Abstract
Gender differences in treatment and in judgments of distributive and procedural justice were examined. Three hundred nine litigants who had been involved in arbitrated auto negligence lawsuits responded to exit surveys. Two mechanisms by which gender might influence justice perceptions were explored. First, we examined whether a “chivalry bias” might be operating, in which the procedures systematically favor women over men. If such biases occur, women might feel they had been treated more fairly because of egocentric biases. Results provided only modest support for the chivalry bias. While women received slightly better awards and perceived somewhat more control than men, these differences had no effect on perceptions of distributive or procedural justice. Second, we examined whether men and women differ systematically in the factors they use as indicators of distributive and procedural justice. On the basis of group-value theory we predicted that women might place more emphasis on standing or on outcome favorability. The study revealed that men and women did differ in how they defined distributive justice, with women placing more emphasis on their perceived standing and on their perceptions of the favorability of their outcomes. There were no substantial gender differences in how procedural justice was defined. Results are interpreted in terms of how women might be responding to insecurity about facing a justice system historically dominated by men.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.
Anderson, E. A. (1976). The “chivalrous” treatment of the female offender in the arms of the criminal justice system: A review of the literature.Soc. Prob. 23: 350–357.
Bernstein, I. S., Nagel, S., Cardasia, J., and Ross, C. E. (1979). Defendants' sex and criminal court decisions. In Alvarez, R. (ed.),Discrimination in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 339–354.
Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Bazerman, M. H., and Sheppard, B. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.
Bokemeier, J. L., and Lacy, W. B. (1986). Job values, rewards, and work conditions as factors in job satisfaction among men and women.Sociol. Quart. 28: 189–204.
Brett, J. M. (1986). Commentary on procedural justice papers. In Lewicki, R. J., Bazerman, M., and Sheppard, B. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 81–90.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., and Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972) Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal.J. Soc. Issues 28: 59–78.
Busch, P., and Bush, R. F. (1978). Women contrasted to men in the industrial sales force: Job satisfaction, values, role clarity, performance, and propensity to leave.J. Market. Res. 15: 438–448.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1978). Chivalry reexamined: Women and the criminal justice system. In Bowker, L. (ed.),Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA, pp. 197–223.
Chin, A., and Peterson, M. (1985).Deep Pockets, Empty Pockets: Who Wins in Cook County Jury Trials, Institute for Civil Justice, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
Clarke, S. H., Donnelly, L. F., and Grove, S. A. (1991). Court-ordered arbitration in North Carolina: Case outcomes and litigant satisfaction.Justice Syst. J. 14: 154–182.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Crosby, F. J. (1982).Relative Deprivation and Working Women, Oxford University Press, New York.
Curran, D. A. (1983). Judicial discretion and defendant's sex.Criminology 21: 41–58.
D'Arcy, C., Syrotuik, J., and Siddique, C. M. (1984). Perceived job attributes, job satisfaction, and psychological distress: A comparison of working men and women.Hum. Rel. 37: 603–611.
Erickson, B., and Nosanchuk, T. A. (1977).Understanding Data, McGraw-Hill Reyerson Ltd., Toronto, Canada.
Forgionne, G. A., and Peeters, V. E. (1982). Differences in job motivation and satisfaction among female and male managers.Hum. Rel. 35: 101–118.
Fry, L. W., and Greenfield, S. (1980). An examination of attitudinal differences between policewomen and policemen.J. Appl. Psychol. 65: 123–126.
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of the self and morality.Harvard Educ. Rev. 47: 431–446.
Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Glick, P., and Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70: 491–512.
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano R. (ed.),Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R. O., and Capwell, D. F. (1957).Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinion, Psychological Services of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Hodson, R. (1989). Gender differences in job satisfaction: Why aren't women more dissatisfied?Sociol. Quart. 30: 385–399.
Huo, Y. J., Smith, H., Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer?Psychol. Sci. 7: 40–45.
Jurik, N. C., and Halemba, G. J. (1984). Gender, working conditions and the job satisfaction of women in a non-traditional occupation: Female correctional officers in men's prisons.Sociol. Quart. 25: 551–566.
Komaki, J., Waddell, W. M., and Pearce, M. G. (1977). The applied behavior analysis approach and individual employees: Improving performance in two small businesses.Organ. Behav. Hum. Perf. 19: 337–352.
Kruttschnitt, C. (1982). Women, crime, and dependency.Criminology 19: 495–513.
Lambert, S. J. (1991). The combined effects of job and family characteristics on the job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation of men and women workers.J. Organ. Behav. 12: 341–363.
Lawler, E. E. (1981).Pay and Organization Development, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., and Willis, R. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 27–55.
Lind, E. A. (1990).Arbitrating High-Stakes Cases: An Evaluation of Court-Annexed Arbitration in a United States District Court, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 952–959.
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. L., and Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic.Admin. Sci. Quart. 38: 224–251.
Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39: 643–653.
Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural justice judgments.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21: 19–29.
Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 4: 338–350.
Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. E., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., and Tyler, T. (1990). In the eye of the beholder: Tort litigants' evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system.Law Soc. Rev. 24: 953–996.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. B., and Ebener, P. A. (1988).Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program, Institute for Civil Justice, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1991). Alternative dispute resolution in the courts. In Kagehiro, D., and Laufer W. (eds.),Handbook of Psychology and Law, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 95–118.
Major, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In Shayer, P., and Hendricks, C. (eds.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 124–148.
Major, B., and Adams, J. B. (1983). Role of gender, interpersonal orientation, and self-presentation in distributive justice behavior.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 598–608.
Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick, D., and Cook, K. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 61–94.
Mottaz, C. (1986). Gender differences in work satisfaction, work-related rewards and values, and the determinants of work satisfaction.Hum. Rel. 39: 359–378.
Moulds, E. F. (1980). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. In Datesman, S., and Scarpitti, F. (eds.),Women, Crime, and Justice, Oxford, New York, pp. 275–299.
Mowday, R. T. (1991). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In Steers, R., and Porter, L. (eds.),Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 111–131.
Pollak, O. (1950).The Criminality of Women. A. S. Barnes, New York.
Sauser, W. I., Jr., and York, C. M. (1978). Sex differences in job satisfaction: A re-examination.Personnel Psychol. 31: 537–547.
Shapiro, J., and Stern, L. (1975). Job satisfaction: Male and female, professional and nonprofessional workers.Personnel J. 54: 388–389.
Smith, D. B., and Plant, W. T. (1982). Sex differences in job satisfaction of university professors.J. Appl. Psychol. 67: 249–251.
Sweeney, P. D., and McFarlin, D. B. (1992). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Paper presented at meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Plenum, New York.
Tyler, T. R. (1990)Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 67: 850–863.
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1990). Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: When does group membership matter?J. Soc. Issues 46: 83–94.
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, pp. 115–192.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., and Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48: 72–81.
Varca, P. E., Shaffer, G. S., and McCauley, C. D. (1983). Sex differences in job satisfaction revisited.Acad. Manage. J. 26: 348–353.
Visher, C. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry.Criminology 21: 5–28.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Bersheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Weaver, C. (1974). Correlates of job satisfaction: Some evidence from the national surveys.Acad. Manage. J. 17: 373–375.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-997-0016-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulik, C.T., Lind, E.A., Ambrose, M.L. et al. Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice. Soc Just Res 9, 351–369 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196990
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196990