Skip to main content
Log in

Central nervous system effects and visual fatigue in VDT workers

  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To assess central nervous system effects and visual fatigue induced by work with visual display terminals (VDT), symptom frequency was assessed and visual evoked potential (VEP), critical flicker fusion (CFF) and near-point distance were measured in 24 female keypunchers before and after 2.5 h of VDT work and in 6 non-VDT-exposed subjects at the same intervals. Each keypuncher had been engaged in data entry for 1–7 (mean, 4) years. After VDT work, the number of complaints of subjective fatigue as well as an objective measure of near-point distance were significantly increased as compared with those before work; also, the N75, P100 and N145 latencies of VEP were significantly prolonged. The change of P100 latency during VDT work was inversely correlated with the number of years worked in data entry. No significant change was seen in any of these tests in the non-VDT-exposed subjects. The changes in N75 latency and subjective fatigue related to drowsiness and dullness in the keypunchers were significantly larger than those in the non-VDT-exposed subjects. The CFF was significantly lower in keypunchers than in non-VDT-exposed subjects in both the first and the second tests. These data suggest that VDT work is associated with impairment of the visual nervous system function, that VEP latencies appear to be a sensitive indicator of visual fatigue, at least transiently, and that CFF appears to be a good parameter for estimations of chronic visual fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araki S, Murata K, Aono H (1987) Central and peripheral nervous system dysfunction in workers exposed to lead, zinc and copper: a follow-up study of visual and somatosensory evoked potentials. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baschera P, Grandjean E (1979) Effects of repetitive tasks with difficulty on critical fusion (CFF) and subjective state. Ergonomics 22:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergqvist U (1989) Possible health effects of working with VDUs. Br J Ind Med 46:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gould JD, Grischkowsky N (1984) Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Hum Factors 26:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gulmann NC, Hammerberg PE, Jensen LB, Sommerbeck KW, Ørbaek K (1979) Visual evoked potential in patients with cerebral asthenopia. Acta Neurol Scand 59:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwasaki T, Kurimoto S (1988) Eye-strain and changes in accommodation of the eye and in visual evoked potential following quantified visual load. Ergonomics 31:1743–1751

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knave BG, Wibom RI, Voss M, Hedstrom LD, Berqgvist UOV (1985) Work with video display terminals among office employees: I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. Scand J Work Environ Health 11:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kumashiro M, Mikami K, Hasegawa T (1984) Effects of visual and mental strain on VDT performance (in Japanese, with English abstract). Jpn J Ind Health 26:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuorinka I (1981) Discomfort and motor skills in semi-paced tasks. In: Salvendy G, Smith MJ (eds) Machine pacing and occupational stress. Taylor Francis Ltd, New York, pp 267–272

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lueders H, Lesser RP, Klem G (1980) Pattern evoked potentials. In: Henry CE (ed) Current clinical neurophysiology: update on EEG and evoked potentials. Elsevier, New York, pp 467–526

    Google Scholar 

  11. Misawa T, Shigeta S (1986) An experimental study of work load on VDT performance: II. Effects of difference in input devices (in Japanese, with English abstract). Jpn J Ind Health 28:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  12. Misawa T, Yoshino K, Shigeta S (1984) An experimental study on the duration of a single spell of work on VDT performance (in Japanese, with English abstract). Jpn J Ind Health 26:296–302

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murata K, Araki S, Aono H (1987) Visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in lead-exposed workers (in Japanese, with English abstract). Jpn J EEG EMG 15:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ossenblok P, Spekreijse H (1988) Visual evoked potentials as indicators of the workload at visual display terminals. Ergonomics 31:1437–1448

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simonson E, Brozek J (1952) Flicker fusion frequency: background and applications. Physiol Rev 32:349–378

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sokol S (1986) Visual evoked potentials. In: Aminoff MJ (ed) Electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 441–466

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sugita M, Minowa H, Ishii M, Etoh R (1986) Factors affecting subjective symptoms of VDT workers (in Japanese, with English abstract). Jpn J Ind Health 28:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization (1987) Visual display terminals and workers′ health. (Offset publication 99) WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshitake H (1978) Three characteristic patterns of subjective fatigue symptoms. Ergonomics 21:231–233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murata, K., Araki, S., Kawakami, N. et al. Central nervous system effects and visual fatigue in VDT workers. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 63, 109–113 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379073

Key words

Navigation