Skip to main content
Log in

Epizootics of Salmonella infection in poultry may be the result of modern selective breeding practices

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discussess the hypothesis that a major factor in the epizootics of Salmonella infection in poultry is a declining host genetic diversity. A computer model is described which is based on models that have been previously used to investigate host-pathogen coevolution in cereal crops. It is shown that, as host genetic diversity declines, parasite diversity also declines to a lower equilibrium level. With a highly diverse host, parasite numbers decline to zero. With a homogeneous host population, after an initial decline, there is a rapid increase in parasite numbers, due to the selection of a particularly well adapted parasite strain. This simple computer simulation is used as the basis for a discussion of the literature supporting the suggestion that a major factor in the epizootic of Salmonella in poultry is related to the low genetic diversity of commercial poultry flocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BarrettJ.A. (1980): Pathogen evolution in multilines and variety mixtures - J. Plant Diseases Protection 87: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BradleyD.J. (1982): Genetics of resistance to infection with special reference to Leishmaniasis -Trans. Royal Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76: 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BremermannH.J. (1980): Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host-pathogen interactions - J. Theoret. Biol. 87: 671–702.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BurdonJ.J. (1987): Diseases and plant population biology. Cambridge University Press - Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. CowdenJ.M., LynchD., JosephCA., 0'MahonyM., MawerS.L., RoweB. and BartlettC.L.R. (1989): Case control study of infections with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 in England - Brit. Med. J. 299: 771–773.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ForH.H. (1951): Genes for resistance to rust in Victory flax - Agronomy J. 43: 527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  7. GrothJ.V. (1976): Multilines and “super races” a simple model - Phytopathol. 66: 937–939.

    Google Scholar 

  8. GrothJ.Y. and PersonC.O. (1977): Gentic interdependence of host and parasite in epidemics -Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 287: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  9. HamiltonW.D., AxelrodR. and TaneseR. (1990): Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review) - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 3566–3573.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HunterP.R. and IzsakJ. (1990): Diversity studies of Salmonella incidents in some domestic livestock and their potential relevance as indicators of niche width- Epidemiol. Infect. 105: 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  11. JayakarS.D. (1970): A mathematical model for interaction of gene frequencies in a parasite and its host - Theoret. Population Biol. 1: 140–164.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeonardK.J. (1977): Selection pressures and plant pathogens - Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 287: 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LevinS.A. (1983): Some approaches to the modelling of co-evolutionary interactions. In: Nitecki M.H. (ed.). Co-evolution. University of Chicargo Press -Chicago pp. 21–65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MarshallD.R. and PryorA.J. (1978): Multiline varieties and disease control: I. The “dirty crop” approach with each component carrying a unique single resistance gene - Theoret. Appl. Genet. 51: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MayR.M. and AndersonR.M. (1983): Epidemiology and genetics in the co-evolution of parasites and hosts - Proc. Royal Soc. London B 219: 281–313.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ModeC.J. (1958): A mathematical model for the coevolution of obligate parasites and their hosts -Evolution 12: 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ModeC.J. (1961): A generalised model of a hostpathogen system - Biometrics 17: 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  18. PutmanR.J. and WrattenS.D. (1984): Principles of Ecology - Croom Helm - London.

    Google Scholar 

  19. RamplingA., AndersonJ.R., UpsonR., PetersE., WardL.R. and RoweB. (1989): Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 infection of broiler chickens: a hazard to public health - Lancet ii: 436–438.

    Google Scholar 

  20. St LouisM.E., MorseD.L., PotterM.E., DeMelfiT.M., GuzewichJ.J., TauxeR.V. and BlakeP.A. (1988): The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections - J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 259: 2103–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SimpsonE.H. (1949): Measurement of diversity -Nature 163: 688.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ToobyJ. (1982): Pathogens, polymorphism and the evolution of sex - J. Theoret. Biol. 97: 557–576.

    Google Scholar 

  23. WeatherallD.J., BellJ.I., CleggJ.B., FlintJ., HiggsD.R., HillA.V.S., PasvolG. and TheinS.L. (1988): Genetic factors as determinants of infectious disease transmission in human communities - Proc. Royal soc. London B 321: 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, P.R. Epizootics of Salmonella infection in poultry may be the result of modern selective breeding practices. Eur J Epidemiol 8, 851–855 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145331

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145331

Key words

Navigation