Skip to main content
Log in

A causal model of faculty turnover intentions

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A causal model is proposed and estimated to assess the relative influence of individual attributes, institutional characteristics, contextual-work environment variables, and multiple measures of job satisfaction on the intentions of faculty to leave their current institutions. Special attention is given to similarities and differences among variables in the model for tenured and untenured faculty. Regardless of tenure status, younger faculty, those at institutions that have experienced decline and that have more autocratic forms of governance, and those that have lower levels of organizational and career satisfaction are more likely to leave their institutions. Being a male, spending more time on research, and having a stronger record of scholarly productivity are positive influences on the intentions of tenured faculty to leave their institution, while salary satisfaction is an influential variable only for nontenured faculty. The research and policy implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G., and Riley, G. L. (1978).Policy Making and Effective Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., and Blackburn, R. T. (1981). The academic career as a developmental process.Journal of Higher Education 52: 598–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E. (1973).Teaching Faculty in Academe: 1972–73. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1982). Student attrition, intentions, and confidence.Research in Higher Education 17: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1964).Academic Women. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, D. E. (1978). Correlates of faculty publications.Sociology of Education 51: 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., and Havighurst, R. J. (1979). Career patterns of U.S. male academic social scientists.Higher Education 8: 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986).American Professors. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (1986). The normative structure of science. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2 (pp. 309–357). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G. (1967).The Mobile Professors. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, D. L. (1988).A New Academic Marketplace. Westport, CN: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. (1983). Strategic responses to conditions of decline.Journal of Higher Education 54: 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. (1986). A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors.Management Science 32: 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., and Ulrich, D. O. (1986). Transformational leadership in colleges and universities. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2 (pp. 1–42). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. and Zammuto, R. F. (1986). Matching managerial strategies to conditions of decline.Human Resource Management 22: 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., Kim, M. U., Whetten, D. A., and Chaffee, E. (1987). The aftermath of decline.Review of Higher Education 10: 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., Whetten, D. A., and Kim, M. U. (1987). Organizational dysfunctions of decline.Academy of Management Journal 30: 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T., and McGee, R. J. (1958).The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cares, R. C., and Blackburn, R. T. (1978). Faculty self-actualization: Factors affecting success.Research in Higher Education 9: 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, A. M. (1976).Ph.D.s and the Academic Labor Market. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1985). Maintaining faculty vitality through faculty development. In S. M. Clark and D. R. Lewis (eds.),Faculty Vitality and Institutional Productivity (pp. 141–156). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E. (1984). Successful strategic management in small private colleges.Journal of Higher Education 55: 212–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1987).The Academic Life. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., and Lewis, D. R. (eds.) (1985).Faculty Vitality and Institutional Productivity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. L., and Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research.Academy of Management Review 11: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., and Bean, J. P. (1981). Research output, socialization, and the Biglan model.Research in Higher Education 15: 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, R. V. (1965). Market power as an intervening mechanism in Phillips curve analysis.Economica 32: 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J. (1984).The American Academic Profession. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 1 (pp. 255–282). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, B. (1983). Male and female industrial workers: Job satisfaction, work role centrality and work place preference.Work and Occupations 10: 413–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. (1958).Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. (1971).Academic Janus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. W., and Ford, R. C. (1987). Faculty research productivity and intention to change position.Review of Higher Education 11: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., and Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process.Psychological Bulletin 86: 493–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., and Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology 63: 408–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C. J. (1989). Uncertainty is rampant as colleges begin to brace for faculty shortage expected to begin in 1990s.Chronicle of Higher Education 35: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P. M., and Morrow, P. C. (1980). A multidisciplinary model of voluntary employee turnover.Journal of Vocational Behavior 17: 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P. M., and Tuttle, M. L. (1979). Employee turnover: An empirical and methodological assessment.Journal of Vocational Behavior 14: 43–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, B. (1981). Dropouts from higher education: Path analysis of a national sample.American Educational Research Journal 18: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opinion Research Corporation (1984).Technical Manual: 1984 Carnegie Foundation National Surveys of Higher Education. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university.Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W. and Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational work and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism.Psychological Bulletin 80: 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (ed.),Sociological Methodology, 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1988). American higher education: Past, present, and future.Educational Researcher 17: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. (1984).Chairing the Academic Department: Leadership Among Peers. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1981). Organizational responses to scarcity.Educational Administration Quarterly 17: 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle, L. M. (1985). Applications of causal models in higher education. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 1 (pp. 381–413). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle, L. M., and Ethington, C. A. (1985). GEMINI: Program for analysis of structural equations with standard errors of indirect effects.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 17: 581–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R. F. (1986). Managing decline in higher education. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 2 (pp. 43–84). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Source of data: Carnegie Surveys of Undergraduates and Faculty. Copyright 1985, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1985.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smart, J.C. A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Res High Educ 31, 405–424 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992710

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992710

Keywords

Navigation