Skip to main content
Log in

Toward an analysis of the educational value of film and television

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayfre, A.Le cinéma et sa vérité. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettelheim, B.Surviving. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, R. J.To serve the public interest: Educational broadcasting in the United States. Syracuse University Press, 1979.

  • Bruner, J.The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunstetter, M. R.How to use the educational sound film. University of Chicago Press, 1937.

  • Cassidy, M. F. Toward integration: Education, instructional technology, and semiotics.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, Summer 1982,30 (2).

  • Chute, A. G. Effect of color and monochrome versions of a film on incidental and task-relevant learning.Educational Communication and Technology Journal Spring 1980,28 (1), 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.Paolo Freire: His life, works, and thought. New York: Paulist Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Educational and Cultural Films.The film in national life. London: George, Allen & Unwin, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culkin, J. M., & Schillaci, A. (Eds.).Films deliver. New York: Citation Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, D. K. Future trends in the production of instructional materials.Educational Communication and Technology Journal Winter 1981,29(4), 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan, 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.Experience and education. New York: Macmillan, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. Can television teach?Screen Education, Summer 1979.

  • Ellis, D. C., & Thornborough, L.Motion pictures in education: A practical handbook for users of visual aids. New York: Crowell, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P.Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.Motion picture testing and research. U.S. Air Force, 1946.

  • Goldman, F.Need Johnny read? Dayton, Ohio: Pflaum, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. When is art? In D. Perkins and B. Leondar (Eds.),The arts and cognition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, K.Ethnographic film. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S.The logic of education. New York: Humanities Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Educational Planning.New educational media in action. Paris: UNESCO, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabel, J., & Halsey, A. (Eds.).Power and ideology in education. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J.A curriculum in film. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. L.Means of spreading thought among the natives. Brussels: Etablissement Généraux D'Imprimerie, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. & Lumsdaine, A.Learning from films. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, V. F. Form and discipline. In G. Mast and M. Cohen (Eds.),Film theory and criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisz, K., & Millar, G.Technique of film editing. New York: Hastings House, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G.Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. The powers and limitations of television. In P. Tannenbaum (Ed.),The entertainment function of television. Hillside, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E.The importance of selected audience and film characteristics as determiners of the effectiveness of instructional films. Lafayette, Ind.: U.S. Office of Education, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., Tiffin, J., & Seibert, W. E. Individual differences and instructional film effects.Journal of Educational Psychology 1965,56(6), 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J.An introduction to the analysis of educational concepts. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. The imagination of disaster. In Mast and Cohen (Eds.),Film theory and criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. M. The rise and decline of an educational technology: Television in American Samoa.Educational Communication and Technology Journal Fall 1980,28(3), 155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W.The sociology of teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadaner, D. Toward an analysis of the educational value of film and television. Interchange 14, 43–55 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805817

Navigation