Skip to main content
Log in

Speculation and Tobin taxes: Why sand in the wheels can increase economic efficiency

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current paper develops the microeconomic case for a Tobin tax. It combines the noise-trader literature with the Tobin-tax-policy literature. Noise traders cause economic losses by inappropriately cashing out their investments. A Tobin tax can reduce such activity, thereby conferring a benefit on fundamentals investors. The paper identifies the conditions under which these gains would be largest and provides guidelines as to whether a tax is warranted. There is a trade-off because Tobin taxes discourage fundamentals investors from trading, and there are occasions when they would rationally choose to trade but do not because of the tax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, D., Pollin, R., and Schauberg, M. (1995): “The Case for a Securities Transactions Tax: Taxing the Big Casino.” Working paper, Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., and Waldman, R. J. (1990): “Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets.”Journal of Political Economy 98: 703–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, D., and Sau, R. (1996): “On the Revenue Potential and Phasing In of the Tobin Tax.” InThe Tobin Tax: Coping with Financial Volatility, edited by M. Haq, I. Kaul, and I. Grundberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953a): “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” InEssays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1953b): “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates.” InEssays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936):The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley, T. I. (1997): “Managerial Turnover and the Theory of Short-Termism.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32: 547–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999): “International Finance and Global Deflation: There Is an Alternative.” InGlobal Instability and World Economic Governance, edited by J. Grieve-Smith and J. Michie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (1989): “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms, in a Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 655–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1978): “A Proposal for International Monetary Reform.”Eastern Economic Journal 4: 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A. (1990): “Real vs. Financial Investment: Can Tobin Taxes Eliminate the Irreversibility Distortion?”Journal of Development Economics 32: 419–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palley, T.I. Speculation and Tobin taxes: Why sand in the wheels can increase economic efficiency. Zeitschr. f. National#x00F6;konomie 69, 113–126 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01232416

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01232416

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation