Skip to main content
Log in

Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article discusses the state of the science regarding the connection between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as reflected by the articles included in this issue. The research described in these articles reaches a conclusion in need of further elaboration—namely, that people will behave altruistically toward the oroganizations in which they work when they believe those organizations have treated them fairly. Various conceptual issues are discussed. These include: the willingness of people to express inequity distress by withholding OCB, the relative importance of procedural justice compared to distributive justice as a determinant of OCB (especially the social aspects of procedural justice), and the extent to which a reduction in OCB may reflect a desire to influence another individual, or the organization in general. A variety of methodological issues are also discussed. In this connection, it is suggested that correlational, questionnaire measures be supplemented by open-ended interview studies as well as laboratory investigations. Moreover, if questionnaires continue to be used, then it is recommended that attempts be made to improve the validity of both measures of justice and OCB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), 199–245. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 1–41. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1977),The Social World of the Child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 3), 141–183. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1990).The Protestant Work Ethic: The Psychology of Work Beliefs and Behaviors. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.),Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, 79–103. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990b). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 389–435. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1979). Equity, equality, and the Protestant ethic: Allocating rewards following fair and unfair competition.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 437–469. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (Ed.).Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, 211–267. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. (1982). Prosocial behavior, equity, and justice. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 261–308. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemer, M. J. (1982). The justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man: A radical analysis of facts and fictions. In Derlega, V., & Grezlak, J. (Eds.),Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research, 42–65. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1965/1932).The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1989).A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished working paper, Indiana University.

  • Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness.Social Justice Research, 1, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, J. Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 249–256 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419448

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419448

Key Words

Navigation