Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictions of species interactions from consumer-resource theory: experimental tests with grasshoppers and plants

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the ability of consumer-resource theory to predict direct and indirect interactions among species, using an experimental system of insect herbivores and herbaceous plants. Specifically, we examined interactions among three species of grasshoppers (Melanoplus femur-rubrum, Spharagemon collare, andPhoetaliotes nebrascensis; Orthoptera, Acrididae) and herbaceous plants in experimental field cages placed over existing fertilized or unfertilized vegetation in a Minnesota old field. For the conditions inside these cages, we addressed whether (1) grasshopper diet predicted the presence of competition among grasshopper species, and (2) direct effects of grasshoppers on plants produced indirect interactions among plants, grasshoppers and soil nitrogen. Overall,M. femur-rubrum ate a greater proportion of forbs in cages, while the other two species ate primarily grasses. As expected, a pair of grasshopper species competed if they had similar diets. However, there were important exceptions that could be explained from observed indirect effects, although alternative explanations were also possible. First, all three grasshopper species significantly shifted their diets in the presence of other species, and these shifts occurred most often when competition was expected or occurred. Second, the two grassfeeding species reduced the biomass of the dominant grass (Schizachyrium scoparium) and increased available soil nitrogen and biomass of forbs. This effect may explain why the grass-feedingP. nebrascensis had a positive effect on the forb-feedingM. femur-rubrum on unfertilized plots. Overall, we show that direct effects of consumers on resources can predict competition and other important indirect interactions within a community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. Am Nat 124:80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1986) Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theor Pop Biol 29:107–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1987) Indirect interactions between species that share a predator. In: Kerfoot CJ, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ Press New England, Honaver, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1988) Resource productivity-consumer species diversity: simple models of competition in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecology 69:1418–1433

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1990) Adaptive responses of generalist herbivores to competition: convergence or divergence. Evol Ecol 4:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1986a) Generalist herbivore foraging and its role in competitive interactions. Am Zool 26:51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1986b) Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist herbivores. Oecologia 80:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ (1987) The effects of grazing: confounding of ecosystem, community and organism scales. Am Nat 129:777–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Heske EJ (1990) Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250:1705–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Davidson DW, Munger JC, Inouye RS (1986) Experimental community ecology: the desert granivore system. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DJ (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JB, Arnett WH, Lambley JD, Jantz OK, Knutson H (1974) Grasshoppers (Acrididae) of the Flint Hills native tallgrass prairie in Kansas. Kansas Agric Exper Sta Res Paper 19:

  • Chapin FS III, Vitousek PM, Van Cleve K (1986) The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. Am Nat 127:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivory defense. Science 230:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1980) Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:661–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans EW (1989) Interspecific interactions among phytophagous insects of tallgrass prairie: an experimental test. Ecology 70:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Faeth SH (1986) Indirect interactions between temporally separated herbivores mediated by the host plant. Ecology 67:479–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibert DW, Swift DM, Detling JK, Dyer MI (1981) Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization process. Oecologia 51:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition and the structure of prey communities. Theor Pop Biol 12: 197–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect effects, and coexistence of prey species. Am Nat 124:377–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntly NJ, Inouye RS (1988) Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. Bioscience 38:786–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye RS, Huntly NJ, Tilman D, Tester JR (1987) Pocket gophers, vegetation and soil nitrogen along a succession sere in east central Minnesota. Oecologia 72:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isely FB (1946) Differential feeding in relation to local distribution of grasshopers. Ecology 27:128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Joern A (1979) Feeding patterns in grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): factors influencing diet specialization. Oecologia 38:325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joern A, Lawlor LR (1980) Arid grassland grasshopper community structure: comparisons with neutral models. Ecology 61:591–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Joern A, Lawlor LR (1981) Guild structure in grasshopper assemblages based on food and microhabitat resources. Oikos 37:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R (1989) Community organization ofErigeron glaucus folivores: effects of competition, predation, and host plant. Ecology 70:1028–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot C, Sih A (eds) (1987) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ Press New England, Hanover, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor LR (1979) Direct and indirect effects of n-species competition. Oecologia 43:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Strong DH Jr (1981) Community patterns and competition in folivorous insects. Am Nat 118:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine SH (1976) Competition interactions in ecosystems. Am Nat 110:903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda SM, Keeler KH, Holt RD (1990) Herbivore influences on plant performance and competitive interactions. In: Grace J, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: The influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1982) Mutualistic interactions among species. Nature 296:803–804

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing system: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 53:291–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RG (1981) Simultaneous statistical inference. McGraw-Hill, New York Mulkern GB (1967) Food selection by grasshoppers. Ann Rev Entomol 12:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkern GB, Pruess KP, Knutson H, Hagen AF, Campbell JB; Lambley JD (1969) Food habits and preferences of grassland grasshoppers (Acrididae) of the North Central Great Plains. N Dakota St Univ Agric Exper Sta Bull 481

  • Power ME (1990) Effects of fish in river food webs. Science 250:811–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1985) Foraging efficiency, resource partitioning, and the coexistence of sparrow species. Ecology 66:1829–1836

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie ME (1988) Individual variation in the ability of Columbian ground squirrels to select an optimal diet. Evol Ecol 2:232–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie ME, Tilman D (1992) Interspecific competition among grasshoppers and their effect on plant abundance in experimental field environments. Oecologia 89:524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothhaupt KO (1988) Mechanistic resource competition theory applied to laboratory experiments with zooplankton. Nature 333:660–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sale PF (1974) Overlap in resource use and interspecific competition. Oecologia 17:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ (1987) Indirect interactions between prey: apparent competition, predator aggregation, and habitat segregation. Ecology 68:1887–1897

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) Some methods for calculating competition coefficients from resource utilization spectra. Am Nat 108:322–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1976) Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: models of intermediate complexity. Theor Popul Biol 10:309–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1978) Effects of density-restricted food encounter on some single-level competition models. Theoretical Population Biology 13:365–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AD, Shandruk LJ (1979) Comparison of fecal, rumen, and utilization methods for estimating pronghorn diet. J Range Manage 32:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, FJ Rohlf (1980) Biometry. Freeman Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DR, Malechek JC (1968) Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. J Range Manage 21:264–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1976) Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory. Science 192:463–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1980) Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am Nat 116:362–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:683–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer JH (1980) Indirect mutualism: variations on a theme by Stephen Levine. Am Nat 116:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD, Tilman D (1991) Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology 72:1050–1065

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Utah State University, 84322-5210, Logan, UT, USA

    Mark E. Ritchie

  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 55108, St. Paul, MN, USA

    David Tilman

Authors
  1. Mark E. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Tilman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchie, M.E., Tilman, D. Predictions of species interactions from consumer-resource theory: experimental tests with grasshoppers and plants. Oecologia 94, 516–527 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566967

Keywords

Search

Navigation