Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Foraging is one of the most important endeavors undertaken by animals, and it has been studied intensively from both mechanistic-empirical and optimal foraging perspectives. Planktivorous fish make excellent study organisms for foraging studies because they feed frequently and in a relatively simple environment. Most optimal foraging studies of planktivorous fish have focused, either on diet choice or habitat selection and have assumed that these animals used a cruise search foraging strategy. We have recently recognized that white crappie do not use a cruise search strategy (swimming continuously and searching constantly) while foraging on zooplankton but move in a stop and go pattern, searching only while paused. We have termed thissaltatory search. Many other animals move in a stop and go pattern while foraging, but none have been shown to search only while paused. Not only do white crappie search in a saltatory manner but the components of the search cycle change when feeding on prey of different size. When feeding on large prey these fish move further and faster after an unsuccessful search than when feeding on small prey. The fish also pause for a shorter period to search when feeding on large prey. To evaluate the efficiency of these alterations in the search cycle, a net energy gain simulation model was developed. The model computes the likelihood of locating 1 or 2 different size classes of zooplankton prey as a function of the volume of water scanned. The volume of new water searched is dependent upon the dimensions of the search volume and the length of the run. Energy costs for each component of the search cycle, and energy gained from the different sized prey, were assessed. The model predicts that short runs produce maximum net energy gains when crappie feed on small prey but predicts net energy gains will be maximized with longer runs when crappie feed on large prey or a mixed assemblage of large and small prey. There is an optimal run length due to high energy costs of unsuccessful search when runs are short and reveal little new water, and high energy costs of long runs when runs are lengthy. The model predicts that if the greater search times observed when crappie feed on small prey are assessed when they feed on a mixed diet of small and large prey, net energy gained is less than if small prey are deleted from the diet. We believe the model has considerable generality. Many animals are observed to move in a saltatory manner while foraging and some are thought to search only while stationary. Some birds and lizards are, known to modify the search cycle in a manner similar to white crappie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SST (sec):

Successful search time — the average time stationary prior to a pursuit

USST (sec):

Unsuccessful search time — the average time stationary prior to a run

PT (sec):

Pursuit time-PL/SS — the time to pursue prey at a given distance away. It is calculated by dividing the pursuit distance by swim speed

RT (sec):

Run time-RL/SS — the time to complete a run of a given length. It is calculated by dividing the run length, by swim speed

PL (cm):

Pursuit length-distance moved to attack prey

RL (cm):

Run length-distance moved between consecutive searches

SS (cm/sec):

Swim speed — the speed of movement during a pursuit or run

LS (l):

Location space — the area or volume within which prey are located. In the case of white crappie the search space is shaped like a pie wedge with the fish positioned at the apex of the wedge

LA (o):

Location angle—the angle of the wedge-shaped search space

LH (cm):

Location height—the height of the wedge-shaped search space

LD (cm):

Location distance—the length of long axis of the wedge-shaped search space.

RND:

Random number-random number generated through BASICA

SV (l):

Search volume—the volume of water actually searched after one run of given length

SVMAX (l):

Maximum search volume—the greatest search volume that can be based upon LA, LH, LD and unaffected by the previous search

SVR (l):

Search volume researched—that volume of SVMAX that is researched where RL<LD (see Appendix A)

SVo :

Search volume unsearched—that volume of SVMAX not previously searched

AD (#/1):

Absolute density—the density of zooplankton prey in numbers per liter

VD (#):

Visual density—the number of zooplankton prey in the search volume

LP (%):

Location probability—the probability that one or more prey are in the search volume

NEG (cal/sec):

Net energy gain-total calories ingested, less total calories used, divided by total time.

