Skip to main content
Log in

Filters and supports in orthoalgebras

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An orthoalgebra, which is a natural generalization of an orthomodular lattice or poset, may be viewed as a “logic” or “proposition system” and, under a welldefined set of circumstances, its elements may be classified according to the Aristotelian modalities: necessary, impossible, possible, and contingent. The necessary propositions band together to form a local filter, that is, a set that intersects every Boolean subalgebra in a filter. In this paper, we give a coherent account of the basic theory of Orthoalgebras, define and study filters, local filters, and associated structures, and prove a version of the compactness theorem in classical algebraic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfsen, E., and Shultz, F. (1976). Non-commutative spectral theory for affine function spaces on convex sets,Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society,172.

  • Beran, L. (1984).Orthomodular Lattices, Reidel/Academia, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics,Annals of Mathematics,37, 823–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (1985). Banach spaces of weights on quasimanuals,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,24(11), 1113–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Andrea, A., and De Lucia, P. (1991). The Brooks-Jewett theorem on an Orthomodular lattice,Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,154, 507–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. (1962). A note on orthomodular lattices,Portugaliae Mathematica,21(1), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D. (1989). Coupled physical systems,Foundations of Physics,7, 905–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D., and Randall, C. (1981). Operational statistics and tensor products, inInterpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, H. Neumann, ed., Vol. 5, Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golfin, A. (1987). Representations and products of lattices, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greechie, R., and Gudder, S. (1971). Is a quantum logic a logic?,Helvetica Physica Acta,44, 238–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greechie, R., and Gudder, S. (1973). Quantum logics, inContemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory, C. Hooker, ed., Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudder, S. (1988).Quantum Probability, Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardegree, G., and Frazer, P. (1981). Charting the labyrinth of quantum logics, inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. van Fraassen, eds., Ettore Majorana International Science Series, 8, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. (1963). Quantifiers on quasi-orthomodular lattices, Ph.D. thesis, Wayne State University.

  • Jauch, J. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmbach, G. (1983).Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kläy, M., Randall, C., and Foulis, D. (1987). Tensor products and probability weights,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,26(3), 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, P., and Hardegree, G. (1984a). Connections among quantum logics, Part 1, Quantum prepositional logics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,24(1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, P., and Hardegree, G. (1984b). Connections among quantum logics, Part 2, Quantum event logics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,24(1), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C. (1964). Axiomatique quantique,Helvetica Physica Acta,37, 439–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C. (1976).Foundations of Quantum Physics, A. Wightman, ed., Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, A. (1966). A theorem on two commuting observables,Journal of Mathematics and Mechancis,15(2), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, C., and Foulis, D. (1979). New definitions and theorems, University of Massachusetts Mimeographed Notes, Amherst, Massachusetts, Autumn 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, C., and Foulis, D. (1981a). Empirical logic and tensor products, inInterpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, H. Neumann, ed., Vol. 5, Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, C., and Foulis, D. (1981b). What are quantum logics and what ought they to be?, inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. van Fraassen, eds., Ettore Majorana International Science Series 8, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, G. (1979). Non-commutative measure theory, Habilitationsschrift, University of Bern, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, G. (1989). The approximate Jordan-Hahn decomposition,Canadian Journal of Mathematics,41(6), 1124–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, U. (1954). On orthocomplemented lattices satisfying the exchange axiom,Hiroshima Japan University Journal of Science Series A,17(3), 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, C. (1986). Decompositions of measures on orthologics, Ph.D. thesis, University of Berne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlichny, G. (1986). Quantum supports and modal logic,Foundations of Physics,16(12), 1285–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlichny, G. (1990). On the inverse FPR problem: Quantum is classical,Foundations of Physics,20(6), 635–650.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foulis, D.J., Greechie, R.J. & Rüttimann, G.T. Filters and supports in orthoalgebras. Int J Theor Phys 31, 789–807 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678545

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678545

Keywords

Navigation