, L. S., and Short, J. F. (1980). How serious a crime? Perceptions of organizational and common crimes. InWhite-Collar Crime: Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology and Economics, Inc. (1980). The consumer product safety commission injury cost model: Complete documentation, Unpublished.

  • Thaler, R. (1978). A note on the value of crime control: Evidence from the property market.J. Urban Econ. 5: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, G., Kenkel, D., and Fabian, R. (1994).Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (1994).1993 Injury Cost Data, from the Civilian Health and Medical Program for the Uniformed Services of the Department of Defense, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse (1994).National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates, 1993, DHHS Publication (SMA)94-3017, Washington, DC, Oct.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1991).Profile of Jail Inmates, 1989, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992a).Justice Expenditure and Employment, 1990, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992b).Prisons and Prisoners in the United States, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993a).Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, 1990, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993b).Correctional Populations in the United States, 1991, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993c).Criminal Victimization Data, 1973–1991, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1993d).Jail Inmates 1992, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1994a).The Cost of Crime to Victims, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1994b).Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1992, Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (1993).Crime in the United States: Uniform Crime Reports, 1992, Washington, DC.

  • Varian, H. R. (1990).Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed., W. W. Norton, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1983).Risk by Choice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1986). The determinants of the disposition of product liability claims and compensation for bodily injury.J. Legal Stud. 15: 321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1993). The value of risks to life and health.J. Econ. Lit. 31(4): 1912–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., Tracy, P. E., and Singer, S. I. (1985).The National Survey of Crime Severity, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was prepared while the authors were employed by Research Triangle Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajkumar, A.S., French, M.T. Drug abuse, crime costs, and the economic benefits of treatment. J Quant Criminol 13, 291–323 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221094

Key words

Navigation