Abstract
In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. On putting apples into bottles― A problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 167–180.
Corbett, A. T., & Dosher, B. A. Instrument inferences in sentence encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 479–491.
Craik, F. I. M. Levels of processing: Overview and closing comments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Jenkins, J. J. Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 519–533.
Nelson, D. L. Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Till, R. E. Sentence memory prompted with inferential recall cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977, 3, 129–141.
Till, R. E., Cormak, D. R., & Prince, P. L. Effects of orienting tasks on sentence comprehension and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 59–66.
Tulving, E. Relation between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Till, R.E. Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 171–174 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678