Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity and evolution: What everybody knows

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consensus among evolutionists seems to be (and has been for at least a century) that the morphological complexity of organisms increases in evolution, although almost no empirical evidence for such a trend exists. Most studies of complexity have been theoretical, and the few empirical studies have not, with the exception of certain recent ones, been especially rigorous; reviews are presented of both the theoretical and empirical literature. The paucity of evidence raises the question of what sustains the consensus, and a number of suggestions are offered, including the possibility that certain cultural and/or perceptual biases are at work. In addition, a shift in emphasis from theoretical to empirical inquiry is recommended for the study of complexity, and guidelines for future empirical studies are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlan, H.: 1974, ‘On a Formal Definition of Organization’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 45, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J.: 1974, ‘The Concept of Biological Progress’, in F.J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, MacMillan Press Ltd., London, pp. 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J.T.: 1988, The Evolution of Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D.R. and E.O. Wiley: 1988, Evolution as Entropy, 2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castrodeza, C.: 1978, ‘Evolution, Complexity, and Fitness’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 71, 469–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisne, J.L.: 1974, ‘Evolution of the World Fauna of Aquatic Free-Living Arthropods’, Evolution 28, 337–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B.J.: 1985, ‘Size and Behavior in Ants: Constraints on Complexity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82, 8548–8551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E.D.: 1871, ‘The Method of Creation of Organic Forms’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 12, 229–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859 (1964), On the Origin of Species (A facsimile of the first edition), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1987, ‘Notebook E’, in P.H. Barett et al. (eds.), Charles Darwin's Notebooks, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denbigh, K.G.: 1975, ‘A Non-Conserved Function for Organized Systems’, in L. Kubat and J. Zeman (eds.), Entropy and Information in Science and Philosophy, American Elsevier, New York, pp. 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D.C.: 1986, ‘Progress in Organismal Design’, in D.M. Raup and D. Jablonski (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatlin, L.L.: 1972, Information Theory and the Living System, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudge, T.A.: 1961, The Ascent of Life, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.: 1977a, ‘Eternal Metaphors of Paleontology’, in A. Hallam (ed.), Patterns of Evolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.: 1977b, Ontogeny and Phytogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., N.L. Gilinsky, and R.Z. German: 1987, ‘Asymmetry of Lineages and the Direction of Evolutionary Time’, Science 236, 1437–1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.: 1988, ‘On Replacing the Idea of Progress with an Operational Notion of Directionality’, in N.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.K.: 1934, ‘Polyisomerism and Anisomerism in Cranial and Dental Evolution Among Vertebrates’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 20, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.K.: 1935a, ‘Reduplication in Evolution’, Quarterly Review of Biology 10, 272–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.K.: 1935b, ‘“Williston's Law” Relating to the Evolution of Skull Bones in the Vertebrates’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 20, 123–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.K.: 1951a, Evolution Emerging, Volume 1,The MacMillan Company, New York, pp. 548–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W.K.: 1951b, Evolution Emerging, Volume 2, The MacMillan Company, New York, p. 899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinegardner, R. and J. Engelberg: 1983, ‘Biological Complexity’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 104, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988, ‘Progress in Ideas of Progress’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.S.: 1953, Evolution in Action, Harper and Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampis, G. and V. Csányi: 1987, ‘Notes on Order and Complexity’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 124, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M.J.: 1987, ‘Is Evolution Random?’, in R.A. Raff and E.C. Raff (eds.), Development as an Evolutionary Process, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck, J.B.P.A.M.: 1809 (1984), Zoological Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, R.: 1988, ‘A Simple Measure of Complexity’, Nature 336, 306–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C.: 1968, ‘Evolution’, in D.L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Volume 5, The MacMillan Company and The Free Press, pp. 202–210.

