Skip to main content
Log in

How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, adjust the direction and length of foraging trails in response to the foraging behavior of their conspecific neighbors. In the absence of any interaction with its neighbor, a mature colony expands its foraging range at a rate of 0.85 ± 0.15 m per day. Exclusion experiments show that if a colony is prevented from using its foraging trails, the neighbors of that colony will enter its foraging range within 10 days. Exclusion experiments were performed with three age classes of colonies: young (1 year old), intermediate (3–4 years old), and old (5 years old or more). Colonies 3–4 years old are most likely to expand foraging ranges, and to retain newly-gained areas. To examine the relation of colony age (in years) and colony size (in numbers of workers), colonies of known age were excavated. Colonies increase greatly in size in years 3 and 4. Foraging area may be of greater current or prospective value for younger, smaller, quickly growing colonies than for older, larger ones of stable size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams ES (1990) Boundary disputes in the territorial ant Azteca trigona: effects of asymmetries in colony size. Anim Behav 39:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality and sexual behaviour in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Beletsky LD, Orians GH (1987) Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. II. Removal experiments and site dominance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:339–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Beletsky LD, Orians GH (1989) Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. II. Testing hypotheses of territorial dominance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian MV (1973) Feeding and growth in the ant Myrmica. J Anim Ecol 42:37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen S, Stenseth NC (1989) Age-specific optimal diets and optimal foraging tactics: a life-historic approach. Theor Pop Biol 36:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1986) The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony. Anim Behav 34:1402–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1987) Group-level dynamics in harvester ants: young colonies and the role of patrolling. Anim Behav 35:833–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1989a) Ants distinguish neighbors from strangers. Oecologia 81:198–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1989b) Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Anim Behav 38:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. Am Nat 138:379–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1992) Nest relocation in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Ann Ent Soc Am 85:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM, Hölldobler B (1988) Worker longevity in harvester ants. Psyche 94:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1971) Interspecific competition and frequency changes among ants in Solomon Islands coconut plantations. J Appl Ecol 8:323–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P (1981) The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim Behav 29:193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder Bailey K, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Oecologia 72:440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1978) The multiple recruitment systems of the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:19–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1983) Chemical manipulation, enemy specification and intercolony communication in ant communities. In Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 354–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Lumsden CJ (1980) Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210:732–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler C (1984) Ecology of the ant Pogonomyrmex mayri: foraging and competition. Biotropica 16:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay WP (1981) A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. Psyche 88:25–75

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay WP (1985) A comparison of the energy budgets of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Oecologia 66:484–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1976) The influence of ants and ant manipulation on the cocoa farm fauna. J Appl Ecol 13:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J Theor Biol 47:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Rubinstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M (1984) Territory size in the moorhen (Gallinula chlorapus): an outcome of RHP asymmetry between neighbors. Anim Behav 32:861–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1985) Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:323–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert SE (1978) Games spiders play: behavioural variability in territorial disputes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1984) Worker size variability and foraging efficiency in Veromessor pergandei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW (1988) Dietary similarity and foraging range of two seed-harvester ants during resource fluctuations. Oecologia 75:362–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (1982) The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability. Am Zool 22:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti RT, Case TJ (1986) Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses. Oecologia 69:446–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneirla TC (1971) Army ants. In: Topoff H (ed) Freeman, San Francisco

  • Schoener TW (1977) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Simple models of optimal feeding-territory size: a reconciliation. Am Nat 121:440–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA, Eason PK (1989) Relationships between spacing behavior and growth rates: a field study of lizard feeding territories. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA, Tollestrup K (1984) Prospective resource defense in a territorial species. Am Nat 123:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber SW (1990) Cladistic phylogeny of the North American species complexes of Pogonomyrmex. Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1977) Foraging behavior of ants: experiments with two species of myrmecine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1978) Foraging behavior of ants: theoretical considerations. J Theor Biol 71:541–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoff H, Mirenda J (1980) Army ants on the move: relation between food supply and emigration frequency. Science 207:1099–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1989) Chemical trail systems, orientation and territorial interactions in the ant Lasius neoniger. J Insect Behav 2:339–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA, Levings SC (1986) Intra- and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology. Oecologia 69:413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth JL, Davis EG (1931) The red harvester ant and how to subdue it. USDA Farmer's Bull 1668:1–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to the second address

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, D.M. How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31, 417–427 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170609

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170609

Keywords

Navigation