Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of position effect variegation in Drosophila

III. Continuous and discontinuous compaction of chromosomal material as a result of position effect variegation

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Variations in compaction of chromosomal material of the rearrangements Dp(1;f) 1337, Dp(1;f) R, Dp(1;1)pn2b, and T(1;4)w m258-21, which display an extended position effect, were characterized. Morphological changes found in these rearangements were assigned to two major types: (i) continuous compaction, in which bands and interbands located distal to the eu/heterochromatin junction fuse into one compacted block of chromatin. The extent of compaction is increased by enhancers of position effect (low temperature, removal of the Y or 2R chromosome heterochromatin). In extreme cases compaction extends over dozens of bands. (ii) Discontinuous compaction, in which at least two zones of compaction separated by morphologically normal zones can readily be identified. As a result, some regions located at a greater distance from heterochromatin may be compacted more frequently than others than map nearer to it. A few regions (1D, 2B1-12, 2D) were shown to be most frequently compacted in all rearrangements investigated. The 2B13-18, 2C1-2, 2E, and 2F regions exhibited the lowest frequencies of compaction. Compaction of the zone containing the 2B1-12 bands is always accompanied by inactivation of the ecs locus, which maps in the 2B3-5 puff. At the same time the 2C1-2 and 2E bands located nearer to the breakpoint can retain normal morphology and puffing in response to ecdysterone. The results are interpreted as morphological manifestations of the discontinuity of the spreading effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananiev EV (1974) Investigation of DNA replication and transcription in polytene chromosomes. Ph D thesis, Institute of Atomic Energy, Moscow

  • Ananiev EV, Gvozdev VA (1974) Changed pattern of transcription and replication in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster resulting from eu- and heterochromatin rearrangement. Chromosoma 45:173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyaeva ES, Aizenzon MG, Kiss I, Gorelova TD, Pak SD, Umbetova GH, Kramers PGN, Zhimulev IF (1982) Reports on new mutants. Dros Inf Serv 58:184–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Sh, Rastan S (1988) Age-related reactivation of an X-linked gene close to the inactivation center in the mouse. Genet Res 52:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark SH, Chovnick A (1986) Studies of normal and position-effected expression of rosy region genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 114:819–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell JK, Hartmann-Goldstein IJ (1980) Modification on the DNA content in translocated regions of Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Chromosoma 81:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Goldstein J (1967) On the relationship between heterochromatization and variegation in Drosophila, with special reference to temperature-sensitive period. Genet Res 10:143–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EN (1968) Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Wash Publ N627

  • Reuter G, Werner W, Hoffmann HJ (1982) Mutants affecting position-effect heterochromatization in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 85:539–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J (1947) The nature of heterochromatin. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 12:179

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J (1956) The relation of heterochromatic chromosome regions to the nucleic acids of the cell. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 21:307

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz J (1965) Genes, differentiation and animal development. Brookhaven Symp Biol 18:116–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Spofford JB (1976) Position-effect variegation in Drosophila. Genetics 25:534

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchkov EV, Balakireva MD, Alatorcev VE (1984) Inactivation of the X chromosome region with a known fine structure as a result of the variegated position effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics (USSR) 20:1846–1856

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Fomina OV, Protopopov MO, Bolshakov VN (1986) Cytogenetical and molecular aspects of position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Morphology and genetic activity of the 2AB region in chromosome rearrangement T(1;2)dorvar7. Chromosoma 94:492–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva FS, Bgatov AV, Baritcheva EM, Vlassova IE (1988) Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Peculiarities of morphology and genetic activity of the 2B region in the T(1;2)dorvar7 chromosome in males. Chromosoma 96:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhimulev IF, Belyaeva ES, Bolshakov VN, Mal'ceva NI (1989) Position-effect variegation and intercalary heterochromatin: a comparative study. Chromosoma 98:378–387

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

by W. Beermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belyaeva, E.S., Zhimulev, I.F. Cytogenetic and molecular aspects of position effect variegation in Drosophila . Chromosoma 100, 453–466 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364556

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364556

Keywords

Navigation