Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does any enzyme follow the Michaelis—Menten equation?

  • Review and General Articles
  • a. review articles
  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A literature search has been conducted to see to what extent steady-state kinetics studies in the period 1965–1976 have revealed deviations from Michaelis—Menten kinetics. It was found that over 800 enzymes have been reported as giving complex curves for a variety of reasons and a group by group classification of all these enzymes has been carried out listing all the types of variations reported and the authors' explanations. In addition, for highly complex curves, we have determined the minimum degree of the rate equation. There were very few determined attempts to demonstrate adherence to the Michaelis—Menten equation over a wide variety of experimental conditions and substrate concentration and almost invariably detailed experimental work revealed unsuspected complexities. For these reasons, it is concluded that the assumption that most enzymes follow the Michaelis—Menten equation can not be supported by an appeal to the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleland, W. W. 1970. “Enzymes“ 3rd Ed. 2, 1–65.

  2. Childs, R. E. and Bardsley, W. G., 1975. Biochem. J. 145, 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shindler, J. S. and Bardsley, W. G., 1975. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67, 1307–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crabbe, M. J. C. and Bardsley, W. G., 1976. Biochem. J. 157, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bardsley, W. G. and Crabbe, M. J. C., 1976. Eur. J. Biochem. 68, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

  6. unpublished.

  7. Bardsley, W. G. and Childs, R. E., 1975. Biochem. J. 149, 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bardsley, W. G., 1976. Biochem. J. 153, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  9. King, E. L. and Altman, C., 1956. J. Phys. Chem. 60, 1375–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Volkenstein, M. V. and Goldstein, B. N., 1966. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 115, 471–475.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey, E., Stirpe, F., and Taylor, C. B., 1968. Biochem. J. 108, 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson, D. E. and Walton, G. M., 1965. J. Biol. Chem. 240, 757–763.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adams, J. B. and Low, J., 1974. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 370, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adams, J. B. and Edwards, A. M., 1968. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 167, 122–140

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schuster, S. M., Ebel, R. E., and Lardy, H. A. 1975. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 7848–7853.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Corwin, L. M. and Fanning, G. R., 1968. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 3517–3525.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kagan, Z. S. and Dorozhko, A. I., 1973. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 302, 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lé John, H. B., McCrea, B. T., Suzuki, I., and Jackson, S., 1969. J. Biol. Chem. 244, 2484–2493.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luzzatto, L., 1967. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 146, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mannervik, B., 1975. Biosystems, 7, 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerhart, J. C. and Pardee, A. B., 1963. Cold Spring Harbour Symp. Quant. Biol. 28, 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Graham, T. L. and Whistler, R. L., 1976. Biochemistry, 15, 1073–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Funkhouser, J. D., Abraham, A., Smith, V. A., and Smith, W. G., 1974. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 5478–5484.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berisch, H. W. and Hochachka, P. W., 1969. Biochem. J. 111, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beavo, J. A., Hardman, J. G.. and Sutherland, E. W., 1971. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 3841–3846.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Flawiá, M. M. and Torres, H. N., 1972. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 6880–6883.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tate, S. S., Len, F.-Y., and Meister, A., 1972. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 5312–5321.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ashman, L. K., Keech, D. B., Wallace, J. C., and Nielson, J., 1972. J. Biol. Chem. 247, 723–728.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bardsley, W. G., 1977. J. Theor. Biol. in press.

  30. Magaña-Plaza, I., Montes, C., and Ruiz-Herrera, J., 1971. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 242, 230–237.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Erlanger, B. F., Wassermann, N. H., Cooper, A. G., and Monk, R. J., 1976. Eur. J. Biochem. 61, 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patóka, J. and Bajgar, J. 1969. Febs. Letters, 2, 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hanes, C. S., Bronskill, P. M., Gurr, P. A., and Wong, J. T.-F., 1972. Canad. J. Biochem. 50, 1385–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tarmy, E. M. and Kaplan, N. O. 1968. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 2587–2596.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Griffin, J. B., Baker, A. P., and Hollocher, T. C., 1968. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 123, 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chlebowski, J. F. and Coleman, J. E., 1974. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 7192–7202.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kamogawa, A. and Fukui, T., 1975. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 403, 326–334.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weiser, M. M., Quill, H., and Isselbacher, K. J., 1971. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 2331–2337.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Horton, H. R., Swaisgood, H. E., and Mosbach, K. 1974. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 61, 1118–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gelb, W. G., Oliver, E. J., Brandts, J. F., and Nordin, J. H., 1970. Biochemistry, 9, 3228–3235.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Castoñsda-Agullo, M., Davila, G., Oliver, C., Cruz, T., and Del Castillo, L. M., 1969. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 191, 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Walker, E. J., Ralston, G. B., and Darvey, I. G., 1976. Biochem. J. 153, 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ziegler, I., 1974. Phytochemistry, 13, 2403–2410.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Locquet, J. -P., Saint-Blancard, J., and Jolles, P., 1968. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 167, 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mahmood, A. and Alvarado, F., 1975. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 168, 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, Y. C. and Wacek, V., 1970. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 138, 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moore, G. J. and Benoiton, N. L., 1972. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 47, 581–587.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Monod, J., Wyman, J., and Changeux, J., 1965. J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Manchester, St. Mary's Hospital, M13 0JH, Manchester, U.K.

    Charles M. Hill, Roy D. Waightm & William G. Bardsley

Authors
  1. Charles M. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy D. Waightm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William G. Bardsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, C.M., Waightm, R.D. & Bardsley, W.G. Does any enzyme follow the Michaelis—Menten equation?. Mol Cell Biochem 15, 173–178 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734107

Keywords

Search

Navigation