Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological, ethological, and ethically sound environments for animals: Toward symbiosis

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are inconsistencies in the treatment and attitudes of human beings to animals and much confusion in thinking about what are appropriate conditions for using and keeping animals. This article outlines some of these considerations and then proposes guidelines for designing animal management systems. In the first place, the global and local ecological effects of all animal management systems must be considered and an environment designed that will not rock the biospherical boat. The main points to consider are the interrelatedness of living things with each other and the environment, the self-sustaining nature of ecosystems, and the importance of diversity in the stability and maintenance of ecosystems. These can and should be taken into account when assessing animal management. They are illustrated by examples of companion/urban dogs, as well as farm, zoo, and circus animals. The environment must also be considered from the point of view of the ethological needs of the animals. There are two possible approaches to this: (1) the reductionist approach, illustrated by the choice experimental tests; and (2) a holistic, evolutionist approach that concentrates on the degree of behavioral restriction and the identification of distress. The assessment of an animal's ethological needs, and thus the ethological soundness of an environment, must take into account the species needs (communication system, species-specific characteristics of the brain receptors and cognition) and the individual's needs (his past experience). The behavioral effects of domestication and how distress can be assessed are discussed. Different ethical positions toward animals and their treatment are briefly outlined, and it is argued that, provided animals are in ecologically and ethologically sound environments, their use by human beings is ethically acceptable. The animal-human association should be characterized by symbiosis—mutual benefit—rather than a parasitic or exploitative relationship—employer to employee, rather than master to slave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attfield, R. 1983.The ethics of environmental concern. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, E. B. 1975.The living soil. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilharz, W. 1988. Breeding birds to excel in modern farming systems.Proc. Pouth. Inform. Ex. Queensland: Goldcoast, 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter, K. 1976. The use of resources.Anim. Prod. 23:267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, D. 1983. Stereotypes as animal welfare indicators. InIndicators relevant to farm animal welfare, ed. D. Smidt. Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. E. 1975.Behavioural problems of dogs. Santa Barbara, CA: Amer. Vet. Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. M., and W. H. Meck. 1984. The numerical attribute of stimuli. InAnimal cognition. ed. H. C. Roitblatt, T. Beaver, and H. S. Terrace. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. 1976.The moral status of animals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzer, R. 1986. Behavioral, physiological and functional aspects of stereotyped behaviour. A review and reinterpretation.Journal of Animal Science 62:1776–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. 1980.Contemporary animal learning theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, R., and B. Rosier. 1969.The hungry future. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I. J. W. 1970. Frustration in the fowl. InAspects of poultry behaviour, ed. B. M. B. Freeman and R. F. Gordon, 15–31. Edinburgh: Poult. Sci. Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, I. J. W., and M. S. Dawkins. 1983. The problem of assessing “well-being” and suffering in farm animals. InIndicators relevant to farm animal welfare, 13–24.

  • Duncan, I. J. W., and C. Petherick. 1989. Society, Veterinary Ethology. Bristol, July.

  • Erlich, P., and A. Erlich, 1982.Extinction. London: Victor Gollanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, P., A. Erlich, and J. P. Holden. 1977.Eco-science. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, H., and M. G. Frank. 1982. Comparison of problem-solving performance in six week old wolves and dogs.Animal Behavior 30:95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, H., L. M. Hasselbach, and D. M. Littleton. 1987. Socialized versus unsocialized wolves (Canis lupus) in experimental research. InAdvances in animal welfare science, 1986–87, ed. M. W. Fox and L. D. Mickley, 33–50. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. G. 1983.Rights, killing and suffering. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, R. W., and P. Monyihan. 1987.Seabird ecology. Glasgow: Blackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. 1984.Animal thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Statistics on Agriculture. 1988. London: HMSO.

  • Harrison, R. 1964.Animal machines. London: Vincent Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearne, V. 1986.Adam's task: Calling animals by name. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. 1979. Acquisition, generalization and discrimination reversal of natural concepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology of Animal Behaviour Processes 5:116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B., and I. T. H. Duncan. 1988. The notion of ethological need. Models of motivation and and animal welfare.Animal Behavior. 36:1696–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM). 1985. W. Germany, 1987, Santz Cruz, CA.

  • Jensen, P. 1986. Normal and abnormal behaviour of animals. InEthics of animal experimentation. Acta. physiol. scand. 128. ed. M. Thelestran and A. Gunnarsson, 11–23.

  • Jerison, H. 1973.Evolution of brain and intelligence. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, A. C. 1984. Adaptation & cognition: Knowing what comes naturally. InAnimal cognition. ed. H. C. Roitblatt, T. Beaver, and H. C. Terrace, 533–544. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1969. Some displays in ungulates, canids and felids. Ph.D. thesis. University of Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1977. The behavioural problems of farm animals. Stockton: Oriel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1980. Problems of modern agriculture.Food Policy, August, 208–215.

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1983a. Ecological agriculture. A case study of an ecological farm in the south of England.Biology, Agriculture and Horticulture 2:101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1983b. The behaviour of confined calves raised for veal: Are these animals distressed?International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 4:198–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1986. Okologis che Ethologie und Ethik der Tierhaltung. InOkologische Tierhaltung, ed: H. H. Sambraus, E. Boehncke, 35–56. Müller Karlsruh.

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1987.The behaviour of horses in relation to management and training. London: J. A. Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. 1990.Animals in zoos and circuses. London: Little Ash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley-Worthington, M. In press. Symbiotic animal management, can it work?African Development, 9.

  • Kiley-Worthington, M., and S. de la Plain. 1983.The behaviour of beef suckler cattle. Basel: Birkhuser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, P. 1975. Bread basket for the Middle east.African Development 9:9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgeley, M. 1981.Animals and why they matter. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. 1981.Language and speech. New York: Feeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture. 1989. London: HMSO.

  • Morton, A. 1987. Weighing death against pain in people and animals. Paper presented at applied philosophy workshop on Ethics in Veterinary Medicine, Glasgow, March.

  • Odum, E. P. 1971.Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. 1974.Man's responsibility for nature. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, W. 1984.Man and mouse. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S. 1988.Animal cognition. Longmans.

  • Petherick, C., S. M. Rutter, and I. H. J. Duncan. 1989. Push-door for measuring motivation. Abstract. Bristol: Society for Veterinary Ethology. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. 1983. Animal rights, human wrongs. InEthics and animals, ed. H. B. Miller and W. H. Williams, 19–44. Clifton, NJ: Humana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitblatt, H. L., T. Beaver, and H. S. Terrace, eds. 1984.Animal cognition. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E. 1981.Animal rights and human morality. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E. 1989.Animal consciousness, animal pain and scientific change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston. 1983. Values gone wild.Inquiry 181–207.

  • Routley, V. 1975. Critical notice of Jon Passmore'sMan's responsibility for nature.Australian Journal of Philosophy 53:171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, A. 1986. Animal awareness. Are animals anxious? Paper presented at Delta Society Congress, Living Together: People, Animals and the Environment, Boston.

  • Saponziz, S. E. 1987.Morals, reason and animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S., and H. Rumbaugh. 1984. Acquisition of functional symbol usage in apes and children. InAnimal cognition. ed. H. C. Roitblatt, T. Beaver, and H. C. Terrace. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. P., and S. L. Fuller. 1964. Genetics and the social behaviour of the dog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. 1956.The physiology and pathology of exposure to stress. Chicago: Acta Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R. 1987. The cruel deception. InAdvances in animal welfare science, 1986/87, 9–18.

  • Sherpell, J. 1986.In the company of animals. Oxford: Blackwell's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoard, M. 1980.The theft of the countryside. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker, E. F. 1974.Small is beautiful. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1976.Animal liberation. London: Johnathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp-Dawkins, M. 1980.Animal suffering. The science of animal welfare. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp-Dawkins, M. 1989. From an animal's point of view. Consumer demand theory and animal welfare.Behavior and Brain Science. In press.

  • Stolba, A., and D. Wood-Gush. 1981. Verhaltensgliederung und Reaction auf Neurreise als ethologische Kriterien zuer Beurteiliung von Hattungs begingungen. InAngewandte ethologie bei haustieren. K. T. B. L. Damstadt.

  • Thomas, K. 1984.Man and the natural world. Changing attitudes in England, 1500–1800. Hammondsworth, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W. H. 1965. The assessment of pain and stress in animals. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the WElfare of Animals Kept under Intensive Livestock Systems. Chairman: R. W. R. Brambell. 2836. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C., and C. H. Honzik. 1930. Introduction and removal of reward, and maze performance in rats.Univ. Cla. Publ in Psychology 4:257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, C. 1980.The forest people. London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, I. 1966. Pain as a cause of aggression.American Zoology 6: 643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Federation of Animal Welfare (UFAW). 1981.Alternative to intensive husbandry systems. Potters Bar.

  • Universities Federation of Animal Welfare (UFAW). 1988. Behavioral needs of farm animals.Appl. Animal Behav. Sci. 19:339–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. 1983.Animal thought. New York: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiepkema, P. R. 1983. On the significance of ethological criteria for the assessment of animal welfare. InIndicators relevant to farm animal welfare. Holland: Martinus Nijhoff, 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayan, R. 1986. Assessment of pain in animals. Epistomological comments. EEC Report, 9742.EN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiley-Worthington, M. Ecological, ethological, and ethically sound environments for animals: Toward symbiosis. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2, 323–347 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01826810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01826810

Keywords

Navigation