Skip to main content
Log in

Can social bees be influenced to choose a specific feeding station by adding the scent of the station to the hive air?

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavioral response of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) and bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.) to the flower volatiles 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and myrcene isolated in situ from white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and oil seed rape (Brassica napus oleifera), respectively, were investigated on a rotating arena with 12 visually identical, but differently scented, feeding stations. When locating a feeding station, neutral in both shape and color, foragers used scent as orientation cue. Introduction of 2-ethyl-1-hexanol to the honeybee hives induced significantly more visits to sites containing this compound. In contrast, introduction of myrcene to the hives did not influence the foraging choices of honeybees significantly. No effect of hive scent composition on the choices made by bumblebees could be detected. “Experienced” bumble bees, i.e., bees with more than five visits to the feeding stations, tended to visit a particular position on the arena without discriminating between the two volatiles. In contrast, honeybees showed no positioning behavior on the arena, using primarily odoriferous stimuli. The observed influences of addition of scents to the hives are discussed in relation to the general knowledge on foraging behavior of social bees and the emission of volatiles from leaves and flowers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beker, R., Daeni, A., Eisikowitch, D., andRavid, U. 1989. Volatiles of two chemotypes ofMajorana syriaca L. (Labiatae) as olfactory cues for the honeybee.Oecologia 79:446–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, H.E.M. 1987. Role of flower and pollen aromas in host-plant recognition by solitary bees.Oecologia 72:618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B.J., Young, A.M., Strand, M.A., andErickson, E.H. 1987. Pollination biology ofTheobroma andHerania (Sterculiaceae).Insect Sci. Appl. 8:301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, J.B. 1969. The influence of the odour of a honeybee colony's food stores on the behavior of its foragers.Nature 222:778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, J.B. 1970a. Insect Pollination of Crops. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, J.B. 1970b. The flower constancy of bumblebees.J. Anim. Ecol. 39:395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. von. 1950. Bees. Their Vision, Chemical Senses, and Language. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. von. 1965. Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. von. 1974. Decoding the language of the bee.Science 185:663–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansted, L., Jakobsen, H.B., andOlsen, C.E. 1994. Influence of temperature on the rhythmic emission of volatiles fromRibes nigrum flowers in situ.Plant. Cell Environ. 17:1069–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushkov, N.M. 1958. Problems of beekeeping in the USSR in relation to pollination.Bee World 39:81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, H.B., andOlsen, C.E. 1994. Influence of climatic factors on emission of flower volatiles in situ.Planta 192:365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, H.B., Friis, P., Nielsen, J.K., andOlsen, C.E. 1994. Emission of volatiles from flowers and leaves ofBrassica napus in situ.Phytochemistry 37:695–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J.T., Tollsten, L., andBergström, L.G. 1993. Floral scent—a check list of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques.Phytochemistry 33:252–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughrin, J.H., Hamilton-Kemp, T.R., Andersen, R.A., andHildebrand, D.F. 1990. Volatiles from flowers ofNicotina sylvestris, N. otophora andMalus xDomestica: Headspace components and day/night changes in their relative concentrations.Phytochemistry 29:2473–2477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughrin, J.H., Hamilton-Kemp, T.R., Andersen, R.A., andHildebrand, D.F. 1991. Circadian rhythm of volatile emission from flowers ofNicotina sylvestris andN. suaveolens.Physiol. Plant. 83:492–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matile, P. andAltenburger, R. 1988. Rhythms of fragrance emission in flowers.Planta 174:242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R. 1985. Learning in honeybees in an ecological and behavioral context, pp. 55–74,in B. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer (eds.). Experimental Behavioral Ecology. Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R. 1993. Associative learning in honey bees.Apidologie 24:157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, A., Towne, W., Kirchner, W.H., andKryger, P. 1987. The acoustic field of a dancing honeybee.J. Comp. Physiol. A 161:633–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O., andThien, B.T. 1986. Insect reproduction and floral fragrances: Keys to the evolution of the Angiosperms.Taxon 35:76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M.H., Fonta, C., andMasson, C. 1983. L'apprentissage olfactif chez l'Abeille et le Bourdon: une étude comparée par conditionnement associatif.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. III 296:501–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham-Delègue, M.H., Roger, B., Charles, R., andMasson, C. 1990a. Effect d'une préexposition olfactive sur un comportement d'orientation en olfactomètre dynamique à quatre voies chez l'abeille (Apis mellifera L).Insectes Soc. Paris 37:181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham-Delègue, M.H., Etievant, P., Guichard, E., Marilleau, R., Douault, P., Chauffaille, J., andMasson, C. 1990b. Chemicals involved in the bee-plant relationships.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:3053–3065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham-Delègue, M.H., Masson, C., andEtievant, P. 1991. Allelochemicals mediating foraging behaviour: the bee-sunflower model, pp. 163–184,in L.J. Goodman and R. C. Fisher (eds.). Behaviour and Physiology of Bees. CAB Int, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbands, C. R. 1954. Communication between honeybees: The response of crop-attached bees to the scent of their crop.Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London (A) 29:141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapel, C. 1962. Undersogelser over duftfodring af honningbier med henblik pä rødkløverens bestovning.Tidskr. Planteavl. 65:447–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, G.D., Loper, G.M., andBerdel, R.L. 1973. A bioassay for determining honey bee responses to flower volatiles.Environ. Entomol. 2:255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, A.M., Wells, P.H., andJohnson, D.L. 1969. Honey bee recruitment to food sources: olfaction or language?Science 164:84–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobsen, H.B., Kristjánsson, K., Rohde, B. et al. Can social bees be influenced to choose a specific feeding station by adding the scent of the station to the hive air?. J Chem Ecol 21, 1635–1648 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033666

Key Words

Navigation