Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency and intensity difference limens and nonlinearities in the ear of the housemouse (Mus musculus)

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Frequency and intensity difference limens were determined for the housemouse (Mus musculus, outbred strain NMRI) between 1 kHz and 80 kHz and for sound pressure levels (SPLs) between 15 dB and 100 dB re. 0.0002 dyn/cm2.

  2. 2.

    The frequency difference limens (Δf s ) decrease linearly with increasing SPL. The slopes (a) of the regression lines are frequency dependent (¦a¦=p·/tfq;p andq are constants) with ¦a¦ being maximal at 15 kHz. An intensity independent level of the smallest noticeable frequency differenceΔf m is reached at a definite SPL (L Δfm ) which is always 60 dB above the absolute hearing threshold (L HS ) at each frequency tested (L Δfm -LHS=const.). The relative frequency difference limenΔf m /f was nearly constant and equal to 0.85%.

  3. 3.

    The intensity difference limens (ΔL s ) decrease with increasing SPL. The interdependence can be approximated by a linear or a power function (ΔL s =−0.05·SL+7;ΔL s =0.04· SL+120·SL−1; SL=sensation level). The difference limens (ΔL s ) are frequency dependent (ΔL s =d·f e·SL) at low sensation levels. The equationΔI=g·I 0.95 (I=sound intensity) shows a near miss of Weber's law. The relative averaged difference limen (ΔL s /SL) amounts to 6.7% at 60 dB SL.

  4. 4.

    The results agree well with a model of a spectrum-excitation-transformation on the basilar membrane (Maiwald, 1967). In addition, a new frequency dependent nonlinearity of the mammalian ear is defined. It influences frequency and intensity discrimination in the same manner and can be expressed in a power function of the frequency summarized in the proportion:Δf∼ΔL s f z·L.

  5. 5.

    Comparative aspects of difference limens in man and other mammals are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Békésy, G. v.: Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. D.: The size of the differential limen for pitch. Amer. J. Psychol.53, 450–455 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmick, F. L., Olson, R. M.: The intensive difference limen in audition. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.12, 517–525 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, S.: Pitch and intensity discrimination by cats. Amer. J. Physiol.112, 1–4 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret, G.: Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice. Naturwissenschaften61, 506 (1974)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. N., McGee, T. M.: Effect of cochlear lesions upon audiograms and intensity discrimination in cats. Ann. oto-rhino-laryng.74, 386–408 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. N., Stein, L., Harrison, M. J.: Determination of absolute-intensity thresholds and frequency-difference thresholds in cats. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.32, 380–384 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R. R.: Auditory frequency discrimination in vertebrates. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.56, 206–209 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. L., Kiang, N. Y. S.: Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1f 2. Proc. IEEE.56, 981–992 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, M. H.: Auditory intensity discrimination in the rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.74, 315–318 (1971)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D.: Pitch discrimination. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.24, 750–755 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D.: Loudness discrimination. J. Speech Hearing Dis. Suppl.11 (1963)

  • Heffner, R., Heffner, H., Masterton, B.: Behavioral measurements of absolute and frequency-difference thresholds in guinea pig. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.49, 1888–1895 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M.: Audition in the white rat. J. comp. Physiol.26, 45–62 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang, N. Y. S.: Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., Res. Monograph35 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. O., Molnar, C. E., Pfeiffer, R. R.: A system of nonlinear differential equations modeling basilar-membrane motion. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.54, 1517–1529 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, V. O.: The sensibility of the ear to small differences of intensity and frequency. Phys. Rev.21, 84–102 (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, W., Schodder, G. R., Schröder, F. K.: Condenser transmitters and microphones with solid dielectrics for airborne ultrasonics. Acustica4, 19–32 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiwald, D.: Ein Funktionsschema des Gehörs zur Beschreibung der Erkennbarkeit kleiner Frequenz- und Amplitudenänderungen. Acustica18, 81–92 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J., Goldberg, J. P.: Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.44, 576–581 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J., Goldberg, J. P.: A study of near-miss involving Weber's law and pure-tone intensity discrimination. Perception Psychophysics4, 105–109 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, D. H., Ades, H. W.: Cortical and midbrain mediation of a conditioned discrimination of acoustic intensities. Amer. J. Psychol.59, 59–83 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, W. S.: Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.49, 1218–1231 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesz, R. R.: Differential intensity sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Phys. Rev.31, 867–875 (1928)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, L., Rhode, W. S.: Nonlinear effects in the transient response of the basilar membrane. In: Facts and models in hearing. (E. Zwicker and E. Terhardt, eds.) Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.: Discrimination of auditory intensities in the cat. Amer. J. Psychol.59, 127–136 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shower, E. G., Biddulph, R.: Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.3, 275–278 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, M.: Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats. J. exp. Anal. Behav.13, 145–160 (1970)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. F.: The effect of training procedure upon auditory frequency discrimination in the cat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.52, 186–190 (1959)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Die Grenzen der Hörbarkeit der Amplitudenmodulation und der Frequenzmodulation eines Tones. Acustica2, Beih. 3, 125–133 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Die elementaren Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Informationskapazität des Gehörs. Acustica6, 365–381 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear's frequency analysis. In: Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. (R. Plomp and G. F. Smoorenburg, eds.). Leiden: Sijthoff 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E., Feldtkeller, R.: Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger. Stuttgart: Hirzel 1967

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant to Prof. Dr. H. Markl (Ma 374/2 and 741,29-3), whom I wish to thank for his advice and critical discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehret, G. Frequency and intensity difference limens and nonlinearities in the ear of the housemouse (Mus musculus). J. Comp. Physiol. 102, 321–336 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464344

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464344

Keywords

Navigation