Skip to main content
Log in

Framework for formal ontology

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discussions which follow rest on a distinction, first expounded by Husserl, between formal logic and formal ontology. The former concerns itself with (formal) meaning-structures; the latter with formal structures amongst objects and their parts. The paper attempts to show how, when formal ontological considerations are brought into play, contemporary extensionalist theories of part and whole, and above all the mereology of Leśniewski, can be generalised to embrace not only relations between concrete objects and object-pieces, but also relations between what we shall call dependent parts or moments. A two-dimensional formal language is canvassed for the resultant ontological theory, a language which owes more to the tradition of Euler, Boole and Venn than to the quantifier-centred languages which have predominated amongst analytic philosophers since the time of Frege and Russell. Analytic philosophical arguments against moments, and against the entire project of a formal ontology, are considered and rejected. The paper concludes with a brief account of some applications of the theory presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Armstrong, D.M.: 1978, Universals and Scientific Realism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1930, Wahrheit und Evidenz, ed. by O. Kraus, Meiner, Leipzig, Eng. trans. The True and the Evident, Routledge, London, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L.: 1977, Symbolic Logic, Harvester, Hassocks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1974, ‘Formal Ontology and the Foundations of Mathematics’, in G. Nahknikian (ed.), Bertrand Russell's Philosophy, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1959, ‘Review [of writings by and on Boole]’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 24, 203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege, Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzen, G.: 1935, ‘Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen’, Mathematisches Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–31; Eng. trans. in The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 68–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1966, The Structure of Appearance, 2nd ed., Bobbs-Merrill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, R.: 1974, Meinong (The Arguments of the Philosophers), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1978, ‘On the Reality of Existence and Identity’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8, 613–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1979, ‘What is Logic?’, Journal of Philosophy 76, 285–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B.: 1973, Form and Content, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1891, Philosophie der Arithmetik. Psychologische und logische Studien, Vol. I (only volume published), Pfeffer, Halle, repr. in Vol. XII of Husserl's collected works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1900/01, Logische Untersuchungen, 1st ed., Niemeyer, Halle; Eng. trans. of 2nd ed., Logical Investigations, Routledge, London, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1901, ‘Gebiet eines Axiomensystems/Axiomensystem-Operationssystem’, first publ. in Vol. XII of Husserl's collected works.

  • Husserl, E.: 1929, Formale und transzendentale Logik, Niemeyer, Halle; Engl. trans., Formal and Transcendental Logic, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R.: 1964/65, Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, 2 vols., the 2nd in 2 parts, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A.: 1980, Aquinas, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W.: 1920, Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand, eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung, Vieweg, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarbiński, T.: 1966, Gnosiology. The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, Pergamon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künne, W.: 1982, ‘Criteria of Abstractness. The Ontologies of Husserlx, Fregex and Strawson Against the Background of Classical Metaphysics’, in Smith ed., (1982), 401–37.

  • Löwenheim, L.: 1940, ‘Einkleidung der Mathematik im Schröderschen Relativkalkul’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A.: 1906, Über die Erfahrungsgrundlagen unseres Wissens, Springer, Berlin; repr. in Vol. V of the Gesamtausgabe of Meinong's works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1980, Representation and Ontology in Austro-German Philosophy, Dissertation, University of Manchester.

  • Rausch, E.: 1937, ‘Über Summativität und Nichtsummativität’, Psychologische Forschung 21, 209–89; repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A.: 1911, ‘Zur Theorie des negativen Urteils’, in Pfänder (ed.), Münchener Philosophische Abhandlungen, Barth, Leipzig; as repr. in Reinach, Gesammelte Schriften, Niemeyer, Halle, 1921, pp. 56–120; Eng. trans. in Smith (ed.), (1982), 315–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A.: 1913, ‘Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechts’, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 1, 685–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. A. W.: 1904, ‘Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions’, Part I, Mind, n.s. 13, 204–19, as repr. in Russell, Essays in Analysis, Allen and Unwin, London, 1973, pp. 21–37.

  • Ryle, G.: 1960, ‘Letters and Syllables in Plato’, Philosophical Review 69, as repr. in Ryle's Collected Papers, I, Hutchinson, London, 1971, pp. 54–71.

  • Schröder, F. W. K. E.: 1966, Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik, 2nd ed., Chelsea, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.M.: 1982, ‘The Formalisation of Husserl's Theory of Wholes and Parts’, in Smith (ed.), (1982), 113–59.

  • Smiley, T. J. and Shoesmith, D. J.: 1978, Multiple Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.: 1978, ‘An Essay in Formal Ontology’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 6, 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.: 1981, ‘Logic, Form and Matter’, Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 55, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.: 1982, ‘Introduction to Adolf Reinach, On the Theory of the Negative Judgment’, in Smith (ed.), (1982), 289–313.

  • Smith, B. (ed.): 1982, Parts and Moments. Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and Mulligen, K.: 1982, ‘Pieces of a Theory’, Introduction to Smith (ed.), (1982), 15–109.

  • Stout, G. F.: 1918, ‘Do Finite Individuals Possess a Substantive or an Adjectival Mode of Being?’, Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume), 55, 127–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1959, Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C.: 1873, Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung, Hirzel, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, E.: 1976, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. C.: 1953, ‘The Elements of Being’, Review of Metaphysics 6, 3–18 and 171–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, B., Mulligan, K. Framework for formal ontology. Topoi 2, 73–85 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139703

Keywords

Navigation