Abstract
Daphnia pulex (Crustacea: Cladocera) embryos were found to be sensitive to a chemical cue (kairomone) in an extract of the predator Chaoborus americanus (Insecta:Diptera). Sensitivity of embryos to the kairomone remains throughout embryonic development. Apparently declining sensitivity as development proceeds may be due to the amount of time the embryos are exposed to the kairomone. Male embryos were also found to be sensitive to the kairomone. The smallest eggs within a brood produced small offspring, which showed the antipredator morphology to a significantly lower degree than largest eggs. The production of the neckteeth is described, at the developmental stage in the maturation of the Daphnia coinciding approximately with the escape of the embryos from the brood chamber.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldass, F. V., 1942. Entwicklung von Daphnia pulex. Zool. Jb. 67: 1–60.
Banta, A. M., 1939. Studies on the physiology, genetics and evolution of some Cladocera. Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Washington, D. C. Dept. of Genetics, No. 39.
Banta, A. M. & L. A. Brown, 1929. Control of sex in Cladocera: Crowding the mothers as a means of controlling male production. Physiol. Zool. 2: 80–92.
Black, A. R. & S. I. Dodson, 1990. Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 83: 117–122.
Dodson, S. I., 1974. Adaptive change in plankton morphology in response to size-selective predation: A new hypothesis of cyclomorphosis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 721–729.
Dodson, S. I., 1989. The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia 78: 361–367.
Green, J., 1954. Size and reproduction in Daphnia magna (Crustacea:Cladocera) Proc. zool. soc. Lond. 124: 535–545.
Goulden, C. E., L. Henry & D. Berrigan, 1987. Egg size, postembryonic yolk, and survival ability. Oecologia 72: 28–31.
Hairston, N. G. Jr. & B. T. De Stasio, Jr., 1988. Rate of evolution slowed by a dormant propagule pool. Nature 336: 239–242.
Hanazato, T., 1990. Induction of helmet development by a Chaoborus factor in Daphnia ambigua during juvenile stages. J. Plankton. Res. 12: 1287–1294.
Havel, J. E., 1987. Predator-induced defenses: A review. pp. 263–278 in W. C. Kerfoot & A. Sih (eds) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. New England Press, Hanover, N.H.
Havel, J. E. & S. I. Dodson, 1984. Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: Behavioral observations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 487–494.
Havel, J. E. & S. I. Dodson, 1987. Reproductive costs of Chaoborus-induced polymorphism in Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiol. 150: 273–281.
Hebert, P. D. N. & P. M. Grewe, 1985. Chaoborus induced shifts in the morphology of Daphnia ambigua. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 1291–97.
Hobaek, A. & P. Larsson, 1990. Sex determination in Daphnia magna. Ecology 71: 2255–2268.
Jacobs, J., 1980. Environmental control of cladoceran cyclomorphosis via target-specific growth factors in the animal. In Kerfoot, W. C. (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, N.H.: 429–437.
Kerfoot, W. C., 1974. Egg size cycle of a cladoceran. Ecology 55: 1259–1270.
Krueger, D. A. & S. I. Dodson, 1981. Embryological induction and predation ecology in Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 219–223.
Lampert, W. & U. Schober, 1980. The importance of ‘threshold’ food concentrations. In W. C. Kerfoot (ed.), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, N.H.
Lubbock, J., 1857. An account of the two methods of reproduction in Daphnia, and of the structure of the ephippium. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. 57: 79–100.
Lynch, M., L. J. Weider & W. Lampert, 1986. Measurement of the carbon balance in Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 17–33.
Minitab, L., 1987. Release 6.1.1. Minitab, Inc. 3081 Enterprise Dr., State College, PA. 16801.
Parejko, K. & S. I. Dodson, 1990. Progress towards characterization of a predator/prey kairomone: Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus. Hydrobiol., 198: 51–59.
Parejko, K., 1991a. Predation by chaoborids on typical and spined Daphnia pulex. Freshwat. Biol., 25: 211–217.
Parejko, K. & S. I. Dodson, 1991b. The evolutionary ecology of an antipredator reaction norm: Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus. Evolution, in press.
Riessen, H. P. & W. G. Sprules, 1990. Demographic costs of antipredator defenses in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71: 1536–1546.
Schwartz, S., 1984. Life history strategies in Daphnia: a review and predictions. Oikos 42: 114–122.
Sih, A., 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, N.H.: 203–224.
Snedecor, G. W. & W. G. Cochran, 1980. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.
Tessier, A. J. & N. L. Consolatti, 1989. Variation in offspring size in Daphnia and consequences for individual fitness. Oikos 56: 269–276.
Threlkeld, S., 1979. Estimating cladoceran birth rates: The Importance of egg mortality and the egg age distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 601–612.
Threlkeld, S., 1987.Daphnia life history strategies and resource allocation patterns. In Daphnia, Mem. Ist. ital. Idrobiol. 45: 353–366.
Walls, M. & M. Ketolla, 1989. Effects of predator-induced spines on individual fitness in Daphnia pulex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 390–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parejko, K. Embryology of Chaoborus-induced spines in Daphnia pulex . Hydrobiologia 231, 77–84 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006499
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006499