Abstract
This study analyzes factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices using logit analysis. In particular, the proposition that agroforestry practices have not been adopted by poor households is tested using data from West Godavari in the province of Andhra Pradesh, India. Innovation-decision process was used to guide the selection of variables used in the analysis. The results support the criticism that higher income farmers are the main beneficiaries of agroforestry if only farm forestry is considered. The results, however, do not support the criticism in the case of adoption of home gardens.
References
Alavalapati JRR (1990) An analysis of factors influencing social forestry adoption: implications for forestry extension. Unpublished MSc Thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton
Barnes DF, Allen TC and Ramsey W (1982) Social forestry in developing nations. Resource Discussion Paper D-73 F. Resources for the Future, Washington DC
Ben-Akiva M and Lerman SR (1987) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge
Biswas MR and Biswas AK (1985) The skrinking forests: a threat to survival. Development and Cooperation 3: 15–17
Bose SP (1962) Peasant values and innovation in India. American Journal of Sociology 67: 552–600
Chou GC (1983) Applications of Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
Chowdhry K (1983) Social forestry and the rural poor. Discussion Paper Series No 10, Ford Foundation, New Delhi, 33 pp
Chowdhry K (1986) Wasteland and the rural poor: India. In: FAO (ed) Five Perspectives on Forestry for Rural Development in the Asia-Pacific Region. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok
D'Souza G, Cyphers D and Phipps T (1993) Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (October): 159–165
Evans PT (1988) Designing agroforestry innovations to increase their adoptability: a case study from Paraguay. Journal of Rural Studies 4(1): 45–55
FAO (1978) Forestry for local community development. Forestry Paper No 7, Rome
FAO (Undated) Forests, trees and people. Forestry Topics Report No 2, Rome
Foley G and Barnard G (1984) Farm and community forestry. Earthscan Technical Report, No 3, London
Gregerson HM (1988) People, trees, and rural development: the role of social forestry. Journal of Forestry 86(10): 22–30
Hebden J (1983) Applications of Econometrics. Philip Allan Publishers Ltd, Oxford
Hoffer CR and Strangland D (1958) Farmers' attitudes and values in relation to adoption of approved practices in corn growing. Rural Sociology 23: 112–120
Jordan CBK (1988) Forestry program fights rural poverty. Journal of Forestry 86(5): 37–40
Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Quantitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raiford W (1987) Social forestry: an answer to deforestation? Development and Cooperation 4: 15–17
Raintree JB (1983) Strategies for enhancing the adoptability of agroforestry innovations. Agroforestry Systems 1: 173–187
Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York
Sen D and Das PK (1987) The management of people's participation in community forestry: some issues. Network Paper No 4d. Social Forestry Network, London, ODI, 12 pp
Sen D and Das PK (1988) Extension in social forestry: Problem areas and needed solutions. In: Shingi PM (ed) Planning Forestry Extension Programs India, pp 11–18. Papers presented at IIMA/FAO-RFEDP Workshop, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
Shiva V, Sharatchandra HC and Bandyopadhyay J (1987) Social forestry for whom? In: Korten DC (ed) Community Management: Asian Experience and Perspectives. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, Connecticut
Singh KA (1985) An evaluation study on the effectiveness of social forestry program in Andhra Pradesh. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India
Trivedi G (1963) Measurement of analysis of socio-economic status of rural families. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi
White JK (1993) SHAZAM User's Reference Manual 7.0. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alavalapati, J.R.R., Luckert, M.K. & Gill, D.S. Adoption of agroforestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh, India. Agroforest Syst 32, 1–14 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713844
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713844