Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The morphology and relationships ofMedusagyne (Medusagynaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparative vegetative and reproductive morphology and anatomy of the endangered, monotypic, dicotyledonous genusMedusagyne was studied, and detailed descriptions of leaf, axis, nodal, wood, floral, pollen, fruit, and seed structure are presented. Overall, the genus has many specialized features, including the possession of extreme, habitat-related specializations. Flowers are either bisexual or staminate, and are interpreted as retaining some primitive aspects, such as many free parts spirally arranged on an elongate floral axis. One of the most salient structural features of the plant is the massive development of ensheathing fibrous elements around the vascular system of both vegetative and reproductive tissues. Diffuse foliar sclereids are absent. Particular attention is paid to the unusual multicarpellate, synovarial gynoecium and comparisons are made with theCaryocaraceae. The totality of morphological and anatomical evidence confirms the view thatMedusagyne is a very distinct and evolutionarily isolated genus, best treated as forming the monotypic familyMedusagynaceae. Observations are presented, including the occurrence of stamen fascicle traces, that link the family to the dillenialean and thealean assemblage. Like other isolated thealean taxa,Medusagyne shows affinities to several different families, without having especially close relationships with any particular extant taxon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnott, H. T., 1959: Leaf clearings. — Turtox News37: 192–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baas, P., 1975: Vegetative anatomy and the affinities ofAquifoliaceae, Sphenostemon, Phelline, andOncotheca. — Blumea22: 311–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. B., 1877: Flora of Mauritius and the Seychelles: a description of the flowering plants and ferns of those islands. — London: L. Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baretta-Kuipers, T., 1976: Comparative wood anatomy ofBonnetiaceae, Theaceae, andGuttiferae. — Leiden Bot. Ser.3: 76–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvisage, L., 1920: Contribution a l'étude anatomique de la famille des Ternstroemiacées. — Tours: Doctoral diss., Univ. de Poitiers; E. Arrault et Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D., 1862: Genera plantarum. 1.Rosaceae, pp. 600–629. — London: L. Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S., 1975: Ecological strategies of xylem evolution. — Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1977: Wood anatomy ofBuxaceae: Correlations with ecology and phylogeny. — Flora172: 463–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Further concepts in ecological wood anatomy, with comments on recent work in wood anatomy and evolution. — Aliso9: 499–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. S., Dickison, W. C., 1976: The morphology and relationships ofOncotheca balansae. — Bot. Gaz.137: 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1976: The seeds of dicotyledons. 1. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. M. T., 1980: A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.80: 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickison, W. C., 1978: Comparative anatomy ofEucryphiaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.65: 722–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Diverse nodal anatomy of theCunoniaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.67: 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Contributions to the morphology and anatomy ofStrasburgeria and a discussion of the taxonomic position of theStrasburgeriaceae. — Brittonia33: 564–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Fruits and seeds of theCunoniaceae. — J. Arnold Arbor.65: 149–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Further observations on the floral anatomy and pollen morphology ofOncotheca (Oncothecaceae). — Brittonia38: 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1977: The morphology and relationships ofParacryphia (Paracryphiaceae). — Blumea23: 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: Pollen morphology of theDilleniaceae andActinidiaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.69: 1055–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1987: The early evolution of the angiosperm flower. — Tree2: 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., Melchior, H., 1925:Medusagynaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn.,21: 50–52. — Berlin: Bornträger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., 1952: Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. — Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1960: The acetolysis method. A revised description. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.54: 561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focke, W. O., 1895:Eucryphiaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien,3 (6), pp. 129–131. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1912: L'origine et le système phylétique des angiosperms. — Arch. Neerland. Sci. Exactes & Nat., ser. 2,1: 146–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley, W. B., 1905:Medusagyne oppositifolia J. G. Baker. — Hook. Icones Plantarum, Ser. 4,8: 1–3, PI. 2790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J., Wolfe, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 538–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A., 1979: The stem-node-leaf continuum of theDicotyledoneae. — InMetcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., (Eds.): Anatomy of the dicotyledons. 1–2nd edn, pp. 76–87. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1926: The families of flowering plants. Dicotyledons. — London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973: The families of flowering plants. 3rd edn. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A., 1940: Plant microtechnique. — New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keng, H., 1962: Comparative morphological studies inTheaceae. — University California Publ. Bot.33: 269–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kribs, D. A., 1968: Commercial foreign woods on the American market. — New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionnet, G., undated: Striking plants of Seychelles. — London: G. T. Phillips.

  • Mabberley, D. J., 1987: The plant book. A portable dictionary of the higher plants. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., 1972:Bonnetiaceae. — In The botany of the Guayana Highland9. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.23: 131–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,Clare, C. C. Jr., 1973:Tetrameristaceae. — In: The botany of the Guayana Highland9. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.23: 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the dicotyledons. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, W. R., 1974: Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.68: 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., 1972:Caryocaraceae. — In: The botany of the Guayana Highland9. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.23: 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1973:Caryocaraceae. — Flora neotropica monograph12. — New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter, J., 1974: The endemic flowering plants of the Seychelles: an annotated list. — Candollea29: 345–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R., 1978a: Reproductive anatomy ofActinidia chinensis (Actinidiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.100: 149–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1978b:Actinidiaceae, Davidiaceae, andParacryphiaceae: systematic considerations. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.100: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, E. K., 1968: Petiole anatomy of theGuttiferae and related families. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.18: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1986: Floristic regions of the world. Appendix, pp. 305–356. — Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1976: A phylogenetic classification of theAngiospermae. — Evol. Biol.9: 35–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1983: Proposed new realignment in the angiosperms. — Nordic J. Bot.3: 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heel, W. A., 1987: Androecium development inActinidia chinensis, andA. melanandra (Actinidiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.109: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. W., Doyle, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 664–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C., 1973: A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. (Revised byH. K. Airy Shaw). 8th edn. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 27599, NC, USA

    William C. Dickison

Authors
  1. William C. Dickison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickison, W.C. The morphology and relationships ofMedusagyne (Medusagynaceae). Pl Syst Evol 171, 27–55 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940595

Key words

Search

Navigation