Skip to main content
Log in

Cytoevolutionary patterns inRutaceae

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosome numbers for 9 tribes and 73 genera ofRutaceae are examined for the probable chromosome base numbers in these taxa. There is abundant dysploidy and infrageneric polyploidy in the largeRutoideae/Toddalioideae complex. We found that x = 18 was typical for the tribesZanthoxyleae andToddalieae; probably ancestral in theBoronieae and perhaps in theRuteae, Diosmieae, andCusparieae; and characteristic of subfamilyFlindersioideae. Considering the basic position of elements ofZanthoxyleae andToddalieae in the family it appears that diploid x = 18 is ancestral in theRutaceae. The morphologically advancedCitroideae are invariant for x = 9 and may be a product of dysploid reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. J., 1975: Taxonomy ofCorrea glabra Lindl. andC. schlechtendalii Behr (Rutaceae). — Unpubl. B. Sc. Hons. thesis, La Trobe University, Vic. Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. A., 1975: The current status of the subfamilyCitroideae. — Austral. Pl.8: 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981:Rutaceae — InJacobs, S. W. L., Pickard, J., (Eds): Plants of New South Wales. A census of the cycads, conifers, and angiosperms, pp. 190–195. — Sydney: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1983:Rutaceae. — InMorley B. D., Toelken, H. R., (Eds): Flowering plants in Australia, pp. 194–198. — Adelaide: Rigby.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: Floral syndromes as generic determinants. — Austral. Syst. Bot. Soc. Newsletter53: 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991:Zieria. — InHarden, G. J., (Ed.): Flora of New South Wales 2, pp. 236–246. — Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980:Neobyrnesia (Rutaceae): a new genus endemic to Northern Australia. — Telopea1: 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguar, S., 1967: Chromosome numbers in some vascular plants of East Pakistan. — Rev. Biol.6: 440–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, I., 1954: Morphological and cytological studies onCitrus grandis Osbeck. — Phytomorphology4: 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1957: A note on the cytology and pollen ofAegle marmelos Corr. — Phyton (Buenos Aires)8: 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, B. A., 1981: The Australian flora: its origin and evolution. — InGeorge, A., (Ed.): Flora of Australia 1, Introduction, pp. 25–75. — Canberra: Austral. Government Publ. Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1971: The cytogeography of the loranthaceous mistletoes. — Taxon20: 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardello, L. M., 1983: Cromosomas gameticos deFagaro coco (Hook & Arn)Engl. (Rutaceae). — Kurtziana16: 165–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, E., 1964: Anteil der Polyploiden in der Flora des Bismarcksgebuiges von Ostneuguinea. — Z. Bot.52: 118–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G. D., 1985: Additional chromosome numbers of Hawaiian flowering plants. — Pac. Sci.39: 302–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, F., Gonzalez-Medrano, F., 1981: Nueva especie deCasimiroa (Rutaceae) de la zona arida oxyqueno-poblana. — Bol. Soc. Bot. Mexico41: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen-Bockoff, R., Armstrong, J. A., Ohligschläger, M., 1991: The inflorescences of the Australian generaDiploplaena R. Br. andChorilaena Endl. (Rutaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.39: 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. J., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, M. F., Gottlieb, O. R., Ehrendorfer, F., 1988: Chemosystematics of theRutaceae: suggestions for a more natural taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the family. — Pl. Syst. Evol.161: 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., Wylie, A. P., 1955: Chromosome atlas of flowering plants. — London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. R., 1955: Chromosome numbers in theRutaceae. — Nature175: 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1976: Evolutionary significance of chromosomal differentiation patterns in gymnosperms and primitive angiosperms. — InBeck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and early evolution of angiosperms, pp. 220–240. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: Speciation patterns in woody angiosperms of tropical origin. — InBarigozzi, C., (Ed.): Mechanisms of speciation, pp. 479–509. — New York: Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1931:Rutaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Natürliche Pflanzenfamilien19 a: 187–359. 2nd edn. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov, A., 1969: Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. — Leningrad: Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, H. B., 1925a: Tetraploidy inCitrus. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA11: 535–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1925b: The chromosomes ofCitrus. — J. Washington Acad. Sci.15: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1948: Seed reproduction: development of gametes and embryos. — InWebber, H. J., Batchelor, L. D., (Eds): The citrus industry 1, pp. 767–815. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukomoto, K., 1960: Spontaneous polyploid plants ofPoncirus trifoliata. — La Kromosomo42–43: 1444–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajapathy, R., 1962: Cytological observations in some dicotyledons. — Sci. Cult.28: 375–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafferi, S. M., 1987: Chromosome counts of some angiosperms from Iran II. — Iran. J. Bot.3: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, B. S., Bir, S. S., Singhal, V. K., 1979: IOPB chromosome number reports LXV. — Taxon28: 630.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, , 1981: IOPB chromosome number reports LXXI. — Taxon30: 513–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1984: IOPB chromosome number reports LXXXIV. — Taxon33: 538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1981: Cytology and the phylogeny ofLeguminosae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics, pp. 427–463. