Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate taxation and the efficiency gains of the 1986 Tax Reform Act

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The 1986 Tax Reform Act (TRA) had little effect on the overall U. S. effective capital income tax rate. However, TRA significantly reduced differences in effective taxation of corporate and noncorporate capital for a number of U. S. industries. The Mutual Production Model developed in Gravelle and Kotlikoff (1989) can be used to study the efficiency gains from the reduction in corporate tax wedges within industries. Unlike the Harberger Model, the Mutual Production Model permits both corporate and noncorporate firms to produce the same goods and, therefore, to coexist within a given industry.

This paper develops an 11-industry-55-year dynamic life cycle version of the Mutual Production Model. We use this model to study the steady-state efficiency gains associated with the new law. While we do not simulate the economy's transition path, our steady-state welfare changes are those that arise from compensating transitional generations for the first-order redistribution of income associated with the Tax Reform.

We find that the 1986 Tax Reform law reduces excess burden by 85 percent of our model's economy's present value of consumption. This efficiency gain reflects the Tax Reform's reduction in corporate-noncorporate tax wedges, particularly in those industries with significant noncorporate production. Measured as a flow the 1988 estimated efficiency gain from the Tax Reform Act is $31 billion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, A. J.: The deadweight loss from ‘nonneutral’ capital income taxation. J. Publ. Econ.40, 1–36 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, J.: Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. J.: Capital gains and income taxation. In: Harberger, A. C., Bailey, M. J. (eds.) The taxation of income from capital. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J.: A general equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamley, C.: Entrepreneurial abilities and liabilities in a model of self selection. Bell J. Econ.14, 70–80 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrill, L. P., Hartman, D. G.: On the incidence and excess burden of the corporation income tax. Publ. Finance37, 48–58 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R.: Capital gains and income: real changes in the value of capital in the United States, 1946–77 In: Usher, D. (ed.) The measurement of capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Gillette, R., Mackie, J.: Investment incentives under the Tax Reform Act of 1986. In: Compendium of tax research 1987, Office of Tax Analysis, Washington, D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Henderson, Y. K.: A disaggregate general equilibrium model of the tax distortions among assets, sectors, and industries. Int. Econ. Rev.30, 391–413 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Henderson, Y. K., Mackie, J.: Investment allocation and growth under the Tax Reform Act of 1986. In: Compendium of tax research 1987. Office of T ax Analysis, Washington, D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J.: General equilibrium analysis of U. S. tax policy. In: Compendium of tax research 1978. Office of Tax Analysis, Washington, D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J.: Replacing the U. S. income tax with a progressive consumption Tax. J. Pub. Econ.20, 3–23 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Effects of the 1981 depreciation revisions on the taxation of income from business capital. Natl. Tax. J.35, 1–20 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Capital income taxation and efficiency in the allocation of investment. Natl. Tax J.36, 297–306 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Tax policy and rental housing: an economic analysis. Congressional Research Service Report No. 87-536. Washington, D. C.: Library of Congress, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Comment on minimum taxes and comprehensive tax reform. In: Aaron, H. J., Galper, H., and Pechman, J. A. (eds.) Uneasy compromise: problems of a hybrid income-consumption tax. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Differential taxation of capital income: another look at the Tax Reform Act. Natl. Tax J.62, 441–63 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G.: Income, consumption and wage taxation in a life cycle model: separating efficiency from redistribution. Amer. Econ. Rev.81, 985–995 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G., Kotlikoff, L. J.: The incidence and efficiency costs of corporate taxation when corporate and noncorporate firms produce the same good. J. Polit. Econ.97, 749–780 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle, J. G., Kotlikoff, J.: Corporate tax incidence and inefficiency when corporate and noncorporate goods are close substitutes. Econ. Inqu.31, 501–516 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E.: Intertemporal substitution in consumption. J. Polit. Econ.96, 339–357 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., Jorgenson, D. W.: Tax policy and investment behavior. Amer. Econ. Rev.58, 391–414 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.: The incidence of the corporation income tax. J. Polit. Econ.70, 107–117 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.: Efficiency effects of taxes on income from capital. In: Krzyzniak, M. (ed.) Effects of the corporation income tax. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. C.: Taxation resource allocation, and welfare. In: The role of direct and indirect taxes in the federal reserve system. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. C., Bruce, N.: The incidence and efficiency effects of taxes on income from capital. J. Pol. Econ.84, 1285–1292 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, P., Hu, S. C.: Investment in producer's durable equipment. In: Aaron, H. J., Pechman, J. A. (eds.) How taxes affect economic behavior. The Brookings Institution, 1981

  • Hulten, C. R., Wykoff, F. C.: The measurement of economic depreciation. In: Hulten, C. R. (ed.) Depreciation, inflation and taxation of income from capital. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Jr.: On the size distribution of business firms. Bell. J. Econ.9, 508–523 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S., Petska, T.: Partnerships, passive losses, and tax reform. Stat. Income Bull.9, 31–39 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L. G.: Taxation of income from capital by industry group. In: Harberger, A. C., Bailey, M. J., (eds.) The taxation of income from capital. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J. B.: The incidence and efficiency effects of taxes on income from capital. J. Polit. Econ.84, 1261–1283 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J. B., Whalley, J.: A general equilibrium calculation of the effects of differential taxation of income from capital in the U. S. J. Publ. Econ.1, 281–322 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Commerce: Input-output accounts of the U. S. economy, 1981. Surv. Curr. Business 42–57 (1987)

  • U. S. Department of Treasury: Internal revenue service: Statistics of income. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, various years

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Boston University, or The National Bureau of Economic Research. We are particularly grateful to Alan Auerbach, Oldrich Kyn, and an anonymous referee for very extensive and critical comments. We also thank Don Fullerton, Yolanda Henderson, Tom Woodward, and a referee for their very helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gravelle, J.G., Kotlikoff, L.J. Corporate taxation and the efficiency gains of the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Econ Theory 6, 51–81 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213941

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213941

Keywords

Navigation