Skip to main content
Log in

Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assesses the use of Marlex mesh in conjunction with anterior colporrhaphy for the correction of cystocele with or without urinary stress incontinence. A retrospective review was carried out of 12 years' experience with 142 patients undergoing a modified anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh. All patients had preoperative urodynamics. Pre- and post-operative symptoms were compared and patients were examined for recurrent prolapse and mesh complications. Mean follow-up time was 3.2 years. No patients experienced recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Three patients developed mesherosions into the vagina. There was a 74% success rate in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Marlex mesh used as a reinforcement for anterior colporrhaphy is effective in preventing recurrent anterior wall descent, with minimal complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paraiso FR, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee JC, Mitchinson AR. Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1423–1431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore J, Armstrong JT, Willis SW. The use of tantalum mesh in cystocele with critical report of ten cases.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955;69:1127–1135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nichols D. Anterior colporrhaphy. In: Vaginal surgery, 3rd edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989;239–268

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan JE. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for the treatment of recurrent stress incontinence.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:369–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan JE, Farrow GA, Stewart FE. The Marlex sling for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary stress incontinence: a 16 year review.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:224–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drutz HP, Buckspan M, Flax S, Mackie L. Clinical and urodynamics re-evaluation of combined abdominovaginal Marlex sling operations for recurrent stress urinary incontinence.Int Urogynecol J 1990;1:70–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Julian TM: The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1472–1475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan JE, Farrow GA, Stewart FE. The Marlex sling for the treatment of recurrent stress incontinence: a 16 year review.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:224–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris RL, Yancey CA, Wiser WL, Morrison JC, Meeks GR. Comparison of anterior colporrhaphy and retropubic urethropexy for patients with genuine stress urinary incontinence.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1671–1675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergman A, Elia G. Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five-year follow up of a prospective randomized study.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:66–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borstad E, Rud T. The risk of developing urinary stress incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:545–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editorial Comment: This is a retrospective review of a 12-year experience utilizing Marlex mesh placed and stabilized with interrupted sutures below the urethrovesical junction, combined with a traditional anterior colporrhaphy to treat symptomatic prolapse. The authors report a 100% success rate, in that no patient had recurrence of anterior wall prolapse greater than stage II. The procedure also was effective in treating concurrent genuine stress incontinence, with a respectable 74% success rate at 1 year postoperative urodynamic evaluation in a small subset of patients who received both pre- and postoperative testing. The erosion rate of the mesh into the vagina was 2%, compared to previously reported rates of 12.5%; 3.5% of patients experienced postoperative dyspareunia. Although these results in a large group of patients over an extended follow-up period appear promising, the description of the actual surgical procedure sounds more like a suburethral sling than a procedure that would give support to the entire length of the anterior vaginal wall. Studies by other centers are needed to confirm these findings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flood, C.G., Drutz, H.P. & Waja, L. Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J 9, 200–204 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901604

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901604

Keywords

Navigation