Skip to main content
Log in

Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most observers agree upon the existence among traditional agriculturalists of a conservative attitude toward innovations and upon this conservatism being the rational result of a well-adapted set of existing techniques in combination with a marginal level of subsistence. This view, however, fails to take account of the readily demonstrated existence of both individual differences in agricultural practice and systematic experimentation within traditional agricultural communities. Such individuality and experimentation are probably pervasive in traditional societies, and must be seen as an essential component of their adaptive processes, as important as the more familiar processes of traditional transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alland, A. (1967).Evolution and Human Behavior. Natural History Press, Garden City, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, H. III, Child, I. L., and Bacon, M. K. (1959). Relation of child training to subsistence economy.American Anthropologist 61: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascom, W. R. (1948). Ponapean prestige economy.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 4: 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P., and Bohannan, L. (1968).Tiv Economy. Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. C. (1971). Personal communication.

  • Braidwood, R. J. (1967).Prehistoric Men. Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. (1966).Human Evolution. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1965). Variation and selective retention in sociocultural evolution. In Barringer, H. R.,et al. (eds.),Social Change in Developing Areas. Shenkman Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. C. (1957).Hanunoo Agriculture in the Philippines. FAO Forestry Development Paper 12.

  • Dalton, G. (1969). Theoretical issues in economic anthropology.Current Anthropology 10: 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. (1948).Empire's Children. Institute of Social Anthropology Publication. No. 6, Smithsonian Institution.

  • Frankel, F. R. (1969). India's new strategy of agricultural development: Political costs of agrarian modernization.Journal of Asian Studies 28: 693–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. D. (1955).Iban Agriculture: A Report on the Shifting Cultivation of Hill Rice by the Iban of Sarawak. Colonial Research Studies No. 18, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1969). The institutional aspects of peasant communities: An analytic view. In Wharton, C. R., Jr. (ed.),Subsistence Agriculture and Economic Development. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izikowitz, K. G. (1951).Lamet: Hill Peasants in French Indochina. Ethnologiska studier 17, Ethnografiska Museet, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. W. (1971a). Security and risk-taking among poor peasants: A Brazilian case. In Dalton, G. (ed.),Studies in Economic Anthropology. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. W. (1971b).Sharecroppers of the Sertäo: Economics and Dependence on a Brazilian Plantation. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds, A. (1961). Yaruro incipient tropical forest horticulture-possibilities and limits. In Wilbert, J. (ed.),The Evolution of Horticultural Systems in Native South America: Causes and Consequences. Sociedad de Sciencias Naturales La Salle, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1951).Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlan Restudied. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, R. (1956). Tabara: Subcultures of a tobacco and mixed crops municipality. In Steward,et al. (eds.),The People of Puerto Rico. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W. (1966).The Economics of Agricultural Development. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. W. (1969). The subsistence farmer in traditional economies. In Wharton, C. B., Jr. (ed.),Subsistence Agriculture and Economic Development. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. (1968).Hill Farmers of Nigeria: Cultural Ecology of the Kofyar of the Jos Plateau. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. (1967).Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. (1962).From Stone to Steel. Melbourne University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1964).Transforming Traditional Agriculture. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, J. (1969). An evaluation of the concept of carrying capacity.Professional Geographer 21: 104–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax, S. (1953).Penny Capitalism: A Guatemalan Indian Economy. Institute of Social Anthropology Publication No. 16, Smithsonian Institution.

  • Vayda, A. P., and Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Ecology, cultural and noncultural. In Clifton, J. A. (ed.),Introduction to Cultural Anthropology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1956). San Jose: Subcultures of a “traditional” coffee municipality. In Steward, J. (ed.),The People of Puerto Rico. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill., pp. 171–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, D. (1968). Personal communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, A.W. Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture. Hum Ecol 1, 149–159 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531352

Keywords

Navigation