Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of antagonistic bacteria for suppression of bacterial ring rot of potato

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacterial strains with potential for biological control of bacterial ring rot of potato caused byClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus were isolated from the surface of potato tubers. Eighty-eight potential biocontrol candidates, selected on the basis ofin vitro antibiosis toC. m. sepedonicus, produced inhibition zones with radii ranging from 0.5 to 16 mm on test plates. All antagonistic isolates were screened in the greenhouse for biocontrol activity on micropropagated potato plantlets root-inoculated withC. m. sepedonicus. Eight strains consistently prevented infection of plantlets but there was no significant correlation between the width of the inhibition zone in thein vitro assay and ring rot suppression in the plant bioassay. Three strains that showed a high level of biological control potential were identified as a saprophytic enteric bacterium (strain 7G), anArthrobacter sp. (strain 16C), and a soil coryneform bacterium (strain 18A). These were tested in a field plot by co-inoculating cut seed potato tubers withC. m. sepedonicus and antagonists. Strains 7G and 18A significantly increased plant stand whereas 16C decreased disease incidence. The relative number of ostensibly ring rot-free progeny tubers was generally greater when antagonists were present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1987) Scheme for the detection and diagnosis of the ring rot bacteriumCorynebacterium sepedonicum in batches of potato tubers. EUR 11288. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg 21 pp.

  • Boylen CW and Mulks MH (1978) The survival of coryneform bacteria during periods of prolonged nutrient starvation. J. Gen. Microbiol. 105: 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee AK, Gibbins LN and Carpenter JA (1969) Some observations on the physiology ofErwinia herbicola and its possible implication as a factor antagonistic toErwinia amylovora in the “fireblight” syndrome. Can. J. Microbiol. 15: 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampi-Panno L, Fernandez C, Bustamente P, Andrade N, Ojeda S and Contreras A (1989) Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes caused byPseudomonas solanacearum. Am. Potato J. 66: 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH and Copeman RJ (1980) Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluorescent antibody staining procedure. Am. Potato J. 57: 457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH and McCann M (1990) Detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum in potato cultivars with different propensities to express ring rot symptoms. Am. Potato J. 67: 685–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH and McNaughton ME (1986) Evaluation of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detecting latent bacterial ring rot infections. Am. Potato J. 63: 533–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH and Slack SA (1984) Current status and prospects for detecting and controlling bacterial ring rot of potatoes in North America. Plant Disease 68: 841–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH, Wieczorek A and Kummer A (1988) An ELISA test for bacterial ring rot of potato with a new monoclonal antibody. Plant Disease 72: 874–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Cruz AR, Poplawsky AR and Wiese MV (1992) Biological suppression of potato ring rot by fluorescent pseudomonads. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 1986–1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamard P and De Boer SH (1994) Biological control of the bacterial ring rot disease of potato (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus) using a naturally occurring antagonistic bacterium. In: Lamatre M, Freigoun S, Rudolph K and Swings JG (eds). Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Versailles (pp. 909–914) INRA, ORSTOM, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner M and Winkelmann G (1991) Fermentation and isolation of herbicolin a peptide antibiotic produced byErwinia herbicola strain a111. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34: 565–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson H and Sirois JC (1961) Auxin production by species of Arthrobacter. Nature 191: 1323–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R and Hurwitz E (1965) Suppression ofPythium debaryanum by lytic rhizosphere bacteria. Phytopathology 55: 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler H (1983) Identification key for coryneform bacteria derived by numerical taxonomic studies. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129: 1433–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B (1981) Use of rhizosphere chitinolytic bacteria for biological control ofFusarium oxysporum f.sp.dianthi in carnation. Phytopathol. Z. 113: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp H (1970) Saprophytic coryneform bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 24: 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp H, Venema PAA, Harder W and Konings WN (1966) Production of riboflavin byArthrobacter globiformis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 29: 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 26: 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gamard, P., De Boer, S.H. Evaluation of antagonistic bacteria for suppression of bacterial ring rot of potato. Eur J Plant Pathol 101, 519–525 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874476

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874476

Key words

Navigation