Skip to main content
Log in

Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Western harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis, preferentially utilize low vegetational cover pathways. Energetic costs for foraging ants were less than 0.1% of caloric rewards of harvested seeds, suggesting that reduction of energetic cost is not a major benefit of this preference. Walking speed was significantly faster on lower cover routes, increasing net return rates from equidistant artificial food sources. Undisturbed foragers on low cover routes traveled farther, increasing their total foraging area without increasing foraging time. These results suggest that in animals with low costs of locomotion relative to energetic rewards, time costs are more important than direct energetic costs in influencing foraging decisions. In baited experiments with equidistant food sources, preferential use of low cover routes resulted in a large increase in net energetic gain rate, but only a slight increase in energetic efficiency. Under natural conditions, net energetic gain rates were constant for foragers using low and high vegetational cover routes, but foragers using low cover paths had lower efficiencies. This suggests that net energetic gain rate is a more important currency than energetic efficiency for foraging harvester ants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein RA (1982) Foraging-area size and food density: Some predictive models. Theor Pop Biol 22:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens D, Toussaint N (1985) An experimental study of the foraging strategy of the wood ant Formica aquilonia. Anim Behav 33:541–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1977) Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58:711–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVita J (1979) Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave desert. Ecology 60:729–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (1988) Variation in the foraging patterns of the ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis in relation to variation in habitat structure. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Inter-individual variation in social insect behavior. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron RP, Staddon JER (1983) Searching for cryptic prey: The effect of search rate. Am Nat 121:172–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JM (1986) Caste-specific changes in honeybee flight capacity. Physiol Zool 59:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Gentry JM (1981) Foraging pattern, colony distribution and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 62:1467–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebling Beraldo MJA, Mendes EG (1982) The influence of temperature on oxygen consumption rates of workers of two leaf cutting ants Atta laevigaata (F Smith 1858) and Atta sexdens ribripilosa (Forel 1908). Comp Biochem Physiol 71:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1972) Energetics of temperature regulation and foraging in a bumblebee, Bombus terricola Kirby. J Comp Physiol 77:40–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1975) Energetics of pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard Univ Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder Bailey A, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia (Berl) 72:440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1970) Steatoda fulva (Theridiidae), a spider that feeds on harvester ants. Psyche 77:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1974) Home range orientation and territoriality in harvesting ants, Pogonomyrmex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:3271–3277

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Lumsden CJ (1980) Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210:732–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TF, Holm-Jensen I (1980) Energetic cost of running in workers of three ant species, Formica fusca L, Formica rufa L, and Camponotus herculeanus L (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Comp Physiol 137:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TF, Nielsen MG (1975) The influence of body size and temperature on worker ant respiration. Nat Jutlandica 18:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA (1985) Nutritional and physical attributes of seeds of some common sagebrush-steppe plants: Some implications for ecological theory and management. J Range Manage 38:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: The relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia (Berl) 68:327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeigh SC, West GC (1965) Caloric values of plant seeds eaten by birds. Ecology 46:553–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighton JRB, Bartholomew GA, Feener DH (1987) Energetics of locomotion and a model of the energy cost of foraging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica Guer. Physiol Zool 60:524–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen MG (1986) Respiratory rates of ants from different climatic areas. J Insect Physiol 32:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen MG, Jensen TF, Holm-Jensen I (1982) Effect of load carriage on the respiratory metabolism of running worker ants of Camponotus herculeanus (Formicidae). Oikos 39:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1981) Bumblebee response to variation in nectar availability. Ecology 62:1648–1661

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1981) Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: A disposable caste? Behav Ecol Sobiobiol 9:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants. Oecologia (Berl) 36:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1980) Optimal foraging in bumblees: Calculation of net rate of energy intake and optimal patch choice. Theor Popul Biol 17:232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Optimal travel speeds of animals. Am Nat 118:475–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW (1981) Prey preferences in the desert horned lizard: influence of prey foraging method and aggressive behavior. Ecology 62:1031–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollack GB (1984) Worker size variability and foraging efficiency in Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P, Kacelnik A, Houston AI (1985) Honeybees maximize efficiency by not filling their crop. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens D, Krebs J (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR (1972) Running up and down hills: Some consequences of size. Science 178:1096–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1977) Foraging behavior of ants: Experiments with two species of Myrmecine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1977) Recruitment behavior, orientation, and the organization of foraging in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus DeGeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA, Fujita MS, Bowen RV (1984) Ant foraging behavior: Ambient temperature influences prey selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Vleck D (1978) The energetics of activity and growth: the energy cost of burrowing by pocket gophers and energy metabolism during growth and hatching of emu rhea and ostrich eggs. Ph D Dissertation, Univ Calif, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington KD, Holden LR (1979) Optimal foraging: On flower selection by bees. Am Nat 114:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG (1978) Foraging in seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex spp. Ecology 59:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Bryant M (1979) Behavior of a predator and its prey: The horned lizard (Phrynosoma cornutum) and harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp). Ecology 60:686–694

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fewell, J.H. Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 401–408 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294977

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294977

Keywords

Navigation