E e (cal):

Energy expended on the search cycle

E i (cal):

Energy intake

e p (cal):

Energy content of a given individual prey

P i :

Total number of prey ingested

e r (cal):

Energy expended while searching

e s (cal):

Energy expended while swimming

T t (sec):

Total time-time expended to eat a given number of prey

References

  • Anderson M (1981) On optimal predator search. Theor Pop Biol 19:58–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RA, Karasov WH (1981) Contrasts in energy intake and expenditure in sit-and-wait and widely foraging, lizards. Oecologia 49:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker MC (1974) Foraging behavior of black-bellied plovers (Pluvialis squatarola). Ecology 55:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett JR, Sutherland DB (1965) Respiratory metabolism of pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in relation to swimming speed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 22:405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman HI, Marcotte BM (1987) The effect of zooplankton abundance on feeding behavior and prey size selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar) alevins Holarct Ecol 10:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownsmith CB (1977) Foraging rates of Starlings in two habitats. Condor 79:386–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverton J, Kacelnik A, Krebs J (1985) Optimal foraging constraints and currencies. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, pp 119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1968) On the methods of resource division in grassland bird communities. Am Nat 102:107–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML (1971) Finch flocks in the Mohave desert. Theor Pop Biol 2:142–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Confer JL, Blades PI (1975) Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol Oceanogr 20:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins KW, Wuycheck JC (1971) Caloric equivalents for investigations in ecological energetics. Mitt Int Ver Limnol 18:1–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1976) The Ethology of Predation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1983) Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1987) Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behavior. Can J Zool 65:803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt RC (1979) The adaptive syndromes of two guilds of insectivorous birds in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 49:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlinger TJ (1986) Learning, sampling and the role of individual variability in the foraging behavior of bluegill sunfish. Ph.D. Thesis Michigan State University

  • Ehlinger TJ, Wilson DS (1988) Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:1878–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans BI (1986) Strategies and tactics of search behavior in salmonid and centrarchid planktivorous fish. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans BI, O'Brien WJ (1986) An analysis of the feeding rate of white crappie. Dev Env Biol Fish 7:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans BI, O'Brien WJ (1988) A re-analysis of the search cycle of a planktivorous salmonid. Can J fish Aquat Sci 45:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JW (1981) Search strategies of tyrant flycatchers. Anim Behav 29:810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz DRJ, Bradley PJ (1987) Fluctuations in prey density: effects on the foraging tactics of Scolopendrid centipedes Anim Behav 35:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost BJ (1978) The optokinetic basis of head-bobbing in the pigeon. J Exp Biol 74:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MB (1981) Mechanisms of size selectivity by planktivorous fish: a test of hypotheses. Ecology 62:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron RP, Staddon JER (1983) Searching for cryptic prey: The effect of search rate. Am Nat 121:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen J, Strickler JR (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J Fish Res Board Can 34:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene CH (1983) Selective predation in freshwater zooplankton communities. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 68:297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner F (1965) Sensory mechanisms and environmental clues used by the American robin in locating earthworms. Condor 67:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huey RB, Pianka ER (1981) Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fish. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J (1982) Comparison of searching behavior for zooplankton in an obligate planktivore, blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis) and a facultative plantivore, blegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Can J Fish Aq Sci 39:1649–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Krebs JR, Pulliam HR (1987) Foraging Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenagy GJ (1974) Daily and seasonal patterns of activity and energetics in a heteromyid rodent community. Ecology 54:1201–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleerekoper H, Timms AM, Westlake GF, Davy FB, Malar T, Anderson VM (1970) An analysis of locomotor behavior of goldfish (Carassius auratus). Anim. Behav 18:317–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landres PB, McMahon JA (1980) Guilds and community organization: analysis of an oak woodland avifuana in Sonora, Mexico. Auk 97:351–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaro X (1987) A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviors, selectiveness, and impacts Hydrobiol 146:97–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1975) The limits of optimization. In: Proceedings Can. Mathematical Conference, Mathematics in the Life Sciences, pp 49–60

