Skip to main content
Log in

Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in incidence and lifetime risk of fractures are of major importance in the epidemiology of osteoporosis. We focused on hip fractures in women and men and on radial and humeral fractures in women. The study subjects comprised 4500 women and men 20 years old or more with fractures. In women 1735 fractures of the distal radius, 747 fractures of the proximal humerus, 878 cervical and 635 trochanteric hip fractures were included. In men 273 cervical and 232 trochanteric hip fractures were included. The fractures were registered during the period 1976 to 1984 and changes in age-specific incidence were calculated (chi-squared test for linear trend;p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant). On the basis of life tables and population background data, the lifetime risk was estimated. The incidence of cervical hip fractures in women aged 60–89 years decreased signficantly (p<0.05) during the observation period, while no significant decrease was found in the incidence of trochanteric fractures. No significant changes in incidence were observed in women with radial or humeral fractures, or in men with hip fractures. A woman 60 years old with a life expectancy of 81 years had an estimated residual lifetime risk of radial, humeral or hip fracture of 17%, 8% and 14% respectively. A man 60 years of age with a life expectancy of 77 years had an estimated risk of hip fracture of 6%. The residual lifetime risk of hip fracture for women surviving to the 25th percentile (88 years) was 32%, and in men (84 years) 15%. The causes of the observed decrease in age-specific incidence of cervical hip fractures in women are unknown, and prophylactic efforts to prevent hip fractures should continue to cover the healthy elderly women and men with expected longevity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mosbech J, Jørgensen J, Mac F. The distribution of diseases in patients in hospital 1987 [in Danish]. Ugeskr Læger 1989;151:3081–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buhr AJ, Cooke AM. Fracture patterns. Lancet 1959;1:531–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horak, J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop 1975;112:250–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rose SH, Melton LJ, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 1982;168:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Erin-Madsen J, Grum B, Horsnaes MW, Aalberg JR. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:75–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lauritzen JB, Schwartz P, McNair P, Transbøl I. The incidence of extremity fractures in women. In: Christiansen C, Johansen JS, Riis BJ, editors. Osteoporosis. Nørhave: Viborg, 1987:137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Owen RA, Melton LJ, Johnson KA, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL. Incidence of Colles' fracture in a North American community. Am J Public Health 1982;72:605–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alffram P-A, Bauer GCH. Epidemiology of fractures of the forearm: a biomechanical investigation of bone strength. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1962;44:105–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson LI, Ceder L, Svensson K, Thorngren K-G. Incidence of fractures of the distal and proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:721–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnell O, Nilsson B. Öbrant K, Sernbo I. Age and sex patterns of hip fracture: changes in 30 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:290–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zain Elabdien BSZ, Olerud S, Karlstrøm G, Smedby B. Rising incidence of hip fracture in Uppsala, 1965–1980. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:284–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wallace WA. The increasing incidence of fractures of the proximal femur: an orthopaedic epidemic. Lancet 1983;1:1413–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis F. Fracture of neck of the femur: changing incidence. BMJ 1981;283:1217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Öbrant KJ, Bengnér U, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Sernbo I. Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations? Calcif Tissue Int 1989;44:157–67.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zetterberg C, Elmserson S, Andersson GBJ. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Gøteborg, Sweden, 1940–1983. Clin Orthop 1984;191:44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melton LJ, Ilstrup DM, Riggs BL, Beckenbaugh RD. Fifty-year trend in hip fracture incidence. Clin Orthop 1982;162:144–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walløe A, Andersson S, Herrlin K, Lidgren L. Incidence and stability of trochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54:622–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Strand L, Melton LJ. Incidence of hip fracture in Saskatchewan, Canada, 1976–1985. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:502–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melton LJ, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Secular trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;41: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Näessen T, Parker R, Persson I, Zack M, Adami H-O. Time trends in incidence rates of first hip fracture in the Uppsala health care region, Sweden, 1965–1983. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130: 289–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rehnberg L, Olerud C. Incidence of hip fractures in the elderly, Uppsala County 1980–1987. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61:148–51.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WHO. Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death. Geneva: WHO, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Danish Statistical Yearbook, 1980. Life expectancy tables. Copenhagen: Danmarks Statistik, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yates F. The analysis of contingency tables with groupings based on quantitative characteristics. Biometrika 1948;35: 176–81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss NS, Ure CL, Ballard JH, Williams AR, Daling JR. Decreased risk of fractures of the hip and lower forearm with postmenopausal use of oestrogen. N Engl J Med 1980;303:1195–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hutchinson TA, Polansky SM, Feinstein AR. Postmenopausal oestrogen protects against fracture of hip and distal radius: a case-control study. Lancet 1979;2:705–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paganim-Hill A, Rose RK, Gerkins VR, Henderson BE, Arthur M, Mack TM. Menopausal estrogen therapy and hip fractures. Ann Intern Med 1981;92:28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson RE, Specht EE. The risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal females with and without estrogen drug exposure. Am J Public Health 1981;71:138–44.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kiel DP, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Wilson PWF, Moskowitz MA. Hip fracture and the use of estrogens in postmenopausal women: the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1169–74.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Danish National Health Board. Statistics: prevention and abortions 1980. Vitalstatistik 1986;1:17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Danish Statistical Yearbook. Copenhagen, 1988.

  32. Jensen GJ, Christiansen C, Boesen J, Hegedus V, Transbøl I. Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures: a unifying approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Orthop 1982;166:75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Azzawi F, Hart DM, Lindsay R. Long term effect of oestrogen replacement therapy on bone mass as measured by dual photon absorptiometry. BMJ 1987;294:1261–2.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ. Epidemiology and osteoporosis related fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985;7:178–208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauritzen, J.B., Schwarz, P., Lund, B. et al. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporosis Int 3, 127–132 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623273

Keywords

Navigation