Skip to main content
Log in

Which number of infecting bacteria is of clinical relevance?

Welche Anzahl von Bakterien ist für die klinische Infektion relevant?

  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The infective dose is the number of microorganisms required to produce infection in man. This value varies according to the mode of transmission, the virulence of the infecting agent and the host defense. The individual infective dose bears important implications with regard to epidemiology, prevention and therapy of the given infection. Theoretical remarks and relevant data from the literature are presented to help in the assessment of this basic problem in bacterial infectious diseases.

Zusammenfassung

Die infektiöse Dosis bedeutet die Anzahl von Mikroorganismen, die notwendig ist, um beim Patienten eine Infektion zu verursachen. Diese Größe hängt ab von der Art der Übertragung, der Virulenz des involvierten Erregers und der körpereigenen Abwehr des Patienten. Die individuelle infektiöse Dosis beeinflußt in hohem Ausmaß Epidemiologie, Prävention und Behandlung der jeweiligen Infektion. Es werden theoretische Überlegungen und relevante Daten aus der Literatur dargestellt, die mithelfen, diese grundsätzliche Problematik bei bakteriellen Infektionen zu beurteilen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Hornick, R. B., Greisman, S. E., Woodward, T. E., DuPont, H. L., Dawkins, A. T., Snyder, M. J. Typhoid fever: Pathogenesis and immunologic control (First of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 283 (1970) 686–691.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hornick, R. B., Greisman, S. E., Woodward, T. E., DuPont, H. L., Dawkins, A. T., Snyder, M. J. Typhoid fever: Pathogenesis and immunologic control (Second of two parts). N. Engl. J. Med. 283 (1970) 739–746.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Densen, P., Mandell, G. L. Phagocyte strategy versus microbial tactics. Rev. Infect. Dis. 2 (1980) 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DuPont, H. L., Hornick, R. B. Clinical approach to infectious diarrheas. Medicine 52 (1973) 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard, R. P. The Zermatt typhoid outbreak in 1963. J. Hyg. (Camb.) 63 (1965) 537–563.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asquith, M. T., Harrod, J. R. Reduction of bacterial contamination in banked human milk. J. Pediatr. 95 (1979) 993–994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll, L., Osman, M., Davies, D. P., McNeish, A. S. Bacteriological criteria for feeding raw breast-milk to babies on neonatal units. Lancet II (1979) 732–733.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, C. B., Chanock, R. M., Friedewald, W. T., Alford, R. H. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in volunteers. Annals NY Acad. Sci. 143 (1967) 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elek, S. D., Conen, P. E. The virulence ofStaphylococcus pyogenes for man. A study of the problems of wound infection. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 38 (1957) 573–586.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krizek, T. J., Robson, M. C. Evolution of quantitative bacteriology in wound management. Am. J. Surg. 130 (1975) 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loebl, E. C., Marvin, J. A., Heck, E. L., Curreri, P. W., Baxter, C. R. The method of quantitative burn-wound biopsy cultures and its routine use in the care of the burned patient. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 61 (1974) 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cleri, D. J., Corrado, M. L., Seligman, S. J. Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J. Infect. Dis. 141 (1980) 781–786.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman, W. E. Concentrations of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with bacterial meningitis. J. Pediatr. 88 (1976) 549–552.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaad, U.B. Which number of infecting bacteria is of clinical relevance?. Infection 11 (Suppl 2), S87–S89 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645294

Keywords

Navigation