Abstract
In a recent article, McConkie et al. (1989) proposed that, due to the rapid drop-off of visual acuity, the amount of visual information available from a word is maximal when the eye fixates the middle of the word, and decreases on both sides of this optimal viewing position with each letter of deviation. However, data on perceptual span have demonstrated that during a fixation, more letters are utilized to the right than to the left of the fixation point, which would predict that the optimal viewing position should be left of center. In a letter discrimination task, the ratio of the left/right asymmetry was determined and the probability of correct word recognition as a function of fixation location in the word was estimated. The predictions were highly compatible with empirical results on word recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767–782.
Bouma, H., & Legein, C. P. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 15, 69–80.
Jacobs, R. J. (1979). Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery. Vision Research, 19, 1187–1196.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: n. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245–253.
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 365–368.
Nazir, T. A. (in press). On the role of refixations in letter strings: The influence of oculomotor factors. Perception & Psychophysics.
Olzak, L. A., & Thomas, J. P. (1986). Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 7.1–7.56). New York: Wiley.
O’Regan, J. K. (1984). How the eye scans isolated words. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–168). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.
O’Regan, J. K. (1989). Visual acuity, lexical structure, and eye movements in word recognition. InB. Elsendoorn & H. Bouma (Eds.), Working models of human perception (pp. 261–292). London: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), The psychology of reading, attention, and performance XII (pp. 363–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillére, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 250–257.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 537–544.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–550.
Tresor de la langue FranÇaise (1971). Nancy, France: Centre National de la Recherche FranÇaise.
Underwood, N. R., & McConkie, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 153–162.
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583–600.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Fondation FYSSEN to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nazir, T.A., O’Regan, J.K. & Jacobs, A.M. On words and their letters. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 29, 171–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335227
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335227