  • Loveless BS (1985) Feeding rates of white crappie (Pomoxis annularis) in a Kansas reservoir. MA Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On the optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte BM, Browman HI (1986) Foraging behavior in fishes: perspectives on variance. Env Biol Fishes 16:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PL (1979) A possible sensory function for the stop-go patterns of running phorid flies. Physiol Entomol 4:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (1983) Optimal foraging and growth in bluegills. Oecologia 59:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moermond TC (1979) The influence of habitat structure onAnolis foraging behavior. Behavior 70:147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moermond TC (1986) A mechanistic approach to the structure of animal communities: Anolis lizards and birds. Am Zool 26:23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J (1984) Search strategies of wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) and stonechats (Saxicola torguata): adaptive variation in perch height, search time, sally distance and inter-perch move length. J Anim Ecol 53:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Williams SL, Pitelka FA (1980) An experimental analysis of prey availability for sanderlings (Aves: Scolopacidae) feeding on sandy beach crustaceans. Can J Zool 58:1564–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolskii GV (1969) Theory of fish population dynamics (translated by J.E.S. Bradley), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RA (1977) An ecological theory on foraging time and energetics and choice of optimal food-searching method. J Anim Ecol 46:511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RA (1981) Optimal flight speeds in birds when feeding young. J Anim Ecol 50:473–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ (1987) Planktivory by freshwater fish: thrust and parry in the pelagia. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, pp 3–16

  • O'Brien WJ, Slade NA, Vinyard GL (1976) Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 57:1304–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Evans BI, Luecke C (1985) Apparent size choice of zooplankton by planktivorous sunfish: exceptions to the rule. Env Biol Fish 13:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Evans BI, Howick G (1986) A new view of the predation cycle of a planktivorous fish, white crappic (Pomoxis annularis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1894–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Browman HI, Evans BI Search strategies of foraging animals. Am Sci (in press)

  • Pianka ER (1966) Convexity desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 47:1055–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1978) Evolutionary Ecology. Harper and Row, Publishers

  • Pienkowski MW (1983) Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors. Anim Behav 31:244–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce GJ (1987) Search paths of foraging common shrewsSorex araneus. Anim Behav 35:1215–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce GJ, Ollason JG (1987) Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time. Oikos 49:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietruszka RD (1986) Search tactics of desert lizards: how polarized are they? Anim Behav 34:1742–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoret Pop Biol 13:72–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringler NH (1983) Functional responses of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) to invertebrate drift. J Freshwater Ecol 2:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SK, Holmes RT (1982) Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology 63:1918–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JHM (1974a) A food searching behavior of two European thrushes. I. Description and analysis of search paths. Behaviour 48:276–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JNM (1974b) The food searching behavior of two European thrushes. II: The adaptiveness of the search patterns. Behavior LIX:1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speakman JR (1986) The optimum search speed of terrestrial predators when feeding on sedentary prey: a predictive model. J Theor Biol 122:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC, Schmidt-Hempel P (1987) Evolutionary insights should not be wasted. Oikos 49:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard GL, O'Brien WJ (1976) Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) J Fish Res Board Can 33:2845–2849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware D (1975a) Growth, metabolism and optimal swimming speed of a pelagic fish. J Fish Res Board Can 32:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware D (1975b) Relation between egg size, growth and natural mortality of larval fish. J Fish Res Board Can 32:2503–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1975) Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion. Bull Fisher Res Board Can 190:1–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1984) Body form, locomotion and foraging in aqutic vertebrates. Am Zool 24:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1974) Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae) Ecology 58:869–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ (1981) The role of foraging profitability and experience in habitat use by the bluegill sunfish. Ecology 62:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983a) Experimental test of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1525–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach, GG (1983b) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer JK, Bishop CJ (1985) Planktivore prey selection: the reactive field volume model versus the apparent size model. Ecology 66:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright D, O'Brien WJ (1984), The development and field test of a tactical model of the planktivorous feeding white crappie (Pomoxis annularis). Ecol Monogr 54:65–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behv 16:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John O'Brien, W., Evans, B.I. & Browman, H.I. Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia 80, 100–110 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789938

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00789938

Key words

Navigation