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: Notes on chromosome cytology ofRutaceae-Diosmeae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.74: 443–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1982: Periodicities in the chromosome numbers of the angiosperms. — Bot. Gaz.143: 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., Dos, S., 1984: New chromosome numbers inRutaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.146: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Citogenetica de angiospermas coletadas em Pernambuco. I. — Rev. Brasil. Genet.9: 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. B., Beuzenberg, E. J., 1960: Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora. IV. Miscellaneous families. — New Zealand J. Sci.3: 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanelt, P., 1973: IOPB chromosome number reports XLII. — Taxon22: 648–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, T. G., 1966: A revision of the Malesian species ofZanthoxylum (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.47: 171–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1969: A revision of the genusFlindersia (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.50: 481–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1970: Additional notes on the Malesian species ofZanthoxylum (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.51: 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1974: A revision of the genusAcronychia (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.55: 469–523, 525–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1977: A revision of the genusAcradenia (Rutaceae). — J. Arnold Arbor.58: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: A revision of the genusTetradium (Rutaceae). — Garden's Bull. (Singapore)34: 91–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: A revision of the genusMedicosma (Rutaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.33: 27–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: A new species and new combinations inMelicope (Rutaceae) in New South Wales. — Telopea4: 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Reduction ofPelea with new combinations inMelicope (Rutaceae). — Taxon38: 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-C., 1967: Preliminary chromosome studies on the vascular plants of Taiwan (I). — Taiwania13: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1968: Preliminary chromosome studies on the vasular plants of Taiwan (II). — Taiwania14: 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S. H., 1979: Chromosome numbers and genetic systems in the trigger plants of Western Australia (Stylidium: Stylidiaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.27: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Cytoevolutionary patterns, genetic systems and the phytogeography of Australia. — InKeast, A., (Ed.): Ecological biogeography of Australia, pp. 763–782. — The Hague: W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Inbreeding, self-fertilization, lethal genes and genomic coalescence. — Heredity68: 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. A. T., Taylor, N. P., 1989: Chromosome counts in the genusSkimmia (Rutaceae). — Kew Bull.44: 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keighery, G. J., 1978: Chromosome numbers in Western Australian Plants, I. — J. Roy. Soc. Western Australia60: 105–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: Chromosome numbers in Western Australian Plants, II. — J. Roy. Soc. Western Australia65: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, C. A., 1943: Chromosome numbers in the subfamilyCitroideae with special reference to the genusCitrus. — Bot. Gaz.104: 602–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosowa, S., 1966: Cytological studies on some Eastern Himalayan plants. — InHiroshi Hara (Ed.): The Flora of Eastern Himalaya, pp. 658–670. — Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malla, S. B., Bhattarai, S., Gorkhali, M., Saiju, H., Kayastha, M., 1981: IOPB chromosome number reports LXX. — Taxon30: 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangenot, S., Mangenot, G., 1957: Nombres chromosomiques noveaux chez diverses Dicotyledones et Monocotyledones d'Afrique occidentale. — Bull. Jard. Bot. (Bruxelles)27: 639–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1958: Deuxieme liste de nombres chromosomiques nouveaux chez diverses Dicotyledones et Monocotyledones d'Afrique occidentale. — Bull. Jard. Bot. (Bruxelles)28: 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1962: Enquete sur les nombres chromosomiques dans une collection d'especes tropicales. — Rev. Cyt. Biol. Veg.254: 411–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, P. N., Khosla, P. K., 1969: IOPB chromosome number reports XX. — Taxon18: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1969: IOPB chromosome number reports XXII. — Taxon18: 439–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, W., 1986: Remarks on karyological differentiation patterns in tropical woody plants. — Pl. Syst. Evol.152: 49–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani, S. P., Raghuvanshi, S. S., 1958: Cytogenetical studies in the genusCitrus. — Nature181: 1406–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1963: Cytological studies inCitrus. I. — Genetica33: 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, M., 1934b: Cytological studies in the genusCitrus II. The chromosome number, pollen sterility, and the formation of abnormal tetrads. — Studia Citrologica6: 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, J., Leitao, M. T., 1989: Numeros chromosomicos para alguns taxa da Africa tropical II. — Bol. Soc. Brot. ser. 2,62: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancho, J. V., 1971: IOPB chromosome number reports XXXIV. — Taxon20: 794–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillans, N. S., 1950: A revision ofAgathosma. — J. S. African Bot.16: 55–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puff, C., Weber, A., 1976: Contribution to the morphology, anatomy, and karyology ofRhabdodendron, and a reconsideration of the systematic position of theRhabdodendraceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.125: 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, R. S., 1957: Chromosome numbers in Indian medicinal plants. — Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., sect. B.45: 294–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1958: Chromosome numbers in Indian medicinal