Abstract
Most research on contraceptive behavior has focused on individual women rather than on couples. A study of 101 college dating couples examined three issues that have been largely ignored in previous research: the applicability of Lindemann's (1974) stage model of contraceptive use to couples, agreement between partners in reports of contraceptive methods used, and boyfriend's characteristics as correlates of contraceptive use. Stages of contraceptive use were increasingly related to the women's prior sexual experience, and decreasingly related to the man's. Agreement on birth control methods was very high for reports of prescription methods at most recent intercourse, but low for reports of no birth control at first intercourse. Use of prescription methods at most recent intercourse was more strongly related to the women's social characteristics (father's education, religious background) than to the man's. Results suggest that focusing on women as individuals is a useful strategy for research on contraceptive use, at least for unmarried women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard, J.The future of marriage. New York: World Publishing, 1972.
Chilman, C. S.Adolescent sexuality in a changing American society. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
Cvetkovitch, G., Grote, B., Lieberman, D.J., & Miller, W. Sex role development and teenage fertility-related behavior.Adolescence 1978,8 (50), 231–236.
Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., Edmunds, M., Miller, C. T., Kelley, K., & White, L. A. Psychological and situation-specific correlates of contraceptive behavior among university women.The Journal of Sex Research 1979,15(1), 38–55.
Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.Journal of Social Issues 1976,32(1), 147–168.
Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Willard, S. G. The volunteer couple: Sex differences, couple commitment, and participation in research on interpersonal relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly 1979,42(4), 415–420.
Hill, C. T., Peplau, L. A., & Rubin, Z. Differing perceptions in dating couples: Sex roles versus alternative explanations.Psychology of Women Quarterly 1981,5(3), 418–434.
Hollerbach, P. E. Power in families, communication, and fertility decision-making.Population and Environment 1980,3(2), 146–173.
Kantner, J., & Zelnik, M. Contraception and pregnancy: Experience of young unmarried women in the U.S.Family Planning Perspectives 1973,4(4), 21–35.
Lindemann, C.Birth control and unmarried young women. New York: Springer, 1974.
McCormick, N., Izzo, A., & Folcik, J. Adolescents' values, sexuality, and contraception in a rural New York county.Adolescence, in press.
Peplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. Sexual intimacy in dating couples.Journal of Social Issues 1977,33(2), 86–109.
Zelnik, M., & Kantner, J. F. Sexual and contraceptive experience of young unmarried women in the United States, 1976 and 1971.Family Planning Perspectives 1977,9(2), 55–71.
Zabin, L. S., Kantner, J. F., & Zelnik, M. The risk of adolescent pregnancy in the first months of intercourse.Family Planning Perspectives 1979,11(4), 215–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank George Cvetkovich for encouraging the research, and Naomi McCormick and anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. The collection of data was supported by NSF grant GS-27422 to Z. Rubin. Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to C. T. Hill, Dept. of Psychology, Whittier College, Whittier, CA 90608.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hill, C.T., Peplau, L.A. & Rubin, Z. Contraceptive use by college dating couples: A comparison of men's and women's reports. Popul Environ 6, 60–69 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255865
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255865