Summary
This paper develops a duality theory for preference orders, and highlights important differences with respect to the cardinal utility approach. Our main result is a symmetric duality theorem, under the minimal hypotheses, between direct and indirect preferences. In contrast to the cardinal theory, we also find that these conditions do not completely characterize the class of indirect preference orders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crouzeix, J. P.: Duality between direct and indirect utility functions: differentiability properties. J. Math. Econ.12, 149–165 (1983)
Diewert, W. E.: Duality approaches to microeconomic theory. In: Arrow, K. J., Intriligator, M. D. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Economics, vol. 2, pp. 535–599. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1982
Fenchel, W.: A remark on convex sets and polarity. Comm. Sem. Math. Univ. Lund (Medd. Lunds Univ. Math. Sem.) Tome Supplém., 82–89 (1952)
Martinez-Legaz, J.-E.: Quasiconvex duality theory by generalized conjugation methods. Optimization19, 603–652 (1988)
Martinez-Legaz, J.-E.: Duality between direct and indirect utility functions under minimal hypotheses. J. Math. Econ.20, 199–209 (1991)
Szász, G.: Introduction to lattice theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1963)
Yannelis, N. C., Prabhakar, N. D.: Existence of maximal elements and equilibria in linear topological spaces. J. Math. Econ.12, 233–245 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are grateful to an editor for helpful remarks. This work was partially supported by DGICYT (Spain), Project PS89-OO58.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martinez-Legaz, J.E., Santos, M.S. Duality between direct and indirect preferences. Econ Theory 3, 335–351 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212921
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212921