Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure

  • Published:
Distributed and Parallel Databases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today's business enterprises must deal with global competition, reduce the cost of doing business, and rapidly develop new services and products. To address these requirements enterprises must constantly reconsider and optimize the way they do business and change their information systems and applications to support evolving business processes. Workflow technology facilitates these by providing methodologies and software to support (i) business process modeling to capture business processes as workflow specifications, (ii) business process reengineering to optimize specified processes, and (iii) workflow automation to generate workflow implementations from workflow specifications. This paper provides a high-level overview of the current workflow management methodologies and software products. In addition, we discuss the infrastructure technologies that can address the limitations of current commercial workflow technology and extend the scope and mission of workflow management systems to support increased workflow automation in complex real-world environments involving heterogeneous, autonomous, and distributed information systems. In particular, we discuss how distributed object management and customized transaction management can support further advances in the commercial state of the art in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Alsop, “Workflow Automation Integration Requires A Large Technology Toolkit and A Structured Approach,” Computer Technology Review, 1994.

  2. M. Ansari, L. Ness, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Sheth, “Using Flexible Transactions to Support Multisystem Telecommunication Applications,” Proceedings of the 18th Intl. Conf. on VLDB, August 1992.

  3. Action Workflow System product literature. Action Technologies Inc., 1993.

  4. D. Black, “Workflow Software: A Layman's Handbook, Part I,” INFORM, April 1994.

  5. A. Billiris, D. Gehani, H. Jagadish, and K. Ramamritham, “ASSET: A System for Supporting Extended Transactions,” Proceedings of SIGMOD, 1994.

  6. M. Bever, K. Geihs, L. Heuser, M. Muhlhauser, and A. Schill, “Distributed Systems, OSF DCE, and Beyond,”Proceedings of the DCE—The OSF Distributed Computing Environment, International DCE Workshop, Karlsruhe, 1993.

  7. Y. Breitbart, A. Deacon, H.-J. Schek, A. Sheth, and G. Weikum, “Merging Application-centric and Data-centric Approaches to Support Transaction-oriented Multi-system Workflows,” in SIGMOD Record, 22(3), September 1993.

  8. Y. Breitbart, D. Georgakopoulos, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Silberschatz, “On Rigorous Transaction Scheduling,”IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 17(9), September 1991.

  9. P.A. Bernstein, V. Hadzilacos, and N. Goodman.Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1987.

  10. P. Chrysanthis and K. Ramamritham, “A Formalism for Extended Transaction Models,”Proceedings of the 17th VLDB Conference, 1991.

  11. W. Eckerson, “Case Study: The Role of IS in Reengineering,” Open Information Systems, Patricia Seybold Group, Vol. 9, No. 2, February 1994.

  12. A. Elmagarmid, Y. Leu, W. Litwin, and M. Rusinkiewicz, “A Multidatabase Transaction Model for InterBase,”Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on VLDB, 1990.

  13. Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications, A. Elmagarmid (ed.), Morgan-Kaufmann, 1992.

  14. C. Frye, “Move to Workflow Provokes Business Process Scrutiny,” Software Magazine, April 1994.

  15. D. Georgakopoulos, et al., “An Extended Transaction Environment for Workflows in Distributed Object Computing,” in [20].

  16. D. Georgakopoulos, and M. Hornick, “A Framework for Enforceable Specification of Extended Transaction Models and Transactional Workflows,” International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, World Scientific, September 1994.

  17. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, Piotr Krychniak, and F. Manola, “Specification and Management of Extended Transactions in a Programmable Transaction Environment,” Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Data Engineering, Houston, TX, February 1994.

  18. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Rusinkiewicz, and W. Litwin, “Chronological Scheduling of Transactions with Temporal Dependencies,”VLDB Journal, January 1994.

  19. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Sheth, “Using Ticket-based Methods to Enforce the Serializability of Multidatabase Transactions,”IEEE Trans. on Data and Knowledge Engineering, February, 1994.

  20. “Special Issue on Workflow and Extended Transaction Systems,” M. Hsu (ed.),Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering (IEEE Computer Society), 16(2), June 1993.

  21. M. Hsu and C. Kleissner, “ObjectFlow: Towards a Process Management Infrastructure,” submitted for publication.

  22. I. Jacobson,Object-Oriented Software Engineering—A Use Case Driven Approach, ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Korzeniowski, “Workflow Software Automates Processes,” Software Magazine, February 1993.

  24. N. Krishnakumar and A. Sheth, “Managing Heterogeneous Multi-system Tasks to Support Enterprise-wide Operations,” in this issue.

  25. F. Leymann and D. Roller, “Business Process Management with FlowMark,”Proceedings of IEEE Compcon, March 1994.

  26. B. Liskov, “Distributed Programming in Argus,”Communications of ACM, 31(3), March 1988.

  27. S. McCready, “There is more than one kind of Work-flow Software,” Computerworld, November 2 1992.

  28. F. Manola, “MetaObject Protocol Concepts for a “RISC” Object Model,” GTE Laboratories Incorporated, TR-0244-12-93-165, Dec. 1993.

  29. R. Marshak, “Software to Support BPR—The value of Capturing Process Definitions,” Workgroup Computing Report, Patricia Seybold Group, Vol. 17, No. 7, July 1994.

  30. F. Manola, S. Heiler, D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and M. Brodie, “Distributed Object Management,”International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 1(1), March 1992.

  31. D. McCarthy and S. Sarin, “Workflow and Transactions in InConcert,” Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 1993.

  32. R. Medina-Mora, T. Winograd, and R. Flores, “Action Workflow as the Enterprise Integration Technology,” Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, June 1993.

  33. R. Medina-Mora, H. Wong, and P. Flores, “The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management,” Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, June 1992.

  34. “Building Networks: New York Telephone rethinks work to regain lost customers,” Scientific American, November 1992.

  35. “The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification,” Pub. Object Management Group and X/Open, OMG Document Number 91.12.1, Rev. 1.1, 1991.

  36. “Object Management Architecture Guide,” OMG TC Document 92.11.1, 1992.

  37. “Object Transaction Service,” OMG TC Document 94.8.4.

  38. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, W. Lorensen,Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice Hall, 1991.

  39. M. Rusinkiewicz and A. Sheth, “Specification and Execution of Transactional Workflows,” In Modern Database Systems: The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond, W. Kim, Ed., ACM Press, 1994.

  40. T. Smith, “The Future of Work flow Software,” INFORM, April 1993.

  41. T. Schael and B. Zeller, “Design Principles for Cooperative Office Support Systems in Distributed Process Management,” inSupport Functionality in the Office Environment, A. Verrijn-Stuart (ed), North Holland, 1991.

  42. T. Winograd and R. Flores,Understanding Computers and Cognition, Addison-Wesley, 1987.

  43. H. Watcher and A. Reuter, “The ConTract Model,” Chapter 7, In [13], 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GTE Laboratories Incorporated, 40 Sylvan Road, 02254, Waltham, MA

    Diimitrios Georgakopoulos & Mark Hornick

  2. LSDIS Lab, Department of C.S., University of Georgia, 415 GSRC, 30602, Athens, GA

    Amit Sheth

Authors
  1. Diimitrios Georgakopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Hornick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amit Sheth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Recomended by: Omran Bukhres and e. Kühn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M. & Sheth, A. An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib Parallel Databases 3, 119–153 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01277643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01277643

Keywords

Search

Navigation