Skip to main content
Log in

How valid is Cruziana Stratigraphy?

  • Published:
Geologische Rundschau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stratigraphic value of trilobite burrows has recently been questioned because of a seemingly Ordovician form in the Lower Cambrian of Canada. Closer examination shows, however, that the Cambrian homeomorph (Cruziana pectinata n. sp.) has a significantly different scratch pattern. This raises the question whether the multiple scratches of the Ordovician Cruziana rugosa were also made by exopodites or by similarly shaped endopodites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergström J (1972) Appendage morphology of the trilobite Cryptolithus and its implications. Lethaia 5 (1): 85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström J (1973) Organization, life and systematics of trilobites. Fossils and Strata 2: 1–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström J, Peel JS (1988) Lower Cambrian trace fossils from Northern Greenland. Rapp Grönlands Geol Unders 137: 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S (1990) Predation by early Cambrian trilobites on infaunal worms-evidence from the Swedish Mickwitzia Sandstone. Lethaia 23: 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Magwood JPA, Pemberton SG (1990) Stratigraphic significance of Cruziana: New data concerning the Cambrian-Ordovician ichnostratigraphic paradigm. Geology 18: 729–732

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin MAS, McMenamin DLS (1990) The Emergence of Animals: the Cambrian Breakthrough. Columbia University Press, New York, 217 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher A (1970) Cruziana stratigraphy of “non-fossiliferous” Paleozoic sandstones. In: Crimes TP, Harper JC (eds) Trace Fossils. Geol J Spec Issue 3: 447–476

  • Seilacher A (1990) Paleozoic trace fossils. In: Said R (ed) The Geology of Egypt. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1565–1581

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher A (1992) An updated Cruziana Stratigraphy of Gondwanan Paleozoic sandstones. In: Salem MS (ed) The Geology of Libya. Part 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher A (1993) Problems of correlation in the Nubian Sandstone Facies. In: Thorweihe U, Schandelmeier H (eds) Geoscientiflc Research in Northeast Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher A, Crimes TP (1969) “European” species of trilobite burrows in Eastern Newfoundland. Mem Am Assoc Petrol Geol 12: 145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher A, Pflüger F. From biomats to endo-benthic agriculture: a biohistoric trend, in press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seilacher, A. How valid is Cruziana Stratigraphy?. Geol Rundsch 83, 752–758 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251073

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251073

Key words

Navigation