Skip to main content
Log in

Migration intentions and behavior: Decision making in a rural Philippine province

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between intentions and behavior is basic to micro-level migration decision research. This study, set in the rural Philippine province of Ilocos Norte, provides evidence on personal and structural background factors and value-expectancy perceptions of place utility that predict migration intentions and behavior. Separate analyses are conducted for general intentions to move and for destination-specific migration intentions, the latter pertaining to both internal migration (Manila) and international migration (Hawaii). Logistic regression analyses applied to the data from a 1980–82 longitudinal survey show that the empirical models are highly efficient in explaining migration intentions but less efficient in explaining actual migration behavior in this Third World setting. Important explanatory variables for both intentions and behavior include family pressure to move or stay, family auspices at alternative destinations, money to move, prior migration experience, and the life cycle stage (marital status and age). However, the determinants of internal and international migration behavior are not the same. The data only partially support the Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) position that intentions are the dominant determinant of behavior. Personal and structural background factors are shown to exert independent direct effects on migration behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad, R., & Cariño, B. V. (1981).Micro-level determinants of migration intentions in the Ilocos: A preliminary analysis. Quezon City: Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, R. L., & Smith, J. (1977). Community satisfaction, expectations of moving and migration.Demography 14 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, B., (1981). Rural-urban migration and family ties: An analysis of family considerations in migration behavior in India.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 43 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. A., & Sanders, R. L. (1981). Toward a development paradigm of migration with particular reference to Third World settings. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.),Migration decision making: Multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries (pp. 149–185). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caces, F., Arnold, F., Fawcett, J. T., & Gardner, R. W. (1985). Shadow households and competing auspices: Migration behavior in the Philippines.Journal of Development Economics 17 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, T. (1973). Beliefs about birth control: A consistency theory analysis.Representative Research in Social Psychology 4 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., & Fawcett, J. T. (1981). Motivation for migration: An assessment and a value-expectancy research model. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.),Migration decision making: Multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries (pp. 13–58). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., & Gardner, R. W. (Eds.), (1981).Migration decision making: Multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., Abad, R. G., Arnold, F., Cariño, B. V., Fawcett, J. T., & Gardner, R. W. (1983). International and internal migration decision making: A value-expectancy based analytical framework of intentions to move from a rural Philippine province.International Migration Review 17 470–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1981).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. (1981). Mobility and uneven development in Indonesia: A critique of explanations of migration and circular migration. In G. W. Jones & H. V. Richter (Eds.),Population mobility and development: Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Development Studies Center Monograph No. 27 (pp. 51–70). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, S. F. (1981). Family structure and family strategy in migration decision making. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.),Migration decision making: Multidisciptinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries (pp. 225–251). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J. (1982).Log-linear models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model.Social Psychology Quarterly 47 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K. E. (1983). Incorporating constraints into an attitude-based model of migration intentions. Paper presented at the Population Association of America annual meeting, April 14–16, Pittsburgh, PA.

  • National Census and Statistics Office (NCS) (1980).Census of Population. Vol. 1, Manila: Bureau of Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. J., & Duncan, G. J. (1979). Residential problems, dissatisfaction, and mobility.Journal of the American Planning Association 45 154–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, R. R., & De Jong, G. F. (1983). Deciding whether to move: Mobility, wishful thinking and adjustment.Sociology and Social Research 67 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1980). The behavioral and social sciences.Science 209 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1981). Population pressure and social response on the Ilocos Coast in the Philippines. Working paper No. 2, East-West Population Institute, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility.Demography 11 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Kobrin, F., & Kingkade, W. (1982). The influence of socio-economic bonds and satisfaction of interstate migration.Social Forces 61 551–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thadani, V. N. (1982).Social relations and geographic mobility: Male and female migration in Kenya. New York: The Population Council. Center for Policy Studies, working paper No. 85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Jong, G.F., Root, B.D., Gardner, R.W. et al. Migration intentions and behavior: Decision making in a rural Philippine province. Popul Environ 8, 41–62 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263016

Keywords

Navigation