Skip to main content
Log in

Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing literature that attempts to define the substantive rights of employees in the workplace, a.k.a. the duties of employers toward their employees. Following Nozick, this article argues that — so long as there is a competitive labor market — to set up a class of moral rights in the workplace invades workers' rights to freely choose the terms and conditions of employment they judge best.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birch, David: 1981, ‘Who creates jobs?’, Public Interest (vol. 65), fall.

  • Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Robert: 1985, Choosing the Right Pond (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alan: 1980, ‘Business ethics: profits, utilities, and moral rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 3.

  • McKenzie, Robert: 1981, ‘The case for plant closures’, Policy Review 15, winter.

  • Nozick, Robert: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Adina: 1984, ‘Autonomy in the workplace’, in Tom Regan, ed., Just Business (Random House, N.Y.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, Patricia H.: 1985, Persons, Rights and Corporations (Prentice Hall, N.Y.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, N.Y.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ian Maitland is associate professor of business, government and society at the University of Minnesota. He is author of The Causes of Industrial Disordoer (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983) and articles in the Journal of Politics, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Strategy, British Journal of Industrial Relations, California Management Review and elsewhere. In 1988 he ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Congress.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maitland, I. Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument. J Bus Ethics 8, 951–954 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383431

Keywords

Navigation