plants. II. — Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., sect. B.47: 352–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi, S. S., 1962a: Cytogenetical studies in genusCitrus. III.Citrus assamensis. — Caryologia15: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1962b: Cytogenetical studies in genusCitrus IV. Evolution in genusCitrus. — Cytologia27: 172–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattenbury, J. A., 1957: Chromosome numbers in New Zealand angiosperms. — Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand84: 936–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 724–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1965: Chromosome numbers of spermatophytes, mostly Californian. — Aliso6: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, H. P., Hoff, V. J., 1961: Chromosome studies in some South African Dicotyledons. — Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.3: 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, B. L., 1979: Chromosome number variation in theMyrtaceae and its taxonomic implications. — Austral. J. Bot.27: 547–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, P. S., Mann, S. K., 1988: SOCGI plant chromosome number reports. VII. — J. Genet. Cytol.23: 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanjappa, M., 1979: IOPB chromosome number reports LXIII. — Taxon28: 274–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santamour, F. S., 1966: Cytological notes II.Phellodendron. — Morris Arbor Bull.17: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, A. K., Datta, R., Raychodhury, M., Das, S., 1975: IOPB chromosome number reports L. — Taxon24: 678.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: IOPB chromosome number reports LXXVI. — Taxon31: 576–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scora, R. W., Kumamoto, J., 1983: Chemotaxonomy of the genusCitrus. — InWaterman, P. G., Grundon, M. F., (Eds): Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales, pp. 343–351. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. K., Bal, A. K., 1957: Chromosome studies inCitrus I. — Agron. Lusitana19: 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N. W., 1954: Chromosome behaviour in some tropical plants. — Heredity8: 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, V. K., Gill, B. S., Bir, S. S., 1980: IOPB Chromosome number reports LXVII. — Taxon29: 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,, 1984: SOCGI plant chromosome number reports II. — J. Cytol. Genet.19: 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-White, S., 1954: Chromosome numbers in theBoronieae (Rutaceae) and their bearing on the evolutionary development of the tribe in the Australian flora. — Austral. J. Bot.2: 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1959: Cytological evolution in the Australian flora. — Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.24: 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1970: The cytology ofBrachycome. I. The subgenusEubrachycome: a general survey. — Austral. J. Bot.18: 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobti, S. N., Verma, V., Rao, B. L., Pushpangadan, P., 1979: IOPB chromosome number reports LXV. — Taxon28: 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specht, R. L., 1981: Major vegetation formations in Australia. — InKeast, A., (Ed.): Ecological biogeography of Australia 1, pp. 165–297. — The Hague: W. Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, H. M., 1978: Cytoevolution in the genusCalotis R. Br. (Compositae: Astereae). — Austral. J. Bot.26: 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: New chromosome numbers forRutaceae. — Austral. Syst. Bot.5: 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1993: Cytological notes inRutaceae. 1:Boronia tenius. — Nuytsia9: 131–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. C., Lowry, J. B., Scora, R. W., Jong, K., 1973:Citrus halimii: a new species from Malaya and peninsular Thailand. — Biotropica5: 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strid, A. K., 1972: Revision of the genusAdenandra (Rutaceae). — Opera Bot.32: 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, R. F., 1966: Estudio anatomico dePitavia punctata (Rutaceae). — Gayana Bot.15: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschishow, N. T. de, 1956: Numero de cromosomas de algunas plantas chilenas. — Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion (Chile)31: 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil, I. K., 1962: Formation of male gametes in the pollen tubes of some crop plants. — In: Plant embryology, a symposium, pp. 254–260. — New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D. E., 1984: Chromosome counts from New Mexico and Mexico. — Phytologia56: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P. G., 1983: Phylogenetic implications of the distribution of secondary metabolites within theRutales. — InWaterman, P. G., Grundon, M. F., (Eds): Chemistry and chemical taxonomy of theRutales, pp. 377–400. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, P. H., Carolin, R. C., Armstrong, J. A., 1984: A cladistic analysis ofBoronia Sm. andBoronella Baill. (Rutaceae). — Austral. J. Bot.32: 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. G., 1961: A taxonomic revision of the genusCorrea (Rutaceae). — Trans. Roy. Soc. Southern Australia85: 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1970: Taxonomic revision of the generaCrowea, Eriostemon, andPhebalium (Rutaceae). — Nuytsia1: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1971: Taxonomic notes on the familyRutaceae, principally of Western Australia. — Nuytsia1: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: The namesAsterolasia F. Muell. andUrocarpus Harvey (Rutaceae). — Nuytsia6: 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, S. H., 1940:Citrus, cytological investigation. — Texan Agric. Expt. Sta. Ann. Rept.53: 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakharyeva, O. I., Astanova, S. B., 1968: Chromosome numbers of some native flowering plant species of Central Asia. — Dokl. Akad. Nauk. Tadzhiksk. SSR11: 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stace, H.M., Armstrong, J.A. & James, S.H. Cytoevolutionary patterns inRutaceae . Pl Syst Evol 187, 1–28 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994089

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994089

Key words

Navigation