Skip to main content
Log in

Mouse mutants studied by means of ethological methods

I. Ethogram

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine in how far some known genes will affect the behaviour of mice (Mus musculus L.) the author used the ethological method for drawing up an inventory of behavioral elements; this can be considered the phenotype to be investigated.

For this purpose the behaviour was broken down into those elements presented by a solitary male (situation I), by two males placed together (situation II), and by one male and one female together (situation III). The environmental factors for the mice were kepts as uniform as was possible. In the present article an outline is given of the methods used in analysing that behaviour; in a later article it will be shown to what ends these methods can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, E. A. (1950). The nature and function of displacement activities. Symp. S.E.B.IV. Cambridge, Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, E. M. (1959). Time and motion study of prefihhting behavior in mice.Anat. Rec. 134: 532 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. A. (1958). Exploratory behaviour.Brit. J. Psych. 49: 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M., D. Morris &M. Moynhan (1953). Some comments on conflict and thwarting in animals.Behaviour 6: 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, F. J. (1956). Genetic and experiential factors affecting social reactions in male mice.J. comp. physiol. Psych. 49: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, E. A. &W. C. Allee (1945). Some effects of thiamin on the winning of social contacts in mice.Physiol. Zool. 18: 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, J. M., W. Bevan &B. F. Williams (1958). Spontaneous aggressiveness in young castrate C3H male mice treated with three dose levels of testosterone.Physiol. Zool. 31: 284–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, P. L. (1961). analysis of maternal effects in the inheritance of behaviour.Anim. Behav. 9: 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruell, J. H. (1962). Dominance and segregation in the inheritance of quantitative behavior in mice. In:E. L. Bliss, Roots of Behavior. New York, Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. B. (1956). A comparative study of the social behavior of two inbred strains of house mice.Eco. Monogr. 26: 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieterlen, F. (1962). Geburt und Geburtshilfe bei der Stachelmaus (Acomys cahirinus).Z. f. Tierpsych. 19: 191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1958). Das Verhalten der Nagetiere. In: Handbuch Zool. Bd. 8, Lief. 12, Berlin, W. de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1962). Technik der vergleichende Verhaltensforschung. In: Handb. Zool. Bd. 8, Lief. 31. Berlin, W. de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. F. (1962). Studies on the behavior ofPeromyscus maniculatus gambelii andPeromyscus californicus parasiticus, Behaviour 19: 177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. L. &W. R. Thompson (1960). Behavior Genetics. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, B. W. &M. M. Green (1962). Genotype, phenotype and mating behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster.Amer. Naturalist 96: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, E. &G. Schmidt (1960). Ratte und Maus. W. de Gruyter & Co, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (1962). Individual differences in behavior and their genetic basis. In:E. L. Bliss, Roots of behavior. New York, Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, G., H. Winston &M. Manosevitz (1961). Social dominance in inbred mouse strains.Nature 191: 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkow, J. (1960). Die Begattung bei der weissen Maus.Z. f. Tierpsych. 17: 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn, G. E. (1959). The genetics of mouse behavior in novel situations.J. comp. physiol. Psych. 52: 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn, G. E. (1961). Genotype and mouse activity.J. comp. physiol. Psych. 54: 674–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, T. E. (1962). Sexual behaviour in three inbred strains of mice.Behaviour 19: 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1956). The function and causation of courtship ceremonies. Fond. Singer-Polignac, Paris, Masson et Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J. (1961). Timidity and aggressive behavior of the rat.J. Hered. 52: 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen, D. D. (1961). Mouse exploratory behavior and body weight.Psych. Rec. 11: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1940). Die Übersprungbewegung.Z. f. Tierpsych. 4: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, R. E. (1961). Strain differences in sexual behavior of the male rat.Behaviour 18: 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. &J. P. Scott (1954). The development of social behavior patterns in the mouse in relation to natural periods.Behaviour 6: 35–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. D., S. A. Zerof &R. M. Carr (1962). Exploratory behavior of the crosses of three strains of rats.J. comp. physiol. Psych. 55: 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to ProfessorS. J. Geerts, Nijmegen, for suggesting the problem and reading the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Abeelen, J.H.F. Mouse mutants studied by means of ethological methods. Genetica 34, 79–94 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664181

Keywords

Navigation