Conclusion
The Austrian theory of the marginal use raises almost as many problems as it has solved. We list here a few of these unsolved problems.
Complementarity and rivalness do lead to the ALEP criterion in the examples we worked out above, but we have made no attempt to formalize this rule into a general theorem. Intuitively, the ALEP condition must appear when the complementary or rival relationships are somehow active in the inner or outer marginal uses, but it is not clear exactly what the circumstances are under which this holds.
Although the theory leads to quasi-concavity of commodity preferences over goods in the particular cases we worked out, even when rival or complementary interactions are present, it has only been proven that this must be generally true when there are two goods, and then only in the case when the two goods are independent. Perhaps preferences do not really have to be quasi-concave after all.
And finally, it must be resolved whether the possibility of intrinsically ordinal preferences nullifies the von Neumann-Morgenstern axiom system, or if instead the validity of those axioms rules out intrinsically ordinal preferences.
After over a century, the Austrian theory is still in its youth. Perhaps the day has come for Felix Kaufmann's youngGrenznutzler to return from the netherworld of economic doctrine: There I will quietly lie in wait, Amid my neglected writings, Until I hear the trumpet call of Complementary Goods. Then through the sky will gallop Böhm-Bawerk, Polemics will thunder and flash! Then armed with a quill I'll rise up from the grave, To fight for theGrenznutzen school!27
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. G. D. Allen: Mathematical Analysis for Economists. New London 1962; originally 1938.
F. Alt: Über die Meßbarkeit des Nutzens, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie7 (1936), pp. 161–169.
R. Auspitz and R. Lieben: Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Preises. Leipzig 1889.
H. Bernardelli: The End of Marginal Utility Theory? Economica N. S.5 (1938), pp. 192–212.
A. Bilimovič: Wie können unmeßbare psychische Größen in das Gleichungssystem des wirtschaftlichen Gleichgewichts eingeführt werden? Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie5 (1934), pp. 145–184.
E. Böhm-Bawerk: Kapital und Kapitalzins, Innsbruck 1909. 1909A — First half-volume, “Positive Theorie des Kapitales”. 1909 B — Second half-volume, “Exkurse zur Positiven Theorie des Kapitals”.
E. Böhm-Bawerk: Capital and Interest. South Holland, Ill., 1959 (Translated by George D. Huncke and Hans F. Sennholz). 1959 II — Second volume, “Positive Theory of Capital”, corresponds to 1909 A. 1959 III — Third volume, “Further Essays on Capital and Interest”, corresponds to 1909 B.
B. de Finetti: La ‘logica del plausible’ secondo la concezione di Polya, Atti della XLII Riunione della Societa Italiana per il Progresse delle Scienze, 1949 (1951). (Not consulted by present author).
F. Y. Edgeworth: The Pure Theory of Monopoly, in Edge worth, Papers Relating to Political Economy, London, 1925. Vol. I, 111–142. (Retranslated from the Italian translation, published 1897 in the Giornale degli Economisti, of the lost English original).
M. Friedman and L. J. Savage: The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, Journal of Political Economy56 (1948), pp. 270–304.
N. Georgescu-Roegen: Choice, Expectations and Measurability, Quarterly Journal of Economics68 (1954), pp. 503–534. Reprinted in Georgescu-Roegen, Analytical Economics: Issues and Problems. Cambridge, Mass., 1966.
N. Georgescu-Roegen: Utility, In: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (D. S. Sills, ed.), New York 1968.
M. Grossman: The Economics of Joint Production in the Household, mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York 1974.
J. R. Hicks: Value and Capital, 2nd ed. Oxford 1946.
F. Kaufmann and F. Machlup: Ausgewählte Miseskreislieder, mimeo, Vienna 1935.
Ch. H. Kraft, J. W. Pratt, and A. Seidenberg: Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics30 (1959), pp. 408–419.
D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky: Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations, New York 1971.
K. J. Lancaster: A New Approach to Consumer Theory, Journal of Political Economy75 (1966), pp. 132–157.
K. J. Lancaster: Consumer Demand: A New Approach. New York 1971.
J. R. Lindgren: Adam Smith's Solution to the Paradox of Value, mimeo, Lehigh University 1976.
J. H. McCulloch: New Quasi-Concavity Restrictions on Allen and Direct Elasticities of Substitution, mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford, Calif., 1977.
J. H. McCulloch and J. D. Smith: An Austrian Proof of Quasi-Concave Preferences, Boston College Discussion Paper 70 (1975).
J. R. Meginniss: A New Class of Symmetric Utility Rules for Gambles, Subjective Marginal Probability Functions, and a Generalized Bayes' Rule, Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section, American Statistical Association (1976), pp. 471–476.
C. Menger: Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre: Erster, Allgemeiner Theil. Vienna 1871. Projected subsequent parts did not appear. Later reproduced (London: London School of Economics, 1934), with English introduction by F. A. Hayek.
C. Menger: Principles of Economics (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1950). Translation by James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz of Menger (1934). Introduction by Frank H. Knight.
R. T. Michael and G. S. Becker: On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior, Swedish Journal of Economics75 (1973), pp. 378–396.
O. Morgenstern: The Collaboration Between Oskar Morgenstern and John von Neumann on the Theory of Games, Journal of Economic Literature14 (1976), pp. 805–816.
O. Neurath: Nationalökonomie und Wertlehre, eine systematische Untersuchung, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik, und Verwatung (1911), pp. 52–114.
V. Pareto: Manuel d'Economic Politique, 2nd ed. Paris 1927. Translated from the Italian by Alfred Bonnet. First Italian edition, 1906.
G. Pirou: L'Utilité marginale de C. Menger à J.-B. Clark, 3rd ed. Paris 1945.
P. N. Rosenstein-Rodan: Grenznutzen, Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, 4th ed. Jena 1927. IV. pp. 1190–1223.
P. N. Rosenstein-Rodan: Marginal Utility, International Economic Papers10 (1960), pp. 71–106. Translation by W. F. Stolper of Rosenstein-Rodan (1927).
M. N. Rothbard: Towards a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics, In: On Freedom and Free Enterprise, Mary Sennholz, ed., New York 1956.
P. A. Samuelson: The End of Marginal Utility: A Note on Dr. Bernardelli's Article, Economica N. S.6 (1939), pp. 86–87. Reply by Bernardelli, pp. 88–89.
P. A. Samuelson: Complementarity: An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory, Journal of Economic Literature12 (1974), pp. 1255–1289.
R. Sato and K. Tetsunori: On the Elasticities of Substitution and Complementarity, Oxford Economic Papers25 (1973), pp. 44–56.
A. Smith: The Wealth of Nations, New York 1937; originally 1776.
H. R. Strotz: The Empirical Implications of a Utility Tree, Econometrica25 (1957), pp. 269–280. Correction by W. M. Gorman,27 (1959), and reply.
L. von Mises: Human Action, 3rd ed. Chicago 1966.
J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton 1953 (1st ed. 1944).
Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, Mass., 1963.
F. von Wieser: Über den Ursprung und die Hauptgesetze des Wirthschaftlichen Werthes. Vienna 1884. No translation.
H. A. Young: Preference Scales and Utility Functions, mimeo, University of Rochester 1969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is Scherman Research Fellow at NBER-West and Assistant Professor at Boston College. He is grateful for helpful suggestions made by J. R. Meginniss and by various participants in seminars at Boston College, at the Universities of Hartford and Chicago, at Stanford University, and at NBER-West.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCulloch, J.H. The Austrian theory of the marginal use and of ordinal marginal utility. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 37, 249–280 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291374
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01291374