Skip to main content
Log in

Impression formation as a function of the sex role appropriateness of linguistic behavior

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences between perceptions of men's and women's language were investigated. Undergraduates (64 male, 64 female) read 14 short stories with male or female speakers using seven categories of “male” and “female” language. Subjects then rated stimulus persons on 23 sex role related adjectives. Male language was rated as more masculine, less feminine, more “instrumental,” and less “socially positive” than female language. Effects were strongest for the categories of expletives and adjectives, followed by weaker effects for hedges and polite forms. Subjects rated males who spoke women's language as homosexual; they tended to rate females who spoke men's language as uppity. The results are discussed in terms of Robin Lakoff's hypotheses concerning linguistic sex differences and in terms of inrole vs out-of-role behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, L. A., & Timm, L. A. More on women's and men's expletives. Anthropological Linguistics, 1976, 18, 438–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M., & deHaan, D. Speech differences between women and men: On the wrong track? Language in Society, 1979, 8, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, R., & Rosenkrantz, P. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Koziej, J. The perception of sex-inconsistent behavior. Sex Roles, 1978, 5, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypothesis. Language in Society, 1977, 6, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. Evaluations of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. The question of tag questions in women's speech: They don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, 1975, 4, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. The sociology of the language of American women. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelsky, C. The acquisition of communicative competence: Recognition of linguistic correlates of sex roles. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1976, 22, 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmer, H. T., & Haswell, L. Sex-role stereotyping in English usage. Sex Roles, 1977, 3, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, S. The dialectic of sex. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A. Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 616–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, A. C., Raskin, P. A., Libow, J. A., & Pravder, M. D. Gender and sex-role appropriateness: Bias in the judgment of disturbed behavior. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14–24. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, June, 1974, 82–85. (b)

  • Lakoff, R. Language and women's place. Language in Society, 1973, 2, 45–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao, R. C., Upchurch, W. H., Corwin, B. J., & Grossnickle, W. F. Biased attitudes toward females as indicated by ratings of intelligence and likeability. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 1315–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, J. P., & Sherriffs, A. The differential evaluation of males and females. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherriffs, A. C., & Jarrett, R. F. Sex differences in attitudes about sex differences. Journal of Psychology, 1953, 35, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherriffs, A. C., & McKee, J. P. Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, E. H. Person perception as a function of occupation and sex. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 679–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, C. M. Male-female use of expletives: A heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Lingusitics, 1978, 20, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, L. A. Review of Robin Lakoff's Language and women's place. Lingua, 1976, 39, 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldow, P. B. (1976). Effects of nonpathological sex-role stereotypes on students' evaluation of psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 4, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported here is based upon a thesis submitted by the first author to Tulane University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master's degree. The support of Professors Larry Dachowski, William P. Dunlap and Edgar C. O'Neal, members of the thesis committee, is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmussen, J.L., Moely, B.E. Impression formation as a function of the sex role appropriateness of linguistic behavior. Sex Roles 14, 149–161 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288246

Keywords

Navigation