  • Maddox, J.: 1990, ‘Complicated Measures of Complexity’, Nature 344, 705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1970, ‘Time in the Evolutionary Process’, Studium Generale 23, 266–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1988, ‘Evolutionary Progress and Levels of Selection’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maze, J. and R.K. Scagel: 1983, ‘A Different View of Plant Morphology and the Evolution of Form’, Systematic Botany 8, 469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, J.W.: 1977, ‘Complexity in Organic Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 68, 457–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J.: 1936, Order and Life, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.: 1866, Anatomy of Vertebrates, Volume 2, Longmans, Green, and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papentin, F.: 1980, ‘On Order and Complexity. I. General Considerations’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 87, 421–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papentin, F.: 1982, ‘On Order and Complexity. II. Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Structures’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 95, 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., G. Nicolis, and A. Babloyantz: 1972, ‘Thermodynamics of Evolution’, Physics Today, December, pp. 38–44.

  • Raup, D.M.: 1977, ‘Stochastic Models in Evolutionary Palaentology’, in A. Hallam (ed.), Patterns of Evolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch, B.: 1960, Evolution above the Species Level, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 281–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.C. and T.C. Kane: 1988, ‘Orthogenesis and Evolution in the Nineteenth Century’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, K.A., R.K. Scagel, and J. Maze: 1988, ‘Sources of Morphological Variation and Organization Within and Among Populations of Balsamorhiza sagittata’, Canadian Journal of Botany 66, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1988, ‘Molecules to Men: Evolutionary Biology and Thoughts of Progress’, in M.H. Nitecki (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 97–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S.N.: 1985, Evolving Hierarchical Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P.T. and M.-W. Ho: 1976, ‘On the Increase in Complexity in Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 63, 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P.T. and M.-W. Ho: 1981, ‘On the Increase in Complexity in Evolution II. The Relativity of Complexity and the Principle of Minimum Increase’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 90, 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopf, T.J.M., D.M. Raup, S.J. Gould, and D.S. Simberloff: 1975, ‘Genomic Versus Morphologic Rates of Evolution: Influence of Morphologic Complexity’, Paleobiology 1, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G.: 1949, The Meaning of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H.: 1890, First Principles, 5th edition, Williams and Norgate, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H.: 1893, The Principles of Biology, Volume 2, D. Appleton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S.M.: 1973, ‘An Explanation for Cope's Rule’, Evolution 27, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G.L.: 1969, The Basis of Progressive Evolution, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao, J., C.P. Geevan, and G. Subba Rao: 1982, ‘Significance of the Information Content of DNA in Mutations and Evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 96, 571–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetlitz, M.: 1989, ‘Facts, Values, and Progress: Julian Huxley's Use of the Fossil Record’, A talk presented before the Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology, University of Western Ontario, 25 June 1989. (Copies are available from the author at the following address: History Department, University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.)

  • Vogt, P.R. and J.C. Holden: 1979, ‘The End-Cretaceous Extinctions: A Study of the Multiple Working Hypotheses Method Gone Mad’, in W.K. Christensen and T. Birkelund (eds.), Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary Events Symposium Proceedings, Volume 2, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H.: 1969, ‘Paradigm for an Evolutionary Process’, in C.H. Waddington (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, Volume 2, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp. 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D.B., E.F. Connor, A.J. de Ricqlès, J. Dzik, D.C. Fisher, S.J. Gould, M. LaBarbera, D.A. Meeter, V. Mosbrugger, W.-E. Reif, R.M. Rieger, A. Seilacher, and G.P. Wagner: 1986, ‘Directions in the History of Life’, in D.M. Raup and D. Jablonski (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, J.S.: 1979, ‘The Generation of Complexity in Evolution: A Thermodynamic and Information-Theoretical Discussion’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 77, 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicken, J.S.: 1987, Evolution, Thermodynamics, and Information, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R.: 1990, ‘The Intelligence Test’, The New Republic, 29 January, pp. 29–36.

  • Yagil, G.: 1985, ‘On the Structural Complexity of Simple Biosystems’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 112, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McShea, D.W. Complexity and evolution: What everybody knows. Biol Philos 6, 303–324 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132234

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132234

Key words

Navigation