Skip to main content
Log in

Tropical pollinators in the canopy and understory: Field data and theory for stratum “preferences”

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Claims have been made for a canopy preference by large bees pollinating tropical flowers—without data or tests that support or refute this opinion. The working hypothesis for bee foraging behavior in three dimensions is that forager experience can produce stratum fidelity, just as rewarding foraging produces floral fidelity. Wideranging search behavior should allow bees to track spatiotemporal distribution of resources. A systematic study of 20 bee species and 10 genera: Apis, Trigona, Eulaema, Centris, Euglossa, Scaptotrigona, Partamona, Megalopta, Rhinetula,and Oxytrigonawas made in two forests in Panama. Two traps were operated simultaneously at canopy height and in the understory to test whether there were consistent stratum associations. Studies were continuous for 1 and 8 years. The only high-canopy foragers were two nocturnal bees, all the rest flew at both heights with similar probability or consistently came to lower traps. Large euglossines showed a tendency to forage high, which was directly related to their capacity for heat loss during flight, compared to smaller euglossines. They are also more conspicuous in warning coloration, another expected correlate of foraging more often in the open. Although large variance in stratum association predominates, some medium-sized diurnal forest bees avoid the exposed upper canopy, while some nocturnal bees tend to forage there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, J. D. (1983). Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 20: 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S. (1990). Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests.Annu. Rev. Syst. Ecol. 21: 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., Bullock, S. H., Perry, D. R., Coville, R. E., and Grayum, M. H. (1985). Reproductive biology of lowland rain forest trees II. Pollination systems.Am. J. Bot. 72: 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P., Moure, J. S., and Peralta, F. J. A. (1992). More about euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments.Biotropica 23: 586–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, L. A. O., da Silveira, F. A., de Oliveira, M. L., Abrantes, C. V. M., Morato, E. F., and de Melo, G. A. R. (1989). UtilizaÇÃo de armadilhas para a captura de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apoidea).Revista Brasil. Zool. 6: 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, T. M., May, M. L., and Morgan, K. R. (1985). Flight energetics of euglossine bees in relation to morphology and wing stroke frequency.J. Exp. Biol. 116: 271–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M. A. (1984). Temperature regulation and energetics of the solitary beeCentris pallida during foraging and intermale mate competition.Physiol. Zool. 57: 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1876).Cross and Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom, J. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R. L. (1982). Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 13: 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie, G. W., Haber, W. A., Opler, P. A., and Bawa, K. S. (1983). Characteristics and organization of the large bee pollination system inthe Costa Rican dry forest. In Jones, C. E., and Little, R. J., (eds.),Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 411–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie, G. B., Vinson, S. B., Newstrom, L. E., Barthell, J. F., Haber, W. A., and Frankie, J. K. (1990). Plant phenology, pollination ecology, pollinator behavior and conservation of pollinators in neotropical dry forest. In Bawa, K. S., and Hadley, M. (eds.),Reproductive Ecology of Tropical Forest Plants, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, Man and the Biosphere Series, Vol. 7, Parthenon, Carnforth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1976). Foraging specializations of individual bumble bees.Ecological Monographs 46: 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B., and Buchmann, S. L. (1986). Thermoregulatory physiology of the carpenter bee,Xylocopa varipuncta.J. Comp. Physiol. B 156: 557–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jander, R. (1975). Ecological aspects of animal orientation.Annu. Rev. Syst. Ecol. 6: 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H. (1981). Bee arrival at two Costa Rican femaleCatasetum orchid inflorescences, and a hypothesis on euglossine population structure.Oikos 36: 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1972). A comparative study of the structure of avian communities in selected Panamanian and Illinois habitats.Ecol. Monogr. 41: 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., Roubik, D. W., and Inoue, T. (1992). Foraging behavior and concentration preference of male euglossine bees (Apidae: Hymenoptera).Tropics 1: 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. (1958). Population ecology of some warblers of northwestern coniferous forests.Ecology 39: 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. L., and Casey, T. M. (1983). Thermoregulation and heat exchange in euglossine bees.Physiol. Zool. 56: 541–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D. (1990). Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera).Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 54: 75–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, R. K., Sutton, S. C., and Fletcher, C. R. (1992). Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of flying Diptera.J. Zool. 228: 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. A., and Starrett, A. (1980). The pollination ecology and blooming strategy of a neotropical emergent tree,Dipteryx panamensis.Biotropica 12: 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1979). Africanized honey bees, stingless bees, and the structure of tropical plant-pollinator communities. In Caron, D. (ed.),Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Pollination, Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication 1.

  • Roubik, D. W. (1989).Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1990). Niche preemption in tropical bee communities: A comparison of neotropical and malesian faunas. In Sakagami, S. F., Ohgushi, R., and Roubik, D. W. (eds.),Natural History of Social Wasps and Bees in Equatorial Sumatra, Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1992). Loose niches in tropical communities: Why are there so few bees and so many trees? In Hunter, M. D., Ohgushi, T., and Price, P. W. (eds.),Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal-Plant Interactions, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W., and Ackerman, J. D. (1987). Long-term ecology of euglossine orchid-bees (Apidae: Euglossini) in Panama.Oecologia 73: 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W., and Moreno, J. E. (1991).Pollen and Spores of Barro Colorado Island, Monographs in Systematic Botany, No. 36, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W., and Wolda, H. (1993). Pollinator population dynamics on a tropical forest island: 15 years, three El Niño events, and colonization by African honeybees (submitted for publication).

  • Roubik, D. W., Ackerman, J. D., Copenhaver, C., and Smith, B. H. (1982). Stratum, tree and flower selection by tropical bees: Implications for the reproductive biology of outcrossingCochlospermum vitifolium in Panamá.Ecology 63: 712–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. N., Amos, J. N., Stone, T. F., Knight, R. L., Gay, H., and Parrott, F. (1988). Thermal effects on activity patterns and behavioral switching in a concourse of foragers onStachytarpheta mutabilis (Verbenaceae) in Papua New Guinea.Oecologia 77: 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. L., and Hudson, P. J. (1980). The vertical distribution of small flying insects in the lowland rain forest of Zaire.Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, K. D. (1979). Divergence of inflorescence height: An evolutionary response to pollinator fidelity.Oecologia 40: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W. M., Young, A. M., and Williams, N. H. (1989). Function of glandular secretions in fragrance collection by male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini).J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1285–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer, P. G. (1991). Constraints on foraging by solitary bees. InBehavior and Physiology of Bees, Goodman, L. J., and Fisher, R. C. (eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H., and Roubik, D. W. (1986). Nocturnal bee abundance and seasonal bee activity in a Panamanian forest.Ecology 67: 426–433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roubik, D.W. Tropical pollinators in the canopy and understory: Field data and theory for stratum “preferences”. J Insect Behav 6, 659–673 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201668

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201668

Key words

Navigation