Skip to main content
Log in

Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situ before 1945 and what we may learn from them

  • Regular Research Papers
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All three recommendations to maintain landraces in European countries, given in 1927: 1. maintenance by ‘traditional’ farmers, 2. maintenance by school personnel and pupils, and 3. maintenance by small agricultural institutions, were disregarded. The present outcome: maintenance by genebanks, which often grow landraces and improved cultivars of one crop next to each other, and which often are part of a large agricultural research institute, was advised against.

The above observation may be of value to those who at present advocate maintenance of landraces by ‘traditional’ farmers in developing countries.

It is recommended that landraces should be collected and maintained in genebanks as this will result in a partial loss of the material, whereas on farm maintenance (in situ conservation) would lead to a complete loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baur, E (1914) Die Bedeutung der primitiven Kulturrassen und der wilden Verwandten unserer Kulturpflanzen für die Pflanzenzüchtung. Jahrbuch Deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 29: 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T (1993) The science of plant breeding-support or alternative to traditional practices? In: de Boef, WK & Wellard, K (eds) Cultivating Knowledge. Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research, pp 72–77. London. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijerinck MW (1882) Hebben de wetenschappelijke onderzoekingen van de laatste jaren nieuwe gezichtspunten geopend ten aanzien van de verbetering onzer kultuurplanten? Verslag van het Verhandelde op het 35ste Nederlandsche Landhuishoudkundig Congres, gehouden te Wageningen van 26 tot 29 juni 1882, Wageningen 61: 162–168.

  • Broili, J (1907) Ein Beitrag zur den ‘Gedanken über die Gefahren und Nachteile des modernen Pflanzenzuchtbetriebes’. Dtsch Landwirtsch Presse 34: 732–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, SB (1995) In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Sci 35: 346–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen HJC (1945) Beschrijving en veroordeling van de in de jaren 1943 en 1944 verzamelde landrasmonsters en landrasproefvelden. Wageningen. Typescript. 94p. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.

  • Derksen HJC (1946) De betekenis van onze landrassen. Meded. NAK april: 60–61.

  • Früwirth, C (1928) Zur Frage der Erhaltung unserer Landsorten. Pflanzenbau 5: 157–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambersky, O (1903) Studien über die böhmische Landgerste. Z Landwirtsch Versuchsw 1: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiessling, L (1908) Einige Beobachtungen über Weizenvariationen. Fühlings Landwirtsch Zeitung 57: 737–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiessling, L (1912) Die züchterische Bearbeitung der Landsorten in Bayern. Beitr Pflanzenzucht 2: 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Chr O (1990) Hundert Jahre Sammlung und Nutzung von Landsorten. In: Gemeinsames Kolloquium: Sicherung und Nutzbarmachung pflanzengenetischer Ressourcen, pp 10–22. Braunschweig-Gatersleben. FAL-IPK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansholt UJ (1909) Plantenteelt II. Beknopte handleiding tot de kennis van den Nederlandschen landbouw, 3rd and revised issue. Zwolle. 228p. W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.

  • Melaku Worede & Hailu Mekbib (1993) Linking genetic resource conservation to farmers in Ethiopia. In de Boef W, Amanor K & Wellard K (eds) Cultivating knowledge. Genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research, pp 78–84. London.

  • Nijdam FJ (1947) Rassen en vormen van landbouwstambonen, die ten behoeve van eigen gebruik in Nederland worden verbouwd. Techn. Berichten v.d. Peulvruchten-Studie-Combinatie, Wageningen, nr 42. 10p.

  • Oldfield, ML & Alcorn, JB (1987) Conservation of traditional agroe-cosystems. AIBS Bull 37: 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarev 1923 De le dégénérescense des blés. Bull. Appl Bot Genet plant breed 13: 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, HC (1900) Graubundens Getreidevarietäten mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre horizontale Verbreitung. Ber Schweiz Bot Gesell 10: 45–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Shands, HL (1991) Complementary of in-situ and ex-situ germplasm conservation from the standpoint of the future user. Israel J Bot 40: 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhey, FL (1945) Het Didamsche smeelensnijdersbedrijf. Landbouwk Tijdschr 56/57: 470–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, AC (1970) Martinus Willem Beijerinck, a hybridizer of Triticum and Hordeum species at the end of the 19th century and his investigations into the origin of wheat. Euphytica 19: 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC (1990) Landraces and improved cultivars of bread wheat and other wheat types grown in the Netherlands up to 1944. Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 90.2. Wageningen. 103p.

  • Zeven, AC (1991) Four hundred years of cultivation of Dutch white clover landraces. Euphytica 54: 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeven, A.C. Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situ before 1945 and what we may learn from them. Genet Resour Crop Evol 43, 337–341 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132953

Key words

Navigation