Skip to main content
Log in

Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a shoal of four sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) individual fish had partners with whom they repeatedly performed pairwise predator inspection visits. In six different trials, we found two reciprocal pairs per trial significantly more often than would be expected by chance. These results provide further evidence for a TIT FOR TAT like cooperation strategy in sticklebacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Dion D (1988) The further evolution of cooperation. Science 242:1385–1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1989) Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game. J Theor Biol 136:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J Theor Biol 132:337–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1988) Do guppies play tit for tat during predator inspection visits? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:395–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MW, Thomas EAC (1987) Behavior-dependent contexts for repeated plays of the prisoner's dilemma II: dynamical aspects of the evolution of cooperation. J Theor Biol 128: 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer EA (1980) The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Anim Behav 28: 620–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht T (1989) Discriminating between hungry and satiated predators: the response of guppies (Poecilia reticulate) from high and low predation sites. Ethology 82:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD, Ligon SH (1978) Communal breeding in the green wood-hoopoe as a case for reciprocity. Nature (London) 176:496–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo MP (1985) Mutual restraint in tree swallows: a test of the TIT FOR TAT model of reciprocity. Science 227:1363–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Girling SL (1986) Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Anim Behav 34:510–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Higham A (1988) Information transfer across fish shoals under predator threat. Ethology 78:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Oulton WJ, Pitcher TJ (1985) Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Z Tierpsychol 67:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator-evasion behaviour in minnow shoals. Proc R Soc London Ser B 229:439–465

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Nature (London) 292:291–292

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1987) More evolution of cooperation. Nature (London) 327:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1983) Game theory and the evolution of cooperation. In: Bendall DS (ed) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press, pp 445–456

  • Milinski M (1985) Risk of predation of parasitized sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) under competition for food. Behaviour 93:203–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (1987) TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature (London) 325:433–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Külling D, Kettler R (1990) TIT FOR TAT: sticklebacks “trusting” a cooperating partner. Behav Ecol (in press)

  • Milinski M (1990) No alternative to TIT FOR TAT cooperation in sticklebacks. Anim Behav 39:989–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M, Sigmund K (1989) Oscillations in the evolution of reciprocity. J Theor Biol 137:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C (1977) Reciprocal altruism in Papio anubis. Nature (London) 265:441–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C (1986) Whatever happened to reciprocal altruism? Trends Ecol Evol 1:142–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck JR, Feldman MW (1986) The evolution of helping behavior in large randomly-mixed populations. Am Nat 127:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Green DA, Magurran AE (1986) Dicing with death: predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals. J Fish Biol 28:438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1984) Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature (London) 308:541–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JF, Atchison GF (1978) Predator-prey behaviour of fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, and largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, in a model ecosystem. J Fish Biol 13:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner GF, Pitcher TJ (1986) Attack abatement: a model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. Am Nat 228:228–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JM (1987) Vocally mediated reciprocity between neighouring groups of mantled howling monkeys, Alouatta palliata palliata. Anim Behav 35:1615–1627

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS (1984) Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature (London) 308:181–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: M. Milinski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milinski, M., Pfluger, D., Külling, D. et al. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27, 17–21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183308

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183308

Keywords

Navigation