Skip to main content
Log in

On the determination of the closure parameters in higher-order closure models

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In higher-order closure models at least the pressure redistribution and the dissipation of the turbulent kinetic energy and the temperature variance have to be parameterized. Due to this, the introduction of proportionality coefficients — the so-called closure parameters — is forced, which have to be determined before the model is used. We compare a group of models which use the return-to-isotropy hypothesis (Rotta, 1951) to describe the pressure redistribution and assume local isotropy for the smallest eddies in order to parameterize the dissipation. Special concern is given to the method of Mellor and Yamada (1982). Some of the closure parameters are re-derived on the basis of sensitivity studies requiring that both shear production and buoyancy behave in a realistic way if pressure redistribution or dissipation is changed by varying the closure parameters. This set of parameters is compared with those obtained by fitting to experimental data, by use of the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory and by considering ratios of variances, covariances and mean flow gradients, respectively. It is shown that the various sets of closure parameters are at least of the same order. The differences give some insight into the advantages and disadvantages of the various determination procedures. However, the general accordance of the different parameter sets supports the assumption of universal constants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • André, J. C., De Moor, G., Lacarrère, P., Therry, G., and du Vachat, R.: 1978, ‘Modeling the 24-Hour Evolution of the Mean and Turbulent Structures of the Planetary Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1861–1885.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, J. C., De Moor, G., Lacarrère, P., Therry, G., and du Vachat, R.: 1979, ‘The Clipping Approximation and Inhomogeneous Turbulence Simulations’, in F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt, and J. H. Whitelaw (eds.), Turbulent Shear Flows I, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremhorst, K. and Bullock, K. J.: 1973, ‘Spectral Measurements of Turbulent Heat and Momentum Transfer in Fully Developed Pipe Flow’, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 16, 2141–2154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, T. H., Harris, K. G., and Corrsin, S.: 1970, ‘Experiments on Nearly Homogeneous Turbulent Shear Flow’, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 81–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte-Bellot, G.: 1965, ‘Ecoulement turbulent entre deux parois parallèles’, Publ. Sci. Tech. 419, Ministère de l'Air, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, J. W.: 1973, ‘The Use of Subgrid Transport, Equations in a Three-Dimensional Model of Atmospheric Turbulence’, J. Fluid Eng. 95, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, J. W.: 1976, ‘Clear and Cloud Capped Mixed Layers: Their Numerical Simulation, Structure and Growth and Parameterization’, Seminars on the Treatment of the Boundary Layer in Numerical Weather Prediction, ECMWF, Reading, 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanjalic, K., and Launder, B. E.: 1972, ‘Fully Developed Asymmetric Flow in a Plane Channel’, J. Fluid. Mech. 51/2, 301–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N.: 1942, ‘Equations of Turbulent Motion of an Incompressible Fluid’, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 6, 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebanoff, P. S.: 1955, Characteristics of Turbulence in a Boundary Layer with Zero Pressure Gradient, Rep. No. 1247, Natl. Adv. Comm. for Aeronaut., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, J.: 1950, Investigation of Turbulent Flow in a Two-Dimensional Channel, Tech. Note 2123, Natl. Adv. Comm. for Aeronaut., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, J.: 1954, The Structure of Turbulence in Fully Developed Pipe Flow, Rep. 1174, Natl. Adv. Comm. for Aeronaut., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J., and Rodi, W.: 1975, ‘Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-stress Turbulence Closure’, J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development for a Turbulence Closure Model for Geophysical Fluid Problems’, Rev. Geoph. Space Phys. 20, 851–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A. E. and Abell, C. J.: 1975, ‘Scaling Laws for Pipe-Flow Turbulence’, J. Fluid Mech. 67, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, O.: 1893, ‘On the Dynamical Theory of Incompressible Fluids and the Determination of the Criterion’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A18b, 123–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, W. G.: 1966, ‘Results of an Attempt to Generate a Homogeneous Turbulent Shear Flow’, J. Fluid Mech. 25, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotta, J. C.: 1951, ‘Statistische Theorie nichthomogener Turbulenz’, Z. Phys. 129, 547–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, R. M. C. and Mellor, G. L.: 1973, ‘Experiments in Convex Curvature Effects in Turbulent Boundary Layers’, J. Fluid Mech. 60, 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. A. G.: 1964, ‘An Experimental Study of Turbulence in a Density-Stratified Shear Flow’, J. Fluid Mech. 19, 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. E. and Deardorff, J. W.: 1974, ‘A Laboratory Model of the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1297–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard, J. C. and Coté, O. R.: 1974, ‘The Evolution of a Convective Planetary Boundary Layer, A Higher-Order-Closure Model Study’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyngaard, J. C., Coté, O. R., and Rao, K. S.: 1974, ‘Modeling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Adv. Geophys. 18A, 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaglom, N.: 1977, ‘Comments on Wind and Temperature Flux-Profile Relationships’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 11, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, N.: 1985, ‘Model for the Pressure Terms in the Equations for Second-Order Turbulence Moment, and its Application to the Atmospheric Surface Layer’, J. Met. Soc. Japan 63, 695–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. B. O., Hsu, E. Y., and Street, R. L.: 1973, ‘Air-Water Interaction: The Nature of Turbulent Heat, Mass, and Momentum Transfer Mechanism in the Air Boundary Layer’, Tech. Rep. No. 163, Dept. of Civ. Eng., Stanford Univ., California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, O.: 1975, ‘The Dynamics of Entrainment in Planetary Boundary Layers: A Study in Turbulence Modeling and Parameterization’, Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State Univ., Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, O. and Tennekes, H.: 1975, ‘A Self-Contained Model for the Pressure Terms in the Turbulent Stress Equation of a Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 1808–1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, O., and Lumley, J. L.: 1976, ‘Modeling Buoyancy Driven Mixed Layers’, J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1974–1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wichmann, M., Schaller, E. On the determination of the closure parameters in higher-order closure models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37, 323–341 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117481

Keywords

Navigation