Abstract
In this paper we argue that behind widely accepted problem definitions are myths, stories which draw on tradition and taken for granted knowledge. These myths, which may or may not be true in a factual sense, are important to the definition of problems because they link public issues to widely accepted ways of understanding the world and to shared moral evaluations of conditions, events, and possible solutions to problems.
Such myths perform a double-edged function in a policy or planning process. On the one hand, they can provide creative inspiration for policies, a way of translating community values into action proposals, and a powerful means to communicate to a broad public and rally support. They can mediate social and economic change by allowing new policies to carry familiar meaning. On the other hand, a myth can conceal crucial contradictions and realities, legitimize policies that benefit the powerful, and support anachronistic perceptions of policy problems.
These ideas are explored in case histories of two areas of urban policy. In one we trace the support for home ownership to a transformation of the Jeffersonian myth of the independent yeoman farmer as the ideal citizen. This use of myth made home ownership the cornerstone of US housing policies and helped suppress alternatives. Though debate over home ownership occurs in the context of housing policy, the tacit purpose is to maintain a myth which is central to our identity as a nation. In the second example, public officials and analysts engaged in an explicit myth-making process to garner support for public-private partnerships as a central tool in urban redevelopment. The myths, which drew on familiar themes, made socially beneficial cooperation seem easy to achieve and legitimized new political and institutional arrangements though it also concealed implementation difficulties.
Though myths complicate the effort to use rational, systematic analysis, they are an inevitable part of policy making and planning processes. Planning professionals must openly confront myths and make creative, responsible, use of them rather than allow policies and plans to be subject to their unexamined influence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaron, Henry J. (1978). Politics and the Professors: The Great Society in Perspective, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Adams, Salisbury M. (1983). ‘Public/Private Sector Initiatives: Principles and Action Strategies.’ National Civic Review 72: 2, February, pp. 83–98.
Banner, Knox (1976). ‘Public/Private Partnership in Downtown Revitalization.’ Journal of Housing 33: 9, October, pp. 432–434.
Baritz, Loren (1985). Backfire: American Culture and the Vietnam War. New York: Columbia University Press. (Part I: ‘The Myths We Take To War’).
Barton, Stephen (1985). Property Rights and Democracy: The Beliefs of San Francisco Neighborhood Leaders and the American Liberal Tradition. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California-Berkeley.
Bennett, W. Lance (1980). Public Opinion in American Politics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Berger, Renee (1983). ‘Building Community Partnerships: Vision, Cooperation, Leadership.’ National Civic Review 72: 5, May, pp. 249–255.
Bradford, Calvin (1983). ‘Private Sector Initiatives and Public Sector Accountability: A Case Study of Contracting With City Venture Corporation.’ Journal of the American Planning Association 49: 3.
Brooks, Harvey, Lance Liebman and Corinne S. Schelling (1984). Public-Private Partnership: New Opportunities for Meeting Social Needs. Cambridge: Ballinger.
Committee for Economic Development (1982). Public-Private Partnership: An Opportunity For Urban Communities. New York, Committee for Economic Development.
Cords, Nicholas and Patrick Gerster (1978). Myth and the American Experience, 2nd edition. Encino, Calif.: Glencoe Publishing Co.
Cunningham, James V. (1981). ‘Assessing the Urban Partnership: Do Community Forces Fit?’ National Civic Review 70: 10, November, pp. 521–526.
Dancis, Bruce (January–March 1976). ‘Socialism and Women in the United States, 1900–1917.’ Socialist Review 1: 81–144.
Dean, John P. (1945). Home Ownership: Is It Sound? New York: Harper Brothers
de Neufville, Judith Innes (1983a). ‘Symbol and Myth in Land Policy’, Chapter 12 in: William Dunn (ed.), Values, Ethics and the Practice of Policy Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Co.
de Neufville, Judith Innes (1983b). ‘Planning Theory and Practice: Bridging the Gap.’ Journal of Planning Education and Research 3: 35–45.
de Neufville, Judith Innes (1987). ‘Knowledge and Action: Making the Link.’ Journal of Planning Education and Research 6: 86–92.
Douglas, Mary (1975). Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Durning, Dan (1984). ‘Symbolic Politics and Policy Analysis: The Case of Home ownership Subsidy Policies.’ Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management. New Orleans, October 18–20.
Edelman, Murray (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Edelman, Murray (1977). Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail. New York: Academic Press.
Elder, Charles D. and Roger W. Cobb (1985). The Political Uses of Symbols. Longman, New York.
Ford, Paul Leicester (ed.) (1894). ‘Notes on the State of Virginia’, (1785) in: The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. III. New York: G. P. Putnam Sons.
Fosler, R. Scott and Renee A. Berger (eds.) (1982). Public-Private Partnership in American Cities: Seven Case Studies. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Fox, Siegrun F. (Winter 1985). ‘Who Opposes Public/Private Financial Partnerships For Urban Renewal? A Case Study’, Journal of Urban Affairs 7: 1, pp. 27–40.
Frieden, Bernard J. and Lynne B. Sagalyn (1986). ‘Downtown Shopping Malls and the New Public-Private Strategy.’ In: Marshall Kaplan and Peggy L. Cuciti (eds), The Great Society And Its Legacy. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 130–147.
Friedmann, John (1987). From Knowledge to Action: The Dialectics of Planning. Princeton University Press.
Gellen, Martin (1985). Accessory Apartments in Single Family Housing. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research.
Grebler, Leo, David M. Blank and Louis Winnick (1956). Capital Formation in Residential Real Estate, Trends and Prospects. Princeton, New Jersey: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Groth, Paul E. (1983). Forbidden History: The Evolution and Exclusion of Hotels, Boarding Houses, Rooming Houses and Lodging Houses in American Cities, 1880–1930. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ph.D. dissertation.
Hartman, Chester (1975). Housing and Social Policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Hellman, John (1986). American Myth and the Legacy of Vietnam. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hill, Stuart (1986). ‘Lumpy Preference Structures.’ Policy Sciences 19: 5–32.
Hofstadter, Richard (1956). ‘The Myth of the Happy Yeoman.’ American Heritage: April.
Hoover, Herbert (1952). The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover: The Cabinet and the Presidency, 1920–1933. New York: MacMillan.
Jackson, Kenneth (1985). Crab grass Frontier: The Suburbanization of America. New York: Oxford UP.
Journal of Community Action (1982). Special Issue on Community Partnerships, 1: 4.
Kaplan, Thomas J. (1986). ‘The Narrative Structure of Policy Making.’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 761–778.
Kautsky, John H. (1965). ‘Myth, Self-fulfilling Prophecy, and Symbolic Reassurance in the East-West Conflict.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 9: 1, pp. 1–17.
Kingston, Paul W., John L. P. Thompson and Douglas M. Eichar (1984). ‘The Politics of Home ownership.’ American Politics Quarterly A, 12: 2, April, pp. 131–150.
Ladd, Everett C. (1986). ‘Opinion Roundup’, Public Opinion, Sept./Oct, pp. 21–29.
Langton, Stuart (1983). ‘Public-Private Partnership: Hope or Hoax?’ National Civic Review 72: 5, May, pp. 256–261.
Lewis, Michael (1978). The Culture of Inequality. New York: New American Library.
Luker, Kristin (1984). Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Marcuse, Peter (1971). ‘Home ownership for the Poor: Economic Implications For The Owner/Occupant.’ Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, Working Paper 112–26.
Marris, Peter (1974). Loss and Change. New York: Pantheon Books.
McNeill, William H. (1982). ‘The Care and Repair of Public Myth.’ Foreign Affairs 61: 1, pp. 1–13.
Muth, Richard F. (1984). ‘Is More Really Better?’ Society 21: 3, pp. 35–49.
Nimmo, Dan and James E. Combs (1980). Subliminal Politics: Myths and Mythmakers in America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Perin, Constance (1977). Everything In Its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Peterson, Merrill D. (1960). The Jefferson Image in the American Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenbaum, Nelson and Milton Kotler (1984). Public/Private Partnerships: Leveraging Your CDGB. Washington, D.C., Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Schon, Donald (1979). ‘Generative Metaphors in the Setting of Social Policy Problems.’ In: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silver, Hilary (1986). ‘Public Housing Sales in Britain and the US.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. Milwaukee: October.
Silver, Hilary and Burton, Dudley (1986). ‘The Rhode Island's Greenhouse Compact.’ Journal of the American Planning Association 52: 3, pp. 277–289.
Silverman, Carol J. and Stephen E. Barton (1984). ‘Condominiums: Individualism and Community in a Mixed Property Form.’ Working Paper 434, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California-Berkeley.
Silverman, Carol J. and Stephen E. Barton (1986). ‘Private Property and Private Government: Tensions Between Individualism and Community in Condominiums.’ Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting in New York City, September 1.
Spiegel, Hans B. C. (1981). ‘The Neighborhood Partnership: Who's In It? Why?’ National Civic Review 70: 10, November, pp. 513–520.
Stanfield, Rochelle L. (1982). ‘Reagan Urban Policy - Count Us Out of Public-Private Partnerships.’ National Journal, July 3, pp. 1172–1175.
Sternleib, George and James W. Hughes (1984). ‘Structuring The Future.’ Society 21: 3, pp. 28–34.
Sussman, Carl (1976). Planning the Fourth Migration: The Neglected Vision of the Regional Planning Association of America. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Swidler, Ann (1986). ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’. American Sociological Review 51: 273–286.
Sykes, A. J. M. (1965). ‘Myth and Attitude Change.’ Human Relations 18: 323–337.
Sykes, A. J. M. (1970). ‘Myth in Communication.’ J. Communication 20: 17–31.
Tremblay, Kenneth R. and Don A. Dillman (1983). Beyond the American Housing Dream. Lanham:University Press of America.
Tudor, Henry (1972). Political Myth. London: Pall Mall Press.
US President's Interagency Coordinating Council (1979). Urban Action: A New Partnership to Conserve America's Communities, Washington, D.C.
US President's Task Force On Private Sector Initiatives (1982). Building Partnerships. Washington, D.C.
Veiller, Lawrence (1919). Housing Reform: A Handbook for Practical Use in American Cities. New York: Charities Publication Committee.
White, Morton and Lucia (1962). The Intellectual Versus the City: From Thomas Jefferson to Frank Lloyd Wright. Cambridge.
Wolman, Harold and Larry Ledebur (1980). ‘Public-Private Sector Cooperation: Concepts and Ambiguities.’ National Civic Review 69: 7, July, pp. 365–370.
Woodbury, Coleman (1930). ‘The Trend of Multi-Family Housing in Cities in the United States I.’ Journal of Land and Public Utility Economics 6: 3.
Woods, Robert A., and Albert J. Kennedy (1962). The Zone of Emergency: Observations of the Lower Middle and Upper Working Class Communities of Boston, 1905–1914. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wright, Gwendolyn (1983). Building the Dream: A Social History of Housing in America. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Neufville, J.I., Barton, S.E. Myths and the definition of policy problems. Policy Sci 20, 181–206 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156584
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156584