Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three weakly electric fish (Gnathonemus petersii) were force-choice trained in a two-alternative procedure to discriminate between objects differing in their electrical characteristics. The objects were carbon dipoles in plexiglass tubing (length 2.5 cm, diameter 0.6 cm). Their electrical characteristics could be changed by varying the impedance of an external circuit to which they were connected (Fig. 1). In one (the ‘capacitance dipole’) the resistance was very low(< 3 Ω) and the capcitance variable. In the other (the ‘resistance dipole’) the resistance was variable and the capacitance low (<50 pF).

Capacitances from several hundred pF (‘lower thresholds’, Fig. 2) to several hundred nF (‘upper thresholds’, Fig. 3) could be discriminated from both insulators and good conductors. In all cases the reward-negative stimulus was the capacitance dipole, which was avoided by all fish spontaneously. Thresholds were defined at 70% correct choices.

The fish were then tested for their ability to discriminate between one object with a given capacitance and another with resistances varying from 3 Ω to 200 kΩ. The capacitance dipole continued to be the negative stimulus throughout. All 3 fish avoided it in at least 80% of the trials at each stimulus combination (Fig. 4). This result suggests that Gnathonemus perceives the capacitance and the resistance of objects differentially.

The effect of the dipole-objects as well as some natural objects on the local EOD was recorded differentially very close to the fish's skin (Fig. 5). The amplitude of the local EODs was affected by all types of objects as they approached the skin. However, the waveform was changed only by capacitance dipoles and some natural objects (Figs. 6 and 7). It appears that the fish perceive not only intensity changes in the local EOD but wave-form deformations as well and can thus distinguish objects of different complex impedances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EOD :

electric organ discharge

f max :

maximal spectral frequency

GP :

Gnathonemus petersii

LFS :

local filtered signal

PMA :

probing motor act

S+:

positive stimulus

S :

negative stimulus

References

  • Bastian J (1977) Variations in the frequency response of electroreceptors dependent on receptor location in weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J Comp Physiol 121:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J (1986) Electrolocation; behavior, anatomy, and physiology. In: Bullock TH, Heiligenberg W (eds) Electroreception. John Wiley & Sons, New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore, pp 577–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J (1987) Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: behavior. J Comp Physiol A 161:811–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbenoit P (1970) Conditionnement instrumental de l'électroperception des objets chez Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae, Teleostei, Pisces). Z Vergl Physiol 67:192–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC (1990) Mormyromast electroreceptor organs and their afferent fibers in Mormyrid fish. III. Physiological differences between two morphological types of fibers. J Neurophysiol 63:319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC, Grant K (1989) Corollary discharge inhibition and preservation of temporal information in a sensory nucleus of mormyrid electric fish. J Neurosci 9:1029–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC, Russel CJ (1978) Effect of electric organ discharge on ampullary receptors in a mormyrid. Brain Research 145:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC, Zakon H, Finger TE (1989) Mormyromast electroreceptor organs and their afferent fibers in Mormyrid fish: I. Morphology. J Comp Neurol 286:391–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MV1 (1971) Electroreception. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol V, Sensory systems and electric organs. Academic Press, New York London, pp 493–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng AS, Bullock TH (1977) Neuronal mechanisms for object discrimination in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. J Exp Biol 66:141–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellermann LW (1933) Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychol 42:206–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder W (1972) Nachweis aktiver (elektrischer) Ortung bei Mormyridae (Teleostei, Pisces). Z Tierpsychol 30:94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder W, Schief A, Uhlemann H (1967) Zur Empfindlichkeit des schwachelektrischen Fisches Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyriformes, Teleostei) gegenüber elektrischen Feldern. Z Vergl Physiol 54:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1973) Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). J Comp Physiol 87:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1975) Theoretical and experimental approaches to spatial aspects of electrolocation. J Comp Physiol 103:247–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1977) Principles of electrolocation and jamming avoidance in electric fish. A neuro-ethological approach. Studies in brain function, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissmann HW, Machin KE (1958) The mechanism of object location in Gymnarchus niloticus and similar fish. J Exp Biol 35:451–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JH (1982) Behavioral responses of weakly electric fish to complex impedances. J Comp Physiol 145:459–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1984) Angewandte Statistik (6. Aufl.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH (1974) The detection of electric fields from electric organs. In: Fessard A (ed) Electroreceptors and other specialized receptors in lower vertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol III/3). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH, Hamstra RH Jr (1973) Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: High-frequency receptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia. J Neurophysiol 36:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan HP (1963) Determination of biological impedances. In: Nastuk WL (ed) Physical techniques in biological research, vol VI. Academic Press, New York London, pp 323–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Toerring MJ, Belbenoit P (1979) Motor programmes and electroreception in Mormyrid fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson D, Bastian J (1979) Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in the weakly electric fish, Gymnotus carapo. J Comp Physiol 134:191–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von der Emde, G. Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii . J Comp Physiol A 167, 413–421 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192576

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192576

Key words

Navigation