Skip to main content
Log in

Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer

An ECOG Study

  • Viewpoints
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Eleven surgical pathologists studied microscopic sections from 45 mastectomy specimens of node positive breast cancer patients who had been entered into ECOG clinical trials. Inter-observer reproducibility for histoprognostic features was examined as a prerequisite before a subsequent evaluation of their possible clinical applicability could be undertaken. Histological type, nuclear grade, tubular formation, and lymphoid reactions were studied in the cancerous tissues. Lymph nodal responses (follicular and pulp prominence, sinus histiocytosis) were also examined in a manner that simulated slide review in routine surgical pathology practice. Numerous two-way comparisons of the pathologists' findings resulted in low levels of agreement (usually ≪90%). The degree of inter-observer reliability is clinically unacceptable using customary slide review analysis. New ways of examining breast cancer tissues need to be explored in the search for prognostic features which can be applied to the clinical management of breast cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Black MM, Speer FD, Opler SR: Structural representation of tumor-host relationships in mammary carcinomas. Biologic and prognostic significance. Amer J Clin Pathol 26: 256–265, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black MM: Human breast cancer. A model for cancer immunology. Israel J Med Sci 9: 284–299, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B et al.: The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from the findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4). Cancer 36: 1–85, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher ER, Redmond C, Fisher B: Histologic findings of breast cancer. Pathol Annual, Part I, 15: 239–250, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleiss JL: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many rates. Psychological Bull 76: 378–382, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stanley KE, Matthews MJ: Analysis of a pathology review of patients with lung tumors. JNCI 66: 989–992, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutter RVP: The interpretive art/science of pathology. CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 28: 141–145, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weigand RA, Isenberg WM, Russo J et al: Blood vessel invasion and axillary lymph node involvement as prognostic indicators for human breast cancer. Cancer 50: 962–969, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McDivitt RW, Stewart FW, Berg JW: Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Second Series, Fascicle 2, Tumors of the Breast, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, 1968, p 53

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer JS: Cell kinetic measurements of human tumors. Human Pathol 13: 874–877, 1982

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was conducted by the Breast Pathology Committee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Paul P. Carbone, M.D., Chairman, CA 21115) and supported by Public Health Service grants from the NCI, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilchrist, K.W., Kalish, L., Gould, V.E. et al. Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Tr 5, 3–10 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807642

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807642

Keywords